473,804 Members | 3,804 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
+ Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

com_dotnet

phpinfo() has a "com_dotnet " section.

It's kind of odd.

Here it says...

COM Support: enabled
DCOM Support: disabled
.net Support: enabled

What exactly is COM support?
What exactly is DCOM support?
And what exactly is .net support? And why would it say
enabled when .NET is not installed?

DCOM means an ActiveX file gets used. COM pretty much
means the same thing. Those files tend to be based upon
an object model and have a few extra functions there to
help with various programming environments.

ordinal hint RVA name

1 0 000017A6 DllCanUnloadNow
2 1 0000177A DllGetClassObje ct
3 2 00001790 DllRegisterServ er
4 3 00001764 DllUnregisterSe rver

Other than that COM is not much different than standard
libraries.

And DCOM... that one seems like it might be a COM file put
into a publicly accessible folder, but I'll need some more
help here, if such is available, because something is not
sitting too well here.

Thanks.

--
Jim Carlock
Swimming Pool, Spa And Water Feature Builders
http://www.aquaticcreationsnc.com/
Sep 12 '07
185 10743

"The Natural Philosopher" <a@b.cwrote in message
news:11******** ********@iris.u k.clara.net...
Shelly wrote:
>Israel is a democracy. About 25% of the country is Muslim. Yes, it the
Jewish homeland. So?

What proportion of the *electorate* is Muslim, tho?
25%. They are full-fledged citizens like everyone else. Theyere is only
one difference. They have the option to not serve in the army if they so
choose. That is what makes Herb's statements such a crock of shit.

Shelly
Sep 20 '07 #171
Shelly wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" <js*******@attg lobal.netwrote in message
news:8v******** *************** *******@comcast .com...
>First of all, we aren't trying to take over the world. But you are trying
to take over the world by destroying all religion. You're not doing it in
meetings - you're trying to take away our legal rights to practice our
religions.

Once again, prove your idiotic statement here. You are claiming that by not
giving you favorable status, you are being deprived of your legal right to
practice your religion. That is out and out bullshit. You can prractice
your religion as you see fit anywhere EXCEPT at public expense and on public
property -- just like ANYONE ELSE.
No, I'm not asking for favorable status. And I said NOTHING about
PUBLIC EXPENSE. I have NEVER, ANYWHERE IN THIS THREAD said public money
should be spent on religion.
Jerry, are you old enough to remember the "Domino Theory". It was
formulated by Republicans that if one country falls to Communism, then its
neighbor would fall and so on. It is another name for the slippery slope.
Once you permit religious displays on public property, then ALL religious
displays need to be allowed. That includes Satanism, The Religion of
Nudity, etc. etc. Just because you may find it offensive is not a valid
response to disallow a specific religious display. (I can assure you that
there are many non-Christians that would find Christian displays
offensive.). If it becomes the provence of government to decide what is
offensive and what is not in religious displays, then you can go the road of
Saudi Arabia where you, Jerry, would not be able to bring a cross into the
country. Better to make it black and white. NO religious displays on
public property and NO such displays funded by government.
That's fine with me. Let all religions display, as long as it is in
good taste - i.e. no nudity. Also, it is the government's job to decide
what is offensive and what is not. They do it every day. Try walking
down the street naked. You'll be arrested. That's the government
deciding your nudity is offensive.

As for Satanism, Wicca, etc., while I might find those symbols
personally offensive, there is nothing in the symbols which goes against
the morals of the community, so they should be allowed.
>>we have no movement outside of not allowing religion to permeate *every*
sector of public domain. that is an action and far from diatribe.
If you had your way, there would be no religion. You've said so yourself.

He didn't say what you are implying here. His position, and I paraphrase
here, "is that he hopes everyone would mature enough to gain the wisdom that
God is irrelevent.". You, on the other hand, are implying that he wants
this to happen by fiat. He never even hinted at such a situation.
I never said he wanted it to happen by fiat. Don't put words in my mouth.
>>it's a logical comparison. however and again, my *claim* is that there is
no objective evidence that god exists! get that through your pea-sized
brain! the logical conclusion would be that there is no god.
The *logical* conclusion is that there would be no way to know whether a
god exists or not.

1 - The "scientific " statement is that the existence of god cannot be
proven.
2 - The "logical" next step is that since there is no basis for such a
hypothesis, then it should be rejected until such time as some evidence can
be brought forth.

