"Kidogg" <ki**********@g mail.comwrites:
...
I've managed to download the XSD for XHTML transitional from
the W3C and can validate plain XHTML files fine, and can do the
same with simple XML containing my tags - but I have no idea
how to proceed and get the .NET parser to validate from either
of the XSD's?
Or can I somehow inherit my XSD from the XHTML transitional
one? I've looked at the xsd:redefine tag but have no idea where
to start?
Unless you're doing something rather unusual you probably won't
need to use xsd:redefine. All you need to do is induce the
validator to create a single schema containing (a) the components
you want from the schema for XHTML transitional, and (b) the
components from your schema for your stuff. Many validators will
take run-time parameters indicating a set of schema documents
they should read and build schema components from; many (most?)
will automatically read and process any schema document mentioned
in a schemaLocation hint in the XML instance, unless you
explicitly tell them not to do so.
It probably won't be essential, but it may be convenient to
create a driver file: a single schema document that imports both
the XHTML schema documents you want and your own stuff. It might
look like this:
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd ="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" >
<xsd:annotation >
<xsd:documentat ion>
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Simple driver file for schema with XHTML and my-stuff.</p>
<p>Just import what we know we need. This provides a single
schema document to start out from.</p>
</div>
</xsd:documentati on>
</xsd:annotation>
<xsd:import
namespace="http ://www.example.com/myschema"
schemaLocation= "http://www.example.com/myschema.xsd"/>
<xsd:import
namespace="http ://www.w3.org/199/xhtml"
schemaLocation= "http://www.example.com/mycache/xhtml-transitional.xs d"/>
</xsd:schema>
Strictly speaking, the schemaLocation attribute on xsd:import
is a hint, not an instruction; you'll want to consult the
documentation for the validator you're using to see whether
it honors the hint (almost all current schema processors
seems to -- it can be a problem to tell them NOT to do so,
if for some reason you want to prevent it).
Once you succeed in getting the processor to build a schema
with components for both namespaces you're interested in,
you may discover that one or the other of the schema authors
has failed to indicate any place where elements in other
namespaces are legal. It's been a while since I read the
XHTML schema documents, so I don't remember whether they
have wildcards for other namespaces at appropriate locations
or not. If they do, and your stuff does, too, then you're
done. (From your description, I infer that your declaration
for a template will allow as content any element from the
XHTML namespace; if it doesn't, either I've misunderstood
your design or you may want to make a change.)
If the XHTML schema documents have no wildcards, then you'll need
to do something about it, to make sure your stuff (e.g. your
membershipcardh eader and membershipcardf ooter elements) can occur
at appropriate locations in an HTML context. The easiest way is
to declare your elements as substitutable for appropriate XHTML
elements.
If, for example, membershipcardh eader should be able to
appear pretty much wherever the XHTML 'p' element can
appear, then you'd write
<xsd:element name="membershi pcardheader"
substitutionGro up="xhtml:p"
... >
...
</xsd:element>
One concern here is that the type of membershipcardh eader
needs to be the same as that of xhtml:p, or derived from
it by extension or restriction. Be sure you're using the
schema documents from the Modularization of XHTML document,
not the ones intended for stand-alone use in "XHTML 1.0
in XML Schema".
I hope this helps.
--C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
World Wide Web Consortium
