473,805 Members | 2,034 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
+ Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Verdana font. Why not?

I am a bit curious about this.

The graphic design people I work with say it is their preferred font for
web pages. The reason being that it is "kinder" to the eye both in terms
of shape and size.

The HTML "hardcore elititst" profess that it is a useless font because
it is too big compared to other fonts.

Personally I do not care one way or the other, but I generally trust
graphic designers more than programmers and rules lawyers when it comes
to pure design.

It seems to me that the only argument against using Verdana is that a
large number of browsers do not support it and therefore it causes their
pages to render with a very small font.

Can anyone honestly say they do not have the Verdana font installed?
Jul 21 '05
300 18490
"kchayka" wrote in comp.infosystem s.www.authoring.stylesheets:
weather.com falls into that group, methinks. But since their latest bit
of redesign, I'm actively looking for another weather source.


wunderground.co m

--

Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
Jul 21 '05 #211
Tim
SeaPlusPlus <Se*********@ho tmail.com> posted:
Truth is h1 through h6 is just a syntax handle to designate font and
font size (among other properties) larger and smaller.


The *truth* is that h tags are *not* font tags, they're *heading*
elements--they're "headings" for some adjacent content. As such, it's
complete nonsense for them to be smaller, by default (or otherwise) than
the adjacent text. The bad examples demonstrated by various browsers are
not any justifiable support for any notion that it's a good idea for
headings to be smaller than body text.

--
If you insist on e-mailing me, use the reply-to address (it's real but
temporary). But please reply to the group, like you're supposed to.

This message was sent without a virus, please delete some files yourself.
Jul 21 '05 #212
me wrote:
Thank you. We are in agreement that millions of successful sites
that enjoy great popularity use fixed font sizes and non-fluid
layouts.


Yep, I knew you'd try and figure out a way to turn that around...

--
-bts
-This space intentionally left blank.
Jul 21 '05 #213
me
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.*********@ex ample.invalid> wrote in message
news:3a******** *****@individua l.net...
me wrote:
Thank you. We are in agreement that millions of successful sites
that enjoy great popularity use fixed font sizes and non-fluid
layouts.


Yep, I knew you'd try and figure out a way to turn that around...


I concluded that we agreed on this point, am I wrong? My original point was
only an acknowledgement of the wide spread use of those methods of site
design.
Signed,
me
Jul 21 '05 #214
In article <11************ @corp.supernews .com>, anonymous@_.com enlightened
us with...

When all the popular kids did drugs (got drunk, got laid, whatever) in
school, did you do it, too?
There are a lot of valid reasons to do things.
"Because other people do it" isn't one of them.


I infer from your comment that you disagree but you didn't specify exactly
how.


I don't necessarily disagree with your statement that a lot of sites do
certain things. I disagree only with the notion that just because they do
things, you should do them or it is acceptable to do them. Whatever that
"them" might be.

If all the "popular" sites started using Flash navigation, that wouldn't make
it okay in general for any one site to use Flash navigation. You have to
individually look at what a site is meant to do, who it is geared for, and so
on. Same goes for javascript. A lot of sites use javascript, but if they use
it to do base functionality (that is, if you disable script, their site
breaks), there are serious cons to that. Whether those cons are enough to
change the design to not rely on script is highly application dependent. That
goes for anything, be it script, flash, applets, or hard-coded fonts. If you
get a lot of visually impaired visitors, they'll get pretty pissed about
hard-coded fonts. If you don't, I bet no one will even notice.

My 2 cents.
I'm not as purist as most people in this NG, but I don't see a reason to use
something simply because it *can* be used. And I am highly into doing the
most you can do to ensure your stuff doesn't kill people's browsers, even if
the browsers are old. May not WORK in them, but it shouldn't crash them,
either. If I can make a site do all I want it to do (or, more importantly,
all my client wants it to do) AND validate AND work in the most browsers, I
do that.

--
--
~kaeli~
Support your local medical examiner: die strangely!
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace

Jul 21 '05 #215
me wrote:
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.*********@ex ample.invalid> wrote in
message news:3a******** *****@individua l.net...
me wrote:
Thank you. We are in agreement that millions of successful
sites that enjoy great popularity use fixed font sizes and
non-fluid layouts.


Yep, I knew you'd try and figure out a way to turn that around...


I concluded that we agreed on this point, am I wrong? My original
point was only an acknowledgement of the wide spread use of those
methods of site design.


The only thing we agree upon is that millions of sites use fixed font
sizes (and non-fluid layouts, which is another subject). We do not
agree that this is the reason for their popularity.

Popularity can only be gained by the content itself, by the reputation
of the company, and by the lack of such content and reputation elsewhere.

--
-bts
-This space intentionally left blank.
Jul 21 '05 #216
In article <11************ *@corp.supernew s.com>, anonymous@_.com enlightened
us with...
We may just as well assume that if they really want to buy that
[product] they will *endure* it.


Or override the font size *if* they require it.

