"Lyle Fairfield" <ly***********@ aim.comwrote in
news:11******** **************@ p79g2000cwp.goo glegroups.com:
>Soundex is an alpha-numeric code Therefore it must be stored
in a text field, if stored at all.
Is this a good thing?
There are much better phonetic coding systems that have been
developed. But in any case something calculable should not be
stored.
>
Am I correct that most common adaptations of the algorithm
will produce
Fairfield -F614
Pharefield -P614
Yes. That is the definition of the Soundex code. But they have
their own names. You might argue that Soundex, like Kleenex, has
become a generic descriptor, but we're getting off the topic.
while if we used all numerics we would have
1614
for both?
Or adaptations that convert the Ph to an F, yielding F614 for
both variants. I'm sure you've seen Mark Twain's plan for the
improvement of spelling.
http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/87/2094.10.html
I suppose that in the 19th century the F and P were very
helpful for manual or paper searches. But today, many Access
users and developers have progressed into the latter stages of
the twentieth century. Perhaps that alpha differentiation is
no longer so helpful.
Of course, there may be some great reason for the initial
alpha character. I shall be happy to hear it.
Yes, so would I. However, it doesn't change my opinion that text
is the correct field type.
--
Bob Quintal
PA is y I've altered my email address.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from
http://www.teranews.com