phpinfo() has a "com_dotnet " section.
It's kind of odd.
Here it says...
COM Support: enabled
DCOM Support: disabled
.net Support: enabled
What exactly is COM support?
What exactly is DCOM support?
And what exactly is .net support? And why would it say
enabled when .NET is not installed?
DCOM means an ActiveX file gets used. COM pretty much
means the same thing. Those files tend to be based upon
an object model and have a few extra functions there to
help with various programming environments.
ordinal hint RVA name
1 0 000017A6 DllCanUnloadNow
2 1 0000177A DllGetClassObje ct
3 2 00001790 DllRegisterServ er
4 3 00001764 DllUnregisterSe rver
Other than that COM is not much different than standard
libraries.
And DCOM... that one seems like it might be a COM file put
into a publicly accessible folder, but I'll need some more
help here, if such is available, because something is not
sitting too well here.
Thanks.
--
Jim Carlock
Swimming Pool, Spa And Water Feature Builders http://www.aquaticcreationsnc.com/
Sep 12 '07
185  10745 
Shelly wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" <js*******@attg lobal.netwrote in message
news:jt******** *************** *******@comcast .com...
>Shelly wrote:
>>"Steve" <no****@example .comwrote in message
news:gf****** *******@newsfe0 2.lga...
And BTW - atheism is a religion, also. This is conveniently
"overlooked " by those espousing it in the name of "freedom". But many
atheists are trying to force their religion on the rest of the country.
if you're not an atheist, don't presume to know what it is outside of a
proper dictionary definition.
atheism is the lack of belief in god or gods.
Sorry, Steve, but you have to give the devil his due here. From
www.m-w.com
Main Entry: athe·ism
Pronunciation : 'A-thE-"i-z&m
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle French athéisme, from athée atheist, from Greek atheos
godless, from a- + theos god
1 archaic : UNGODLINESS, WICKEDNESS
2 a : a disbelief in the existence of deity b : the doctrine that there
is no deity
To me those are declarative statements and not passive ones. It is a
"disbelief" rather than a "lack of belief". Also, when you mix
"doctrine" with theology you have "religion".
The point though that Jerry is trying to make is totally wrong, however.
Having an atheist in there, and not allowing mixing of standard religion
with politics is NOT forcing the "religion" of atheism on anyone.
Everyone is free to believe and practice as they wish -- just not mix it
into politics. My earlier statement of the flourishing of religion in
the USA **BECAUSE** of the separation and freedom goes to that point.
I'm not saying there has to be a mix of religion and politics. But I am
saying the President is also a citizen, and welcome to practice his
beliefs.
...and noone is agruing against that point.
>Personally, I would rather have a President with certain moral values
which are taught by religion. He could be Christian (my belief),
...and they are taught by society as well.
I never said they weren't.
>Jewish, Muslim or any of a number of different religions which share those
same core values. I'm not saying I would not vote for an atheist, but it
is one of the things I take into consideration when looking at candidates.
Well, do what you want (obviously) and you if you take such irrelevencies as
being religious into account you may well get stuck again with crap like we
have now in office.
Oh, you mean the first president we've had since 1992 who has any balls?
>Not to say all people who are religious follow those values - take
You got that one right! The list in interminable of such hypocrites.
>Clinton for example - getting caught with his pants down (literally).
He disgraced the office with his sexual behavior. Otherwise, he was an
excellent president. We had prosperity and low inflation. We were at
peace. He put in that wonderful excemption for the profits (largely due to
infaltion) on the sale of your primary home. He failed on health care. All
in all, he was pretty good. I voted for him once and against him once. I'd
take him again in a heartbeat over the power maniac in office now who has
sent over 3,000 young Americans to their deaths in a war that can't be won
and for an ever-shifting raison d'etre.
ROFLMAO! I couldn't begin to list the things he screwed up.
>That is something that I, as a Christian, have never done and will never
do, and I find that behavior abhorrent. My values are higher than that.
You are still a virgin? (Sorry, couldn't resist that one. I understand
what you meant to say).
Shelly
--
=============== ===
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp. js*******@attgl obal.net
=============== ===
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>
And BTW - atheism is a religion, also.
Only to religious people.
And Websters...
To atheists it is merely sidelining religion as irrelevant and getting
on with the job.
This is conveniently
>"overlooked " by those espousing it in the name of "freedom".
This is conveniently overlooked by those who cannot concieve of a person
who believes in nothing other than his sensory apparatus and what it
tells him.
Not at all. I can conceive of those people. But, unlike them, I don't
try to force them to practice my religion - but they want to prohibit me
from practicing it.
>But many atheists are trying to force their religion on the rest of
the country.
They can't. Atheism by definition is the absence of religion.
Wrong, again.
>The first amendment had to do with TOLERANCE. You worship your way
and I worship mine. You don't try to tell me what I can and cannot
do, and I don't try to tell you the same.
I don't worship.
No, you don't worship a god.
--
=============== ===
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp. js*******@attgl obal.net
=============== ===
"Jerry Stuckle" <js*******@attg lobal.netwrote in message
news:WP******** *************** *******@comcast .com...
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>
And BTW - atheism is a religion, also.
Only to religious people.
And Websters...
i have an old copy of websters that is nothing like their current
definition. plus, every dictionary has a different definition of atheism. it
just means no one really understands what it is...except atheists. we don't
mind. we're only about 2% of the world's population. even so, that doesn't
make your snappy come-back, very snappy.
;^)
>To atheists it is merely sidelining religion as irrelevant and getting on
with the job.
This is conveniently
>>"overlooked " by those espousing it in the name of "freedom".
This is conveniently overlooked by those who cannot concieve of a person
who believes in nothing other than his sensory apparatus and what it
tells him.
Not at all. I can conceive of those people. But, unlike them, I don't
try to force them to practice my religion - but they want to prohibit me
from practicing it.
wow. now would be the time for you to say what happened to you
*specifically* so we don't just discard such a statement as a generalized
blurt that is unfounded and meaningless.
you still haven't said how you reconsile your apparent aversion to
fulfilling the great commission. you may not actively tie us down, but
you're certainly supposed to tell us "the good news". btw, there is more
religious proliferation in public forums than atheists standing outside your
church's doors blocking your entrance on sunday morning. just who is forcing
whom?
>>But many atheists are trying to force their religion on the rest of the
country.
They can't. Atheism by definition is the absence of religion.
Wrong, again.
again...
a latin: without
theism latin: belief in god
i know you don't care about word origins, lexicons, or etymology in general
(your s.a.t scores must have s.u.c.k.e.d), however when there is a dispute
as the the modern interpretation of a word, the latin or greek roots are the
foundation of any definition. the one above is the simple raw data. you can
certainly appreciate at least that, being a programmer.
>>The first amendment had to do with TOLERANCE. You worship your way and
I worship mine. You don't try to tell me what I can and cannot do, and
I don't try to tell you the same.
I don't worship.
No, you don't worship a god.
no, you don't know him well enough to say that. you must take him at his
word that he doesn't worship...anyth ing. you keep acting like you are on
familiar terms with everyone. that's rather arrogant.
"Jerry Stuckle" <js*******@attg lobal.netwrote in message
news:y8******** *************** *******@comcast .com...
Shelly wrote:
>"Jerry Stuckle" <js*******@attg lobal.netwrote in message
news:EM******* *************** ********@comcas t.com...
>>Not necessary. You profess a belief in no god. That in itself is a
belief.
A "belief" does not a religion make. A belief, couple with religious
dogma and practices makes a religion.
Ceremonies and rites do not make a religion. A belief (or lack thereof)
in a higher power is what determines religion.
Sorry, no. That is just a theological stand, not a religion. It is that
stand COUPLED WITH the dogma and practices that make up a religion.
Shelly
"Steve" <no****@example .comwrote in message
news:su******** *****@newsfe05. lga...
i guess i should at least give you credit, given this thread's length, for
not pulling a godwin at this point. if you're not done with this thread
yet, i may have just predicted your next post...unless you're googling now
to avert another blunder. ;^)
Please no. Let's keep H the hell out of here.
Shelly
"Shelly" <sh*******@as ap-consult.comwrot e in message
news:13******** *****@corp.supe rnews.com...
>
"Jerry Stuckle" <js*******@attg lobal.netwrote in message
news:y8******** *************** *******@comcast .com...
>Shelly wrote:
>>"Jerry Stuckle" <js*******@attg lobal.netwrote in message
news:EM****** *************** *********@comca st.com...
Not necessary. You profess a belief in no god. That in itself is a
belief.
A "belief" does not a religion make. A belief, couple with religious
dogma and practices makes a religion.
Ceremonies and rites do not make a religion. A belief (or lack thereof)
in a higher power is what determines religion.
Sorry, no. That is just a theological stand, not a religion. It is that
stand COUPLED WITH the dogma and practices that make up a religion.
Shelly
Your karma just ran over my dogma :)
"Jerry Stuckle" <js*******@attg lobal.netwrote in message
news:WP******** *************** *******@comcast .com...
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Not at all. I can conceive of those people. But, unlike them, I don't
try to force them to practice my religion - but they want to prohibit me
from practicing it.
You keep repeating this ridiculous canard. Once and for all explain to me
how stopping the government from spending MY tax money to support the
practice of YOUR religion is STOPPING you from practicing your religion.
You can practice your religion on any PRIVATE property that allows you to do
so and you can make any statement you wish in a public place concerning
religion -- just not at PUBLICLY paid for events. Those are paid for by
people like ME who do not practice YOUR religion.
Here is one for you to ponder. Suppose I held YOUR position and want the
state to sponsor MY religion with YOUR tax dollars on PUBLIC property and,
suppose further, that MY religion was Satanism (it isn't, but lets say yes
just for the sake of argument). How would you feel about that one? What
right have you to stop me from teaching Satanism in schools? (Remember, I
am using YOUR arguments against you). Rememer, too, that Satanism is a
religion. It is devil worship.
So, Jerry, answer that one!
Shelly
"Shelly" <sh*******@as ap-consult.comwrot e in message
news:13******** *****@corp.supe rnews.com...
>
"Jerry Stuckle" <js*******@attg lobal.netwrote in message
news:WP******** *************** *******@comcast .com...
>The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Not at all. I can conceive of those people. But, unlike them, I don't
try to force them to practice my religion - but they want to prohibit me
from practicing it.
You keep repeating this ridiculous canard. Once and for all explain to me
how stopping the government from spending MY tax money to support the
practice of YOUR religion is STOPPING you from practicing your religion.
You can practice your religion on any PRIVATE property that allows you to
do so and you can make any statement you wish in a public place concerning
religion -- just not at PUBLICLY paid for events. Those are paid for by
people like ME who do not practice YOUR religion.
Here is one for you to ponder. Suppose I held YOUR position and want the
state to sponsor MY religion with YOUR tax dollars on PUBLIC property and,
suppose further, that MY religion was Satanism (it isn't, but lets say yes
just for the sake of argument). How would you feel about that one? What
right have you to stop me from teaching Satanism in schools? (Remember, I
am using YOUR arguments against you). Rememer, too, that Satanism is a
religion. It is devil worship.
So, Jerry, answer that one!
i predict..."well that just ain't amuruhkun! that satan fella is bad news.
he goes 'round possessun people and such whatnot!"
Main Entry: athe·ism
Pronunciation: 'A-thE-"i-z&m
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle French athéisme, from athée atheist, from Greek atheos
godless, from a- + theos god
1 archaic : UNGODLINESS, WICKEDNESS
2 a : a disbelief in the existence of deity b : the doctrine that there is
no deity
hey shelly, i just caught that first definition. i particularly like the
part where i'm associated with wickedness. ;^)
chat with you later.
"Jerry Stuckle" <js*******@attg lobal.netwrote in message
news:ms******** *************** *******@comcast .com...
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>>>But it seems that the same people who are stupid and irresponsible
enough to vote themselves a tax break when there's an outstanding and
past-due, mutli-generational debt to pay...
Yea, and you know what? After that tax break, the economy improved, and
federal tax revenue INCREASED. You need to go back to Economics 101.
I CLEP'd Eco101 and 102.
Then you need to go back to school.
>Where your logic fails is in your use of just ONE side of the economic
equation.