That is what he is saying.
Since there is no proof one way or the other, there is no "next logical
step", because any "next step" can be neither proven nor disproven.
>You're trying to say leprechauns are gods. My statement is they are not
recognized by society as gods. Not even the Irish believe they are.

You totally misunderstand what he is saying.
No, I understand exactly what he's saying.
>>i'm not against ANY religion. i go to church every sunday and blend in
just like you, jerry. i suspect a surprising number of your flock are
just like me, skeptical people in fancy suits just hoping no one asks,
'so, how's your walk with our lord jesus christ'. by the way, i fit in
quite well and am close with my pastor...we golf every weekend. go
figure.
So you're saying you're a hypocrite. You go to church but don't believe
in the teachings of the church. Ok.

He is not a hypocrite. He SAID he is going there for the social aspect. It
is a meeting place, after all. Look up the word "hypocrite" . It means
saying one thing but doing the opposite. He SAYS he goes for the social
aspect but ignores the religious message as irrelevent. Where is the
hypocrisy? Where is he doing the opposite of what he says?

Shelly
He goes to church and tries to stay awake during the service. Does he
tell his minster and friends he is an atheist and only goes there to
socialize?
--
=============== ===
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
js*******@attgl obal.net
=============== ===
Sep 20 '07 #172

"Jerry Stuckle" <js*******@attg lobal.netwrote in message
news:FP******** *************** *******@comcast .com...
And why should I have to "prove" my God exists to you - or anyone else?
There is no fraud involved. I have stated my belief. You can choose to
believe or not. It's up to you.
It depends upon what you said. If you said, "I believe God exists", the you
are correct that you don't have to prove anything to anyone because it is a
simple statement of faith. If you said "God exists", then the onus of proof
is upon you because that is a statement that you make as fact. In that
situation the burden of proof is not upon him to show the non-existence
(which is impossible), but upon you to support your statement.
Not to you, there isn't. And no, I'm not even going to try to provide any
objective evidence to you - or anyone else. I have my beliefs, and that's
good enough for me.
Either there is objective proof or there isn't. He claims there isn't. It
is impossible to prove non-existence. All you need to do to show his
statement to be wrong is to produce a single instance of objective evidence.
Unless you can do that, (which you can't), his statement stands undisputed.
I'm glad you finally admit it. But that is a direct contradiction to your
previous statement: "sorry, religious people are in the *business* of
converting."

So a correct statement would be "sorry, religious people I'VE MET are in
the *business* of converting." A big difference.
As a point of fact, I will refute Steve's statement this time. The official
policy in Judaism is to DIScourage conversions, and it has been the policy
for at least a thousand years. See, Jerry, all it takes is one instance to
show the statement to be wrong.
>there should be no need for a situation that required an opt-out option
in the first place!

Sure. They all worship a god (or in some cases gods). It is a prayer to
their god.
And what of the atheists? They don't worship a god. Again, only one
instance is needed to disprove your statement. (...or are you saying "to
hell with the atheists"? :-) )
>
And the world is full of opt-out situations every day. Every choice you
make you can opt to go another way.
For adults, that is one thing. For children it is quite another. Peer
pressure disappears to a large degree as we mature. Not so when we are
young. You are promoting cruely to children by your "opt-out choice".
>
Let the state remain NEUTRAL in such matters. Neither promoting nor
prohibiting.
The greatest asset in our democracy is the protection of the rights of the
minority from the tyrrany of the majority. Majority governs, but it must
not rule (do you understand the distinction?) . That is what the Bill of
Rights and the rest of it is all about.
>you have equal access to practice your beliefs as anyone else. the
standard is the same. the laws are the same. if you feel the gov. should
favor you more, then you're more arrogant that i thought.

No, but YOU feel the government should favor YOU more. I just want the
right to practice my religion. You want to refuse me that right - even
though it is doing NO HARM to you.
Jerry, please stop with this load of crap. NOONE IS REFUSING YOU THE RIGHT
TO PRACTICE YOUR RELIGION. PERIOD. We are merely saying you can't do it on
MY property nor at MY expense. That means not on public property nor at
public expense. You can do it all you want on PRIVATE property and paid for
by you.

Why are you dense here? We have told you this how many times now? Yet, you
insist on repeating this bullshit. Are you blinded? pig-headed? or just
plain too damn stupid to understand? Over the years I had thought more of
your intelligence than that you can't grasp the meaning of the simple
statement that has been made to you over and over and over and over ad
infinitum.

I've had it. Unless you can show how we are REFUSING YOU THE RIGHT TO
PRACTICE YOUR RELIGION, and not come up with the stupidity you have
presented, I will bow out and let you live on in your ignorance.
>>After all - what harm does it do to you that a coach offers a prayer
before a big game? Are you afraid your children will start asking
questions about something you don't believe in?

i don't know. you tell me. what if he's leading your kid in a prayer to
satan? what would your problem be with that? what, are you afraid your
children will start asking questions about something you don't believe
in?

don't be moronic.

You're the one who wants it banned, not me. And a non-denominational
prayer, by definition, is one towards no specific god. So he can't be
praying to Satan - it would not be non-denominational.

Don't be moronic.
Once you mention "god" in a positive sense, it is no longer
"non-denominational" . That is because you have already excluded atheists.
Again, all that is needed is ONE instance to refute the statement.

How about "Let us all reflect upon what a great country we live in, wish for
the health of our family and friends, be thankful for the opportunities
presented to each one of us, and hope for a future of peace and happiness"?
Would you, Jerry, call that a prayer (no mention of God or pray or giving
thanks)? Would you, Steve? And Steve, isn't this sort of what you think
about when the rest of your church is "praying"? I know that this is what I
think of every time I hear the national anthem.

Shelly
Sep 20 '07 #173
"Jerry Stuckle" <js*******@attg lobal.netwrote in message
news:MN******** *************** *******@comcast .com...
No, I'm not asking for favorable status. And I said NOTHING about PUBLIC
EXPENSE. I have NEVER, ANYWHERE IN THIS THREAD said public money should
be spent on religion.
If you dislay on public property, then you are using government money (as
they purchased the land).
That's fine with me. Let all religions display, as long as it is in good
taste - i.e. no nudity. Also, it is the government's job to decide
What about the "Anti-Christian" religion that says awful things about Jesus?
There are so many religions, surely someone can start that one? Is that in
"bad taste"? Why?
what is offensive and what is not. They do it every day. Try walking
down the street naked. You'll be arrested. That's the government
deciding your nudity is offensive.
Only in a public place. I have every right to practice nudity if I want to
in a private place with the owner's permission. (No, I am not a nudist).
Likewise, you have every right to display you religion in a private place.
>
As for Satanism, Wicca, etc., while I might find those symbols personally
offensive, there is nothing in the symbols which goes against the morals
of the community, so they should be allowed.
What about "Anti-Christianism"?
>He didn't say what you are implying here. His position, and I paraphrase
here, "is that he hopes everyone would mature enough to gain the wisdom
that God is irrelevent.". You, on the other hand, are implying that he
wants this to happen by fiat. He never even hinted at such a situation.

I never said he wanted it to happen by fiat. Don't put words in my mouth.
Look up the word "implying" in the dictionary and then we'll speak further
to this point. When you say he is refusing you the right to practice your
religion (your word, right?), well how is he doing that? By having the law
say so, that's how. Well, please also look up the "fiat".
>>>it's a logical comparison. however and again, my *claim* is that there
is no objective evidence that god exists! get that through your
pea-sized brain! the logical conclusion would be that there is no god.

The *logical* conclusion is that there would be no way to know whether a
god exists or not.

1 - The "scientific " statement is that the existence of god cannot be
proven.
2 - The "logical" next step is that since there is no basis for such a
hypothesis, then it should be rejected until such time as some evidence
can be brought forth.

That is what he is saying.

Since there is no proof one way or the other, there is no "next logical
step", because any "next step" can be neither proven nor disproven.
Not so. Statement: Pigs can fly. Experiment: Toss a pig off a ledge and
it falls. Toss it many times and it never flies. Logic: Pigs can't fly.
Jerry: There is no proof against that one of those times in the future the
pig might fly, so there is no "next step" and the statement can neither be
proven nor disproven. What he is saying is that there is no logical basis
to accept the hypothesis of a god, so, logically he rejects it. He is NOT
saying the existence of god is disproven, only that there is no logical
basis for accepting it.
>
>>You're trying to say leprechauns are gods. My statement is they are not
recognized by society as gods. Not even the Irish believe they are.

You totally misunderstand what he is saying.

No, I understand exactly what he's saying.
No.
>He is not a hypocrite. He SAID he is going there for the social aspect.
It is a meeting place, after all. Look up the word "hypocrite" . It
means saying one thing but doing the opposite. He SAYS he goes for the
social aspect but ignores the religious message as irrelevent. Where is
the hypocrisy? Where is he doing the opposite of what he says?

Shelly

He goes to church and tries to stay awake during the service. Does he
tell his minster and friends he is an atheist and only goes there to
socialize?
If it came up, I'm sure he would. If it already has come up, I'm sure he
has. Considering how strongly he has voiced his position, do you REALLY,
think he would keep silent -- especially when he plays golf with the pastor?
I think not!

In any case, you have no right to call him a hypocrite unless he tells you
he lied to the pastor about his atheism. That he goes for a reason other
than yours is totally irrelevent.

You may pay your taxes willingly because you believe our jackass president
is the greatest thing since sliced bread. I pay them for a myriad of
reasons, not the least of which is I would go to jail if I didn't -- and I
do so in spite of the stupid war that jackass is conducting. Does that make
me a hypocrite because I pay them even though I dislike a lot of what they
are doing, while you do so for the greater glory of the Bush legacy?

Shelly

Shelly
Sep 20 '07 #174

"Jerry Stuckle" <js*******@attg lobal.netwrote in message You stated "I
hope everyone would mature enough to gain the wisdom that
God is irrelevant." So by your own words, you want there to be no
religion.
"Imagine there's not heaven.
No religion too.
.....

Imagine all the people living life in peace.....

Now you may call me a dreamer.
But I'm not the only one......"

--- John Lennon

Sep 20 '07 #175

"Jerry Stuckle" <js*******@attg lobal.netwrote in message
news:YO******** *************** *******@comcast .com...
ROFLMAO! More ad-homonyms.
adhominems

Sep 20 '07 #176
<snip>
You stated "I hope everyone would mature enough to gain the wisdom that
God is irrelevant." So by your own words, you want there to be no
religion.
<snip>

i'll stop reading here. you need to get your facts straight jerry. those are
NOT my words. someone else in this thread said that. 'so by you own words'
nothing! your first clue, jerry, would be to note the use of capitalization.
see anything different about how it write, and what you quote?
Sep 20 '07 #177
Herb wrote:
On Sep 19, 7:16 am, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attg lobal.netwrote:
>Steve wrote:
>>>I can still be a Christian if I don't go to church, don't take communion,
get married by a judge... My beliefs are what make me one.
so, i'm a christian too if i have a lack of belief in christ? wow, they said
getting to heaven was as easy as "a b c", but i had no idea!
I never said anything of the sort.
>>jerry, you have your head so far up your biblical ass, it isn't even funny
anymore.
And you need to learn how to read simple English. You can't even
understand two sentences when put together.

He seems to be the kind that misstates what you said, then attacks the
misstatement as if you had said it. Those politically-correct types
are allergic to correct reasoning. They also are very trite.
Yep, I've noticed that. But I've come to expect it - and not just in
religion. If you can't refute an argument, twist it around until you can.

--
=============== ===
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
js*******@attgl obal.net
=============== ===
Sep 21 '07 #178
Herb wrote:
On Sep 16, 10:13 pm, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attg lobal.netwrote:
>Michael Fesser wrote:
>>.oO(Jerry Stuckle)
ROFLMAO! You really are a sucker, you know that?
I don't have a problem with that.
And this is a perfect example. Yep, he has more credibility than an
anonymous post on a website by an organization known for their lies.
Especially when they were not part of the conversations involved, and
Sean was.
So a little conservative wannabe has more credibility than half of the
Web and many big organizations? Tell me why! Maybe it's just because he
has the same opinions as you? So he simply _must_ be right, because you
don't allow any other opinions?
Micha
ROFLMAO!

You really don't have any clue. I'm sorry for you.

you are arguing with a bunch of emotional idiots, Jerry.
That's true. They really don't know how to carry on an intellectual
conversation, do they? Or acknowledge that Christians, Jews, Muslims,
Wiccans and others have rights, also.

--
=============== ===
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
js*******@attgl obal.net
=============== ===
Sep 21 '07 #179

"Jerry Stuckle" <js*******@attg lobal.netwrote in message
news:cL******** *************** *******@comcast .com...
Herb wrote:
>On Sep 19, 7:16 am, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attg lobal.netwrote:
>>Steve wrote:

I can still be a Christian if I don't go to church, don't take
communion ,
get married by a judge... My beliefs are what make me one.
so, i'm a christian too if i have a lack of belief in christ? wow, they
said
getting to heaven was as easy as "a b c", but i had no idea!
I never said anything of the sort.

jerry, you have your head so far up your biblical ass, it isn't even
funny
anymore.
And you need to learn how to read simple English. You can't even
understand two sentences when put together.