They can't (at least in MSIE, still the most used browser out there).
That's the problem with fixed font sizes. If they could just change it, it
wouldn't be an issue.

All they can do is use their own style sheet altogether, which would totally
break those types of layouts to the point of unusability.

--
--
~kaeli~
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishab le
from magic.
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace

Jul 21 '05 #217
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, kaeli wrote:
Or override the font size *if* they require it.


They can't (at least in MSIE, still the most used browser out there).


Overriding fixed font sizing is in the accessibility menu. There are
also 3rd-party add-ons to make it easier (sorry, don't have a URL
handy, 'cause I rarely use IE, other than for applying security fixes
to Windoze).

Jul 21 '05 #218
me
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.*********@ex ample.invalid> wrote in message
news:3a******** *****@individua l.net...
me wrote:
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.*********@ex ample.invalid> wrote in
message news:3a******** *****@individua l.net...
me wrote:

Thank you. We are in agreement that millions of successful
sites that enjoy great popularity use fixed font sizes and
non-fluid layouts.

Yep, I knew you'd try and figure out a way to turn that around...
I concluded that we agreed on this point, am I wrong? My original
point was only an acknowledgement of the wide spread use of those
methods of site design.


The only thing we agree upon is that millions of sites use fixed font
sizes (and non-fluid layouts, which is another subject). We do not
agree that this is the reason for their popularity.


I never said that was the *reason* for their popularity. If fluid design and
propotional fonts are superior then that would be the preominate design
method at popular sites (or all sites), but it's not is it?
Popularity can only be gained by the content itself, by the reputation
of the company, and by the lack of such content and reputation elsewhere.


Agreed. If visitors feel sufficiently motivated they may go elsewhere. IMO
if there were sufficient evidence that the use of fixed font sizes and
non-fluid site design were hurting their sites then designers of popular
sites may well abandon those methods. If that happens I will too.
Signed,
me
Jul 21 '05 #219
me
"kaeli" <ti******@NOSPA M.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:MP******** *************** *@nntp.lucent.c om...
In article <11************ *@corp.supernew s.com>, anonymous@_.com enlightened us with...
We may just as well assume that if they really want to buy that
[product] they will *endure* it.
Or override the font size *if* they require it.


They can't (at least in MSIE, still the most used browser out there).
That's the problem with fixed font sizes. If they could just change it, it
wouldn't be an issue.


I can do it in IE: Tools, Options, Accesibility, Ignore font sizes.
All they can do is use their own style sheet altogether, which would totally break those types of layouts to the point of unusability.


Please give example URL of a popular site broken to the point of being
unusable by overriding font size.
Signed,
me
Jul 21 '05 #220

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

2
2259
by: Anand | last post by:
Hello, I'm using the following style and am having a problem that Arial get's rendered with fuzzy edges in the browser IE6: ..headline { font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:16px; font-weight:bold; color:#007550; line-height:16px; } If I use the same style, but with Verdana, the script has sharp edges. ..headline { font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:16px;
13
3159
by: Mary Ellen Curtin | last post by:
I love Verdana and Georgia, because I can read them. I've read back postings here on why the usual font-family: Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif spec is less than ideal, because (as I understand it) e.g. "a" in 12pt Verdana is actually a different real size than it is in 12-pt Arial. That, of course, is one reason I find Verdana especially legible and lovable.
75
3769
by: Karl Smith | last post by:
Anyone who has read c.i.w.a.* for more than a few weeks knows that one of the pet hates of the CIWAHians is Verdana (it's a typeface, BTW). Future archeologists stumbling across these messages out of context could be forgiven for thinking "Verdana" must be some kind of dangerous animal. We must get rid of it, before it gets us! Oddly, they can never seem to articulate *why* they dislike Verdana, other than some vague assertion that it...
8
2263
by: kchayka | last post by:
<URL:http://www.w3.org/QA/Tips/font-size> In the "recommneded practices", I don't agree with their second bullet point, but the last 2 bullets sound like really bad advice, at least in a WWW context. How can they, in good conscience, advocate using font-size-adjust when it is virtually unsupported, besides probably being dropped from the next spec update? If they just made some disclaimers about browser support or font availability on...
7
3943
by: Randall Parker | last post by:
Using IE 6.x (whatever is the latest) on Windows 2000. For these two CSS definitions if I remove the 2 lines that have the "mso-" font family definitions (mso-fareast-font-family, and mso-bidi-font-family) then the "SmallerText" assigned as a class to a div tag produces larger text than the "SmallerText2". So x-small is treated as a bigger font size than plain old small. How the heck is one supposed to know all the MS stuff one needs...
0
9596
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it. First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
0
10604
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed. This is as boiled down as I can make it. Here is my compilation command: g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp Here is the code in...
1
10361
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
0
10103
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
0
9179
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own.... Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
1
7644
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM). In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules. He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms. Adolph will...
0
6874
by: conductexam | last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one. At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image. Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
2
3839
muto222
by: muto222 | last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
3
3006
bsmnconsultancy
by: bsmnconsultancy | last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.