"Marc" <M.***********@uva.nl> wrote in message
news:ae**************************@posting.google.c om...
MLH <CR**@NorthState.net> wrote in message
news:<53********************************@4ax.com>. ..
Anyone tried something reliable. Need to implement
sol'n to reliably create RTF's of Access reports readable
by WordPad.
MLH,
I don't have Access 2.0 around, but in my 97 and 2k-version the
rtf-export facility is available and seems to work when I test
something and open the results in Win 98 Wordpad. What is so
unreliable about it ?
Total loss of all graphical objects (not necessarily a big problem depending on the
report).
Imperfect implementation of tab positions.
The horizontal real estate requirements are not the same for phrases in the Access
Report versus the same phrases in Word. This leads to the following problems:
Following the same rules as word-wrap, words at the far right of controls can be
truncated. If even one letter won't fit, the entire word is dropped. Making all
controls wider than they need to be in Access "might" avoid this one.
Any control that has CanGrow enabled can experience truncation of entire lines.
Extra Line-Returns inserted into the content usually leaving just one or two words on
the previous line.
Troubleshooting these problems is complicated by the fact that the issues vary from
record to record, report to report, and might even be influenced by the default
printer driver being used by the person doing the export. I have definitely seen
cases where user A would produce an RTF report that looked ok, while user B's output
of the identical report would suffer loss of data.
AFAIK the only way to avoid the above problems is to use a mono-spaced font like
Courier. I can't even be positive about that as I never tested it thoroughly. The
main problem found in my investigation of this is that Word tends to use a slightly
narrower (or is it wider?) space character for a given font than the Access report.
Actual characters seem to be sized the same. I "assume" that this would not be the
case with a mono-spaced font which would then avoid the problem. Most users though
find mono-spaced fonts too unattractive to want to use them.