He seems to be the kind that misstates what you said, then attacks the
misstatement as if you had said it. Those politically-correct types
are allergic to correct reasoning. They also are very trite.

Yep, I've noticed that. But I've come to expect it - and not just in
religion. If you can't refute an argument, twist it around until you can.
Pot - kettle - black.

Shelly
Sep 21 '07 #180

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

5
4991
by: Daniel | last post by:
Does anybody have any practical experience at running PHP scripts as a Windows service? I've followed the instructions at http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.win32service.php and have downloaded the php_win32service.dll file and placed it in my extensions directory, added the line "extension=php_win32service.dll" to my PHP.ini file, restarted IIS, and when I run phpinfo() it shows as being enabled. Yet anytime I attempt to create a service...
12
41197
by: Michael Windsor | last post by:
I've been trying to integrate some PHP pages of my own with some existing code. The details of this are for the support forums for that code (where I have been asking questions), but I wonder if someone here can enlighten me as to why the problematic code is having the effect it is. For reasons I don't know, if the PHP version is 5 or greater, register_long_arrays is false and $_SESSION exists, the following statement is executed: ...
0
1427
by: comp.lang.php | last post by:
if (!function_exists('memory_get_usage')) { /** * Determine the amount of memory you are allowed to have * * @access public * @return long * @see actual_path * @link http://us2.php.net/manual/en/function.memory-get-usage.php#64156 How to use memory_get_usage() function in this
1
146867
by: angelhouse | last post by:
Hi Anyone, I am looking for help with Configuring phpThumb and ImageMagick I am new to PHP and all this technical stuff, but i'll give it a go: I have created my own website and am hosting it from my Windows XP Laptop at home using Apache and PHP. However i am trying to load and View my images using a PHP and phpThumb script . Someone on another forum gave me a code to try and see what i got from it. <?php phpinfo();
11
26647
by: cybervigilante | last post by:
I can't seem to change the include path on my local winmachine no matter what I do. It comes up as includ_path .;C:\php5\pear in phpinfo() but there is no such file. I installed the WAMP package and PEAR is in c:\wamp\php\pear I modified php.ini in the c:\wamp\php directory to reflect the actual path, but even stopping and restarting my server shows the c: \php5\pear path. I can't change it no matter what I do I also tried the...
10
89931
by: philleep | last post by:
Hi there, I have some PHP issues. Basically i've installed WAMP so that i can have a webserver/local host. I have a local host but at the moment the php isnt doing anything. Anywhere i use php code it is ignored. even the most simplest code doesnt work. so i guess i need to set up wamp, could someone advise how i do this and the settings i need. another question. do i need interent access on the pc that i use wamp and php? i usually do my...
3
3751
by: azs0309 | last post by:
Hi all, I am beginner in PHP but managed to install apache and PHP on my windows XP machine successfully. Now I want to connect it to my DB2 database on my windows XP laptop. I have managed to get some PHP files online but whenever I try to connect to the db2 database through browser I get that ibm_db2 php module not found. I have checked my system with php -m to see install modules and i can see that ibm_db2 module is there but I dont know...
5
7970
by: Chuck Anderson | last post by:
I run Apache 2.0.55, and Php (both 4.4.1 and 5.2.5) on my home PC (Windows XP). One of the scripts that I run daily needs to access a secure URL (https://..............). When I am running Php4, it can open the file. However, when I run Php5 I (now) get this error message: "Unable to find the wrapper "https" - did you forget to enable it when you configured PHP?" This is new. Last time I messed with this, I merely got:
4
4514
by: kkshansid | last post by:
i am beginner. i want to know how to run my php forms with apache compatibility on iis server. i also want to know if php forms could be connected to asp pages as our company's website is running on asp. plz reply as other option for me is to learn asp
0
9705
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look ! Part I. Meaning of...
0
9576
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it. First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
0
10567
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed. This is as boiled down as I can make it. Here is my compilation command: g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp Here is the code in...
0
10323
jinu1996
by: jinu1996 | last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth. The Art of Business Website Design Your website is...
0
9138
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own.... Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
1
7613
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM). In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules. He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms. Adolph will...
0
5515
by: TSSRALBI | last post by:
Hello I'm a network technician in training and I need your help. I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs. The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols. I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
1
4291
by: 6302768590 | last post by:
Hai team i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
3
2983
bsmnconsultancy
by: bsmnconsultancy | last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.