com_dotnet

[Jim Carlock]

phpinfo() has a "com_dotnet " section.

It's kind of odd.

Here it says...

COM Support: enabled
DCOM Support: disabled
.net Support: enabled

What exactly is COM support?
What exactly is DCOM support?
And what exactly is .net support? And why would it say
enabled when .NET is not installed?

DCOM means an ActiveX file gets used. COM pretty much
means the same thing. Those files tend to be based upon
an object model and have a few extra functions there to
help with various programming environments.

ordinal hint RVA name

1 0 000017A6 DllCanUnloadNow
2 1 0000177A DllGetClassObje ct
3 2 00001790 DllRegisterServ er
4 3 00001764 DllUnregisterSe rver

Other than that COM is not much different than standard
libraries.

And DCOM... that one seems like it might be a COM file put
into a publicly accessible folder, but I'll need some more
help here, if such is available, because something is not
sitting too well here.

Thanks.

--
Jim Carlock
Swimming Pool, Spa And Water Feature Builders
http://www.aquaticcreationsnc.com/

[Erwin Moller]

Sanders Kaufman wrote:

Michael Fesser wrote:

>"Oh dear," says God, "I hadn't thought of that" and promply vanishes in
a puff of logic.

My absolute favorite scene from the four books of that trilogy is the
final one, the one that according to the timeline, actually happened first.

It's the scene where the folks from the "second" ship (the one that
launched first) have already crashed on Earth.

The military fellow decides to go explore the other continent, and when
he does, he finds no life. But being a good Republican-type, he
declares war on that land - for pre-emptive defense.

In case civilization ever does spring up there, after his pre-emptive
strike, they'll think twice about attacking.

My fav too! :P
Gongaflingi or something they called themself in those days.
They filled it up with 'the middleman', being haircutters, in-house
decorators, lawyers, etc.

Oh my, do I miss Douglas. :-(

Regards,
Erwin Moller

>
--

My second favorite scene, in light of our current situation, is when
they decide upon tree leafs as the standard for currency - instantly
making everyone of them fabulously wealthy, although it does also cause
the prices to skyrocket.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Jerry Stuckle wrote:

>
ROFLMAO! I couldn't begin to list the things he screwed up.

Well he didn't screw up the economy to the point where the dollar is in
free fall, and the end of the mighty dollar is in sight, along with any
semblance of honour and dignity and respect for America the SuperPower.

Frankly., if a sleazy blow job on the office carpet is the price for
retaining world status and respect I'd go with the blow job anyday.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Jerry Stuckle wrote:

So you profess a belief in no god. A disbelief is also a belief.

Only a fundamentalist can say that.

And it isn't true.

You really don't understand anything abut faith and belief, do you?

It is not a disbelief. It is simply absence of belief.

Having faith in nothing, is not the same as not having faith in anything.

YOU are saying that $GOD=NULL; is a statement in *my program*.

I am telling you that there is no $GOD variable to be found anywhere in it.

Which surprises you, because you assumed that it came with the whole
language. I am telling you it doesn't.

>

>I also profess no belief in leprechauns. Does that make me some kind
of religious person?

Leprechauns are not gods.

How do you know that?

>In fact there are thousands of things I do not believe, up to and
including that GW Bush is the reincarnation of Immelda Markos.

Like my non belief in god, the are simply not worth mentioning.

What religious people do not like at all, is that to an atheist, the
issue of whether god exists or not is simply irrelevant. Uninteresting
in the highest degree. Its useless to believe or disbelieve. It has
little objective effect either way.

I really don't care one way or the other what you think. Your religious
views are your own. Just don't infringe on my right to believe as I
choose.

I don't have any religious views, Jerry. That is the whole point.
I live a life in which religion *of my own* simply DOES NOT FEATURE.

Days and weeks go by without me even thinking abut religion. And dare I
say it, its the better for it.

>>And you have a belief in the lack of a god.

No, simply no belief in its existence. And no need to have or not have
the belief.

Same idea, different words.

Not at all.

An act of disbelief is an act.

Simply not believing in the first place is not an act. Its the absence
of an act.

>

[The Natural Philosopher]

Sanders Kaufman wrote:

The Natural Philosopher wrote:

>I also profess no belief in leprechauns. Does that make me some kind
of religious person?

I just knew that with all this religious backlash, eventually the on e
true god - the Leprechauns - would be the ones to suffer.

Now I'll *never* get my pot-o-gold!

At least leprechauns could allegedly do something in the hereandnow, as
opposed to the hereafter,from which no one has ever brought back a
travelogue...;-)

[The Natural Philosopher]

Jerry Stuckle wrote:

>>
I don't worship.

No, you don't worship a god.

No, I don't worship. Period.

I admit there was a girl once...but that is another story, and just goes
to show how wrong you can be when you do the worship bit.

Thats probably why the smart priests had the congregations worshipping
god. Keeps em out of trouble. If they are so to speak 'worship-prone'

The secret of adulthood is to not BE worship prone.

"When I became a man, I put away childish things".
:-)

[The Natural Philosopher]

Shelly wrote:

Remember, too, that Satanism is a
religion. It is devil worship.

Hmm. As one who has studied it quite extensively, it probably isn't, you
know.

But thats history for you.
And Hollywood.

[The Natural Philosopher]

Jerry Stuckle wrote:

Not at all. If there is no god, my religion is neither helping or
hurting me. However, if there is a god, you have no chance of being
right because you never entered the lottery. OTOH, I could have picked
the "correct" religion.

"If there is no parachute..my belief in one is neither helping me
or...ARRRGGHH!! SHIT!"

Told you not to trust anything without testing it first, Jerry.

[Jerry Stuckle]

The Natural Philosopher wrote:

Jerry Stuckle wrote:

>So you profess a belief in no god. A disbelief is also a belief.

Only a fundamentalist can say that.

Or someone who reads the dictionary.

And it isn't true.

You really don't understand anything abut faith and belief, do you?

It is not a disbelief. It is simply absence of belief.

Having faith in nothing, is not the same as not having faith in anything.

YOU are saying that $GOD=NULL; is a statement in *my program*.

I am telling you that there is no $GOD variable to be found anywhere in it.

Incorrect. $GOD comes with the language - society insures that. You
just don't believe in using it.

Which surprises you, because you assumed that it came with the whole
language. I am telling you it doesn't.

And that's where you are wrong. You don't have to use it or believe in
it, but the concept is there.

>>

>>I also profess no belief in leprechauns. Does that make me some kind
of religious person?

Leprechauns are not gods.

How do you know that?

Society's definition of gods and leprechauns.

>>In fact there are thousands of things I do not believe, up to and
including that GW Bush is the reincarnation of Immelda Markos.

Like my non belief in god, the are simply not worth mentioning.

What religious people do not like at all, is that to an atheist, the
issue of whether god exists or not is simply irrelevant.
Uninteresti ng in the highest degree. Its useless to believe or
disbelieve. It has little objective effect either way.

I really don't care one way or the other what you think. Your
religious views are your own. Just don't infringe on my right to
believe as I choose.

I don't have any religious views, Jerry. That is the whole point.
I live a life in which religion *of my own* simply DOES NOT FEATURE.

Days and weeks go by without me even thinking abut religion. And dare I
say it, its the better for it.

But you do have religious views. Whether you think about them or not,
they are there. And you've been espousing them quite a bit in this thread.

>

>>>And you have a belief in the lack of a god.
No, simply no belief in its existence. And no need to have or not
have the belief.

Same idea, different words.

Not at all.

An act of disbelief is an act.

Simply not believing in the first place is not an act. Its the absence
of an act.

And not believing in something is disbelief. Check the dictionary.

Like it or not, you have weighed the evidence and made a conscious
decision to not believe in a god. That is an act.
--
=============== ===
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
js*******@attgl obal.net
=============== ===

[Jerry Stuckle]

Steve wrote:

"Jerry Stuckle" <js*******@attg lobal.netwrote in message
news:y8******** *************** *******@comcast .com...

>Shelly wrote:

>>"Jerry Stuckle" <js*******@attg lobal.netwrote in message
news:EM****** *************** *********@comca st.com...

Not necessary. You profess a belief in no god. That in itself is a
belief.
A "belief" does not a religion make. A belief, couple with religious
dogma and practices makes a religion.

Ceremonies and rites do not make a religion. A belief (or lack thereof)
in a higher power is what determines religion.

I can still be a Christian if I don't go to church, don't take communion,
get married by a judge... My beliefs are what make me one.

so, i'm a christian too if i have a lack of belief in christ? wow, they said
getting to heaven was as easy as "a b c", but i had no idea!

I never said anything of the sort.

jerry, you have your head so far up your biblical ass, it isn't even funny
anymore.

And you need to learn how to read simple English. You can't even
understand two sentences when put together.

--
=============== ===
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
js*******@attgl obal.net
=============== ===

[Steve]

"Jerry Stuckle" <js*******@attg lobal.netwrote in message
news:Cc******** *************** *******@comcast .com...

Steve wrote:

>"Jerry Stuckle" <js*******@attg lobal.netwrote in message
news:y8******* *************** ********@comcas t.com...

>>Shelly wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" <js*******@attg lobal.netwrote in message
news:EM***** *************** **********@comc ast.com...

Not necessary. You profess a belief in no god. That in itself is a
belief.
A "belief" does not a religion make. A belief, couple with religious
dogma and practices makes a religion.

Ceremonies and rites do not make a religion. A belief (or lack thereof)
in a higher power is what determines religion.

I can still be a Christian if I don't go to church, don't take
communion, get married by a judge... My beliefs are what make me one.

so, i'm a christian too if i have a lack of belief in christ? wow, they
said getting to heaven was as easy as "a b c", but i had no idea!

I never said anything of the sort.

well, if my lack of belief in god makes me religious, it only follows that
my lack of belief in christ should make me a christian, right?

;^)

>jerry, you have your head so far up your biblical ass, it isn't even
funny anymore.

And you need to learn how to read simple English. You can't even
understand two sentences when put together.

again, lol. you are quickly denegrading yourself to a proximity approaching
a godwin!