Generating thumbnails

[Barely Audible]

Guys

I was wondering if it was possible to have a js file that, when the page
loaded, it automatically generated a a set of thumbnails from directory
of the page on the web server?

Or would this create an unacceptable security hazard?

TTFN
Barely

[-Lost]

Barely Audible wrote:

Guys

What about the gals, huh? You chauvinistic pig. ;)

I was wondering if it was possible to have a js file that, when the page
loaded, it automatically generated a a set of thumbnails from directory
of the page on the web server?

Well, sure you can. However, there is a problem. I'll tell you at the
end of my post.

var imgs = ['my_mom', 'my_child', 'some other picture', 'pron'];

for (var i = 0, l = imgs.length; i < l) i++)
{
var new_img = document.create Element('img');
new_img.src = imgs[i] + '.jpg'; // or you could store the extension
document.getEle mentsByTagName( 'body')[0].appendChild(ne w_img);
}

Or you could just loop the array and write the results to the page using
the write method or innerHTML.

Or would this create an unacceptable security hazard?

The problem is by not creating thumbnails server-side or at least with
an image resizing application, you are creating unnecessary loading
times. Not to mention the fact that you end up loading too much
information in the user's browser or other viewing device.

Think on this. If I have ten images that are each 10 megabytes, then
the user has to load 100 megabytes of information just to view
thumbnails that you resize via CSS or JavaScript.

Serve them resampled thumbnails and you eliminate this problem.

--
-Lost
Remove the extra words to reply by e-mail. Don't e-mail me. I am
kidding. No I am not.

[-Lost]

-Lost wrote:

for (var i = 0, l = imgs.length; i < l) i++)

for (var i = 0, l = imgs.length; i < l; i++)

--
-Lost
Remove the extra words to reply by e-mail. Don't e-mail me. I am
kidding. No I am not.

[Barely Audible]

oink oink Guilty as charged ;-)

You have a valid point... as regards file size fortunately they do not
get that size and double figures KB is more the norm. The problem is
that the contents of the directory changes 10-15 times a day! I would be
forever redoing thumbnails if I had to do it manually :-(

You know of an example of this type of script in action?

-Lost wrote:

Barely Audible wrote:

>Guys

What about the gals, huh? You chauvinistic pig. ;)

>I was wondering if it was possible to have a js file that, when the page
loaded, it automatically generated a a set of thumbnails from directory
of the page on the web server?

Well, sure you can. However, there is a problem. I'll tell you at the
end of my post.

var imgs = ['my_mom', 'my_child', 'some other picture', 'pron'];

for (var i = 0, l = imgs.length; i < l) i++)
{
var new_img = document.create Element('img');
new_img.src = imgs[i] + '.jpg'; // or you could store the extension
document.getEle mentsByTagName( 'body')[0].appendChild(ne w_img);
}

Or you could just loop the array and write the results to the page using
the write method or innerHTML.

>Or would this create an unacceptable security hazard?

The problem is by not creating thumbnails server-side or at least with
an image resizing application, you are creating unnecessary loading
times. Not to mention the fact that you end up loading too much
information in the user's browser or other viewing device.

Think on this. If I have ten images that are each 10 megabytes, then
the user has to load 100 megabytes of information just to view
thumbnails that you resize via CSS or JavaScript.

Serve them resampled thumbnails and you eliminate this problem.

[Rene Tschaggelar]

Barely Audible wrote:

oink oink Guilty as charged ;-)

You have a valid point... as regards file size fortunately they do not
get that size and double figures KB is more the norm. The problem is
that the contents of the directory changes 10-15 times a day! I would be
forever redoing thumbnails if I had to do it manually :-(

You know of an example of this type of script in action?

Do it on the server once. And not on the client.

Rene