And which side is that, Sanders? It must be the same side every
recognized economics expert in the world is on, though, so I guess I'm in
good company.
uhhhh...hummmm (trying not to laugh).
well, our friend alan and most other economists like levitt and company,
clearly see two sides to manipulating and predicting ecomonomic states.
being that you're such an expert (really holding it in now) on the matter, i
find it a bit odd that you don't know that sanders is talking about the
supply side rather than the demand side...duely recognizing that either is
typically and respectively the sole target of republicans and democrats.
me thinks the 'side' your standing on now is the one where the crickets can
clearly be heard chirping.
(now letting loose the supressed hilarity) This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics | |
by: Daniel |
last post by:
Does anybody have any practical experience at running PHP scripts as a
Windows service?
I've followed the instructions at
http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.win32service.php and have downloaded
the php_win32service.dll file and placed it in my extensions directory,
added the line "extension=php_win32service.dll" to my PHP.ini file,
restarted IIS, and when I run phpinfo() it shows as being enabled. Yet
anytime I attempt to create a service...
|
by: Michael Windsor |
last post by:
I've been trying to integrate some PHP pages of my own with some
existing code. The details of this are for the support forums for that
code (where I have been asking questions), but I wonder if someone here
can enlighten me as to why the problematic code is having the effect it is.
For reasons I don't know, if the PHP version is 5 or greater,
register_long_arrays is false and $_SESSION exists, the following
statement is executed:
...
|
by: comp.lang.php |
last post by:
if (!function_exists('memory_get_usage')) {
/**
* Determine the amount of memory you are allowed to have
*
* @access public
* @return long
* @see actual_path
* @link http://us2.php.net/manual/en/function.memory-get-usage.php#64156
How to use memory_get_usage() function in this
|
by: angelhouse |
last post by:
Hi Anyone, I am looking for help with Configuring phpThumb and ImageMagick
I am new to PHP and all this technical stuff, but i'll give it a go:
I have created my own website and am hosting it from my Windows XP Laptop at home using Apache and PHP.
However i am trying to load and View my images using a PHP and phpThumb script . Someone on another forum gave me a code to try and see what i got from it.
<?php
phpinfo();
|
by: cybervigilante |
last post by:
I can't seem to change the include path on my local winmachine no
matter what I do. It comes up as
includ_path .;C:\php5\pear in phpinfo() but there is no such file. I
installed the WAMP package and PEAR is in c:\wamp\php\pear
I modified php.ini in the c:\wamp\php directory to reflect the actual
path, but even stopping and restarting my server shows the c:
\php5\pear path. I can't change it no matter what I do I also tried
the...
| | |
by: philleep |
last post by:
Hi there,
I have some PHP issues. Basically i've installed WAMP so that i can have a webserver/local host. I have a local host but at the moment the php isnt doing anything. Anywhere i use php code it is ignored. even the most simplest code doesnt work. so i guess i need to set up wamp, could someone advise how i do this and the settings i need.
another question. do i need interent access on the pc that i use wamp and php? i usually do my...
|
by: azs0309 |
last post by:
Hi all,
I am beginner in PHP but managed to install apache and PHP on my windows XP machine successfully. Now I want to connect it to my DB2 database on my windows XP laptop. I have managed to get some PHP files online but whenever I try to connect to the db2 database through browser I get that ibm_db2 php module not found. I have checked my system with php -m to see install modules and i can see that ibm_db2 module is there but I dont know...
|
by: Chuck Anderson |
last post by:
I run Apache 2.0.55, and Php (both 4.4.1 and 5.2.5) on my home PC
(Windows XP). One of the scripts that I run daily needs to access a
secure URL (https://..............). When I am running Php4, it can
open the file.
However, when I run Php5 I (now) get this error message:
"Unable to find the wrapper "https" - did you forget to enable it when
you configured PHP?"
This is new. Last time I messed with this, I merely got:
|
by: kkshansid |
last post by:
i am beginner.
i want to know how to run my php forms with apache compatibility on iis server.
i also want to know if php forms could be connected to asp pages as our company's website is running on asp.
plz reply as other option for me is to learn asp
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
| | |
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
|
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| | |
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |
