Every respected Web-authoring Guru says that.
This is the era of table-less design, CSS code, XHTML compliant
websites.
Separate layout from content.
There's no reason to use tables any more.
Everything can be done with CSS.
Tables are so 2002ish ...
Do you agree with that?
I don't.
I've run into many situations where I just couldn't achieve the
desired effect in different browsers without using tables.
But it could be that I'm not well versed on the intricacies of CSS ...
136  4896 
"1001 Webs" <10******@gmail .comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ 57g2000hsv.goog legroups.com...
Every respected Web-authoring Guru says that.
This is the era of table-less design, CSS code, XHTML compliant
websites.
Separate layout from content.
There's no reason to use tables any more.
Everything can be done with CSS.
Tables are so 2002ish ...
Do you agree with that?
I don't.
I've run into many situations where I just couldn't achieve the
desired effect in different browsers without using tables.
Sometimes the only way is to use a table. Sometimes. Only sometimes and only
for a very small part of a page.
One of those times is, of course, if one is offering up tabular data, which
point you seem to have missed.
But it could be that I'm not well versed on the intricacies of CSS ...
Given the site you offered up for review over at alt.html.critiq ue I would
have to agree with this.
--
Richard.
1001 Webs wrote:
Every respected Web-authoring Guru says that.
Really?
This is the era of table-less design, CSS code, XHTML compliant
websites.
Separate layout from content.
And guess what the content is marked up with? (Hint: HTML.) So either
you or whoever's prognostication s you're reading is confused.
Is there some reason you had to post this two five newsgroups?
On Nov 3, 3:35 pm, 1001 Webs <1001w...@gmail .comwrote:
Every respected Web-authoring Guru says that.
This is the era of table-less design, CSS code, XHTML compliant
websites.
Separate layout from content.
There's no reason to use tables any more.
Everything can be done with CSS.
Tables are so 2002ish ...
Do you agree with that?
I don't.
I've run into many situations where I just couldn't achieve the
desired effect in different browsers without using tables.
But it could be that I'm not well versed on the intricacies of CSS ...
Tables are the easiest
If you need something simple use tables
mic...@gmail.co m wrote:
On Nov 3, 3:35 pm, 1001 Webs <1001w...@gmail .comwrote:
Every respected Web-authoring Guru says that.
This is the era of table-less design, CSS code, XHTML compliant
websites.
Separate layout from content.
There's no reason to use tables any more.
Everything can be done with CSS.
Tables are so 2002ish ...
Do you agree with that?
I don't.
I've run into many situations where I just couldn't achieve the
desired effect in different browsers without using tables.
But it could be that I'm not well versed on the intricacies of CSS ...
Tables are the easiest
If you need something simple use tables
That's not true. CSS is simple and more powerfull then layout tables.
As an example check out this template I made. http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz/temp/template.html
--
Regards Chad. http://freewebdesign.awardspace.biz mi****@gmail.co m wrote:
On Nov 3, 3:35 pm, 1001 Webs <1001w...@gmail .comwrote:
>Every respected Web-authoring Guru says that.
This is the era of table-less design, CSS code, XHTML compliant
websites.
Separate layout from content.
There's no reason to use tables any more.
Everything can be done with CSS.
Tables are so 2002ish ...
Do you agree with that?
I don't.
I've run into many situations where I just couldn't achieve the
desired effect in different browsers without using tables.
But it could be that I'm not well versed on the intricacies of CSS ...
Tables are the easiest
If you need something simple use tables
See if you feel that way after editing a site with a half dozen nested
tables with row and column spans...
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
1001 Webs wrote:
>
There's no reason to use tables any more.
Do you agree with that?
yawn
This is a boring subject that is only brought up by clueless, lazy
people that haven't bothered reading the newsgroup archives.
I don't.
But it could be that I'm not well versed on the intricacies of CSS ...
indeed
--
Berg
1001 Webs <10******@gmail .comwrote:
>Every respected Web-authoring Guru says that.
This is the era of table-less design, CSS code, XHTML compliant
websites.
Separate layout from content.
There's no reason to use tables any more.
Everything can be done with CSS.
Tables are so 2002ish ...
Do you agree with that?
No. On two counts:
1) Not EVERY respected web-authoring guru says that, only some.
2) It's bollocks <g>
>I don't.
Ditto!
>I've run into many situations where I just couldn't achieve the
desired effect in different browsers without using tables.
But it could be that I'm not well versed on the intricacies of CSS ...
Tables are appropriate for table layouts. They also work great for
some other layouts.
CSS is a distinct and separate system for suggesting colours, sizes,
margins, paddings, line spacing. typefaces, and lots of other things.
CSS and tables are as distinct as beer and wine. One does not negate
the other.
X
Chaddy2222 <sp************ ***********@yah oo.com.auwrote:
>
mic...@gmail.c om wrote:
>On Nov 3, 3:35 pm, 1001 Webs <1001w...@gmail .comwrote:
Every respected Web-authoring Guru says that.
This is the era of table-less design, CSS code, XHTML compliant
websites.
Separate layout from content.
There's no reason to use tables any more.
Everything can be done with CSS.
Tables are so 2002ish ...
Do you agree with that?
I don't.
I've run into many situations where I just couldn't achieve the
desired effect in different browsers without using tables.
But it could be that I'm not well versed on the intricacies of CSS ...
Tables are the easiest
If you need something simple use tables
That's not true. CSS is simple and more powerfull then layout tables.
Rubbish!
Two columns, two rows, resizeable, cross browser compataible:
<table>
<tr>
<tdCell one</td>
<tdCell two</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<tdCell three</td>
<tdCell four</td>
</tr>
</table>
That's simplicity. It's also felxible.
CSS layout is a nightmare. Unreliable, not only because it's suggested
and not required, but also because it varies between browsers and runs
into problems with resizing.
X
Secret Agent X wrote:
Chaddy2222 <sp************ ***********@yah oo.com.auwrote:
>mic...@gmail.c om wrote:
>>On Nov 3, 3:35 pm, 1001 Webs <1001w...@gmail .comwrote:
Every respected Web-authoring Guru says that.
This is the era of table-less design, CSS code, XHTML compliant
websites.
Separate layout from content.
There's no reason to use tables any more.
Everything can be done with CSS.
Tables are so 2002ish ...
Do you agree with that?
I don't.
I've run into many situations where I just couldn't achieve the
desired effect in different browsers without using tables.
But it could be that I'm not well versed on the intricacies of CSS ...
Tables are the easiest
If you need something simple use tables
That's not true. CSS is simple and more powerfull then layout tables.
Rubbish!
Two columns, two rows, resizeable, cross browser compataible:
<table>
<tr>
<tdCell one</td>
<tdCell two</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<tdCell three</td>
<tdCell four</td>
</tr>
</table>
That's simplicity. It's also felxible.
Now let's see you make it fluid.
CSS layout is a nightmare. Unreliable, not only because it's suggested
and not required, but also because it varies between browsers and runs
into problems with resizing.
X
It's not a nightmare if you understand it. And if you want something to
look *exactly* like you design it, create a PDF. I'd prefer to have
fluid designs which adjust to the size of the user's window.
--
=============== ===
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp. js*******@attgl obal.net
=============== === This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics | |
by: Phong Ho |
last post by:
Hi everyone,
I try to write a simple web crawler. It has to do the following:
1) Open an URL and retrieve a HTML file.
2) Extract news headlines from the HTML file
3) Put the headlines into a RSS file.
For example, I want to go to this site and extract the headlines:
www.unstrung.com/section.asp?section_id=86
|
by: Mel |
last post by:
Are we going backwards ? (please excuse my spelling...)
In my opinion an absolute YES !
Take a look at what we are doing ! we create TAGS, things like <H1> etc.
and although there are tools (dreamweaver and the like), they are all at the
lowest level of programming (something like assembly as oposed to C++ etc.).
These tools create "brain-dead" developers that constantly have to plough
through tons of tags to do the simplest thing.
...
|
by: Francois Keyeux |
last post by:
hello everyone:
i have a web site built using vbasic active server scripting running on
iis (it works on either iis 50 and 60, but is designed for iis 50)
i know how to create a plain text email by creating a text file, with
content following certain format, and saving that file into the correct
'..\mailroot\pickup' folder, and it is working fine
|
by: LRW |
last post by:
http://gto.ie-studios.net/index.php
When you view the above site in IE, if the 1st of the three product
images is tall enough to push the cell down a couple of pixels, IE
somehow doesn't show that happening.
But if you look at it in Firefox you can see the small gap of white
where the semi-circle image is broken.
I've tried changing the background colors to gray in cells and tables
|
by: Michael C |
last post by:
Anyone know of a good HTML Rendering control? I need a control that will
render and display HTML in a Windows form. It doesn't need to pull down
HTML pages from the Web - I'll feed it all the HTML it needs to display.
I've already spent way too much time trying to get the Microsoft WebBrowser
control to work, and I have too many other things to work on to waste any
more time on it. If you know of any third-party HTML Renderers out there,...
| | |
by: Guadala Harry |
last post by:
In an ASCX, I have a Literal control into which I inject a
at runtime.
litInjectedContent.Text = dataClass.GetHTMLSnippetFromDB(someID);
This works great as long as the contains just client-side
HTML, CSS, etc.
What I want to do is somehow insert a *server control* into the , then set the server control's properties at runtime.
|
by: Lennart Björk |
last post by:
Hi All,
I have a tiny program:
<!doctype HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>MyTitle</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
|
by: Alan Silver |
last post by:
Hello,
I have read about the problems that IE has when using a doctype of HTML
4.01 Transitional. I was advised to use Strict wherever possible.
My question is, does the same apply to XHTML 1.0 Transitional? I develop
sites using ASP.NET, which emits valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional, but not
XHTML 1.0 Strict (for example, it includes a hidden form field with the
name of _VIEWSTATE, which isn't valid in Strict, but is in
Transitional).
|
by: VK |
last post by:
Hi,
After the response on my request from W3C I'm still unclear about Tidy
vs. Validator discrepansies. That started with <IFRAME> issue, but
there is more as I know. Anyway, this very basic HTML page:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
|
by: saurabh |
last post by:
Can anybody tell me how to change the value of an html control from the
c#....
eg i hv one asp.net radio button control and one html hidden
variable...
so on page load in case the radio button is checked i want to set this
hidden variable to 1 else 0...
I am not getting what to write in Page_Load(object sender,
System.EventArgs e) function to change the value of this html
variable...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
| | |
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
| | |
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
|
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |
