Is it possible that in some future version of Windows, only .NET (CLR) PE
(Portable Executables) .exe will be enabled to run. I.e. the OS will not
support running of native x86 code .exes/dlls?
I understand native is needed for drivers etc. but at some point the driver
spec may even require MSIL and MSIL will add instructions to support drivers.
--
Greg McPherran www.McPherran.com
Jan 20 '06
14  1383 
"frerring " what the hell is that? I meant to type "referring "......
(Note to self: Spell-check should remain on.)
Jim
"Jim" <re***@groups.p lease> wrote in message
news:s%******** ********@bignew s4.bellsouth.ne t...
"Lloyd Dupont" <net.galador@ld > wrote in message
news:e9******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P12.phx.gbl... I don't think so.
All the industry, including microsoft, is very keen on backward
compatibility.
I don't think so. Look at VB. All VB source code for native development
from
the past can now only be built for .NET with recent versions of Visual
Studio.
I don't understand what you're saying at all.
Are you telling me that: "Microsoft is not keen on backward technology
because latest technology need latest compiler to be compiled"?
What the poster is frerring to is the fact that most Visual Basic 6
applications must be completely re-written to be used in the VB.Net
compiler. Microsoft intentionaly broke backwards compatability with
Visual Basic 6 source code when they designed VB.Net.
They abandoned millions of VB programmers and billions of lines of code
with a single stab in the back.
There is no logical relation between the first part of the sentence and
the second I could see!!!
I hope this had made it clearer for you.
Jim
Greg wrote: Is it possible that in some future version of Windows, only .NET (CLR) PE
(Portable Executables) .exe will be enabled to run. I.e. the OS will not
support running of native x86 code .exes/dlls?
I understand native is needed for drivers etc. but at some point the driver
spec may even require MSIL and MSIL will add instructions to support drivers.
If you haven't seen it, check out MS research project Singularity - http://research.microsoft.com/os/singularity/ .
Take it like that:
"Microsoft just release his new DotNetOnly Powered Windows Next Generation,
this new OS support great support for .NET apps (a specification which means
nothing to the end user) and break security barrier by Not Running Anymore
all previously build execuitable"
Now: who want to build such an OS where all his/her previous investment in
software is broken?
"Greg" <gm@mcpherran.c om> wrote in message
news:D1******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com... You are missing my point. Windows could cease to provide access to the
CPU.
Try accessing the CPU on a video game system for example.
Windows may simply take away all utilities and .exe formats that access
the
CPU directly. Yes, you could always boot into another OS, but Windows
itself
could be set up to not allow access to the CPU.
--
Greg McPherran
www.McPherran.com
"Patrice" wrote:
No, it would likely make no sense as "native" code is the only thing the
processor understands. Historically programming is adding layers between
the
processor and the developer but ultimately your code still have to reach
the
processor under a suitable form ; you can generally "enter" at any level
you
want ("debug.exe" is always part of XP)...
--
Patrice
"Greg" <gm@mcpherran.c om> a écrit dans le message de
news:58******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com... > Is it possible that in some future version of Windows, only .NET (CLR)
> PE
> (Portable Executables) .exe will be enabled to run. I.e. the OS will
> not
> support running of native x86 code .exes/dlls?
>
> I understand native is needed for drivers etc. but at some point the
driver > spec may even require MSIL and MSIL will add instructions to support
drivers. >
> --
> Greg McPherran
> www.McPherran.com
Allright..
I see...
That does not mean: "breaking bakcward compatibility" at all.
In fact you could keep using VB6 for the year to come and produce VB.exe the
way you're used to.
That means they just have stop supporting/bothering about classic VB.
There will be no new development in classic VB and, i f they had added VB
support in VS2003/2005 that would have been the exact same IDE (because they
won't bother), so why not just stick to VS6?
"Jim" <re***@groups.p lease> wrote in message
news:s%******** ********@bignew s4.bellsouth.ne t...
"Lloyd Dupont" <net.galador@ld > wrote in message
news:e9******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P12.phx.gbl... I don't think so.
All the industry, including microsoft, is very keen on backward
compatibility.
I don't think so. Look at VB. All VB source code for native development
from
the past can now only be built for .NET with recent versions of Visual
Studio.
I don't understand what you're saying at all.
Are you telling me that: "Microsoft is not keen on backward technology
because latest technology need latest compiler to be compiled"?
What the poster is frerring to is the fact that most Visual Basic 6
applications must be completely re-written to be used in the VB.Net
compiler. Microsoft intentionaly broke backwards compatability with
Visual Basic 6 source code when they designed VB.Net.
They abandoned millions of VB programmers and billions of lines of code
with a single stab in the back.
There is no logical relation between the first part of the sentence and
the second I could see!!!
I hope this had made it clearer for you.
Jim
I believe I understood what you meant. What I meant more precisely is that
IMO it would make non sense to spend time and efforts to "lock up" something
that is native to a processor on a computer.
IMO the problem is not the same for video game systems. They essentially
sold you a low cost powerfull PC to get your money on a long run by solding
games. If those PCs were "unlocked", you could bought them a PC without
buying games (i.e. they would sold you a PC at a low price and they couldn't
get money later as you wouldn't have to buy games for this machine).
So IMO you can be quite confident that you won't see this during your
lifetime.
--
Patrice
"Greg" <gm@mcpherran.c om> a écrit dans le message de
news:D1******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com... You are missing my point. Windows could cease to provide access to the
CPU. Try accessing the CPU on a video game system for example.
Windows may simply take away all utilities and .exe formats that access
the CPU directly. Yes, you could always boot into another OS, but Windows
itself could be set up to not allow access to the CPU.
--
Greg McPherran
www.McPherran.com
"Patrice" wrote:
No, it would likely make no sense as "native" code is the only thing the
processor understands. Historically programming is adding layers between
the processor and the developer but ultimately your code still have to reach
the processor under a suitable form ; you can generally "enter" at any level
you want ("debug.exe" is always part of XP)...
--
Patrice
"Greg" <gm@mcpherran.c om> a écrit dans le message de
news:58******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com... Is it possible that in some future version of Windows, only .NET (CLR)
PE (Portable Executables) .exe will be enabled to run. I.e. the OS will
not support running of native x86 code .exes/dlls?
I understand native is needed for drivers etc. but at some point the
driver spec may even require MSIL and MSIL will add instructions to support
drivers.
--
Greg McPherran
www.McPherran.com
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics | |
by: James Cameron |
last post by:
Hi I'm developing a program and the client is worried about future
reuse of the code. Say 5, 10, 15 years down the road. This will be a
major factor in selecting the development language. Any comments on
past experience, research articles, comments on the matter would be
much appreciated. I suspect something like C would be the best based
on comments I received from the VB news group.
Thanks for the help in advance
James Cameron
|
by: M. Scott Blalock |
last post by:
Can I build non-.net framework (native windows) apps with
VS-.Net?
M. Scott Blalock
|
by: Andy Chau |
last post by:
Is there a .NET or C# to native x86 compiler? I am not looking for just a
prejitter progrom like ngen, but a true native compiler like the gcc for
java if there is such a thing.
Thanks
Andy
|
by: Uwe Range |
last post by:
Hi to all!
A customer of mine told me some days ago that her IT-people told her
ACCESS would not be such a good idea for continuing with our project,
because Access will not be continued in the future. I haven't heard of
this. Does anybody know more about it?
The IT-People usually prefer Oracle. If they really want to go in this
direction, could our Access-application (if continued) be used as a
front end with an Oracle back end? Does...
|
by: murl |
last post by:
I currently am programming apps using the vb.net language and haven't
seen to many problems with it, since migrating from vb6. I love the
enviornment, and the ease of use but wonder could my apps be better in
c#? I have studied vb6, vb.net, and c++, and am currently learning
alot about c#, and will be doing quite a few more applications in the
future. Technically i could learn any programming language and stick
with it, but is that one the...
| | |
by: |
last post by:
Everything seems to be moving to .NET and VC++ seems to be adding a lot of
managed code support every new release.
The questions: is unmanaged code in VC++ beeing phased out in favour of
managed code?
And suppose I still program in VC++ 6.0, can I safely assume that the code I
use in VC++ 6.0 will still be available in future VC++ versions.
Finally will VC++ 6.0 generated executables be still be able to run on futur
Windows versions and...
|
by: Jason Vene |
last post by:
I've looked at recent posts and not found material, but I'm new to the
board, so please forgive if this thread has come up before.
I'm facing a conundrum about development of business applications which have
robust user interface requirements (sorry, details must be kept private).
The UI will be required to present images, graphs (more akin to signals than
charts, like a wave file editor), various custom controls (some are full
scale...
|
by: Dave |
last post by:
I understand that VS.NET is supposed to compile native Win32 apps that
do not require the .Net runtime. If that's the case then there is
something else from the VS200x package that is required.
MSVCR80.DLL and MSVCR80D.DLL are present and accounted for in
Windows\System32. This is something else.
Message says that the application configuration is incorrect. I just
compiled a simple "Hello.cpp" app that exhibits the same behavior so...
|
by: jacob navia |
last post by:
A recent article on CNN described the problem that phone makers
are facing.
(http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/biztech/05/29/cellphone.usability.ap/index.html)
Most people are rejecting the new "supercharged"
cell phones because they just do not want to learn the
incredible complex menus and stuff that you need to use them.
The new phones are just too complicated to use.
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
| | |
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
|
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| | |
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |
