when you guys have a solution for _ALL_ of those scenarios is when I stop

[susiedba]

when you guys have a solution for _ALL_ of those scenarios is when I
stop

VB 2005 doesn't support code reuse or portability

I want to know what I am supposed to do.. am I really still supposed
to cart around _TWO_ ide so that I can write VB6 scripts and test
them; and then rewrite them into VbScript?

and then I can take my VbScript code and paste it into Vb 2005 and
REWRITE IT _AGAIN_

WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?

[aaron.kempf]

what, Panzers didn't kick the shit out of your country?
or was it paratroopers

either way; it took about a WEEK right?

STFU or else I will send some more over the border

On Feb 14, 4:34 am, "C-Services Holland b.v."
<cshNOSPAMPLE.. [e-mail] :

susie...@hotmai l.com schreef:

maybe we all use AOL and we have a dialup account

eat a dick and stay on-topic, fag

if I wanted your opinion; I'd send a couple of panzers over

Right, and you all just happen to get the exact same IP address every
time you dialup. Give it up. Oh and panzers.. that's a different country.

--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

[aaron.kempf]

I am so sorry kid
you're trying to tell me that you _SELL_ prepackaged, commercial apps
using VB.net?

ROFL

VB? THAT IS A _KIDS_ LANGUAGE
and just because VB 2005 _MIGHT_ run on some copies of Vista _WITH A
PATCH AND A RECOMPILE_ that doesn't mean that VB 2005 is 'VIsta
Ready'

THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
THOSE MOTHER FUCKING DIPSHITS SHOULD HAVE HAD THE FORESIGHT TO MAKE IT
WORK WITHOUT A PATCH!!!!!!!!!! !!
MS wanted to name VB = 'Kids Programming Language' but someone already
used that phrase
the framework is _NOT_ a 'few mb larger'

the framework is _NOT_ on anyones' desktops.

they don't need to install jack shit to run vb6 programs. it is
included with WINDOWS, kid

On Feb 14, 4:29 am, "C-Services Holland b.v."
<cshNOSPAMPLE.. [e-mail] :

That is of no importance. It's on the CD they get when they buy the
program. Just as they need to install stuff for VB6 when they buy one
of our programs written in VB6. That's also not just 1 executable. The
only difference is, is that the .NET framework is a few MB's larger.

susie...@hotmai l.com schreef:

and please buddy; please tell me what percentage of DESKTOPS have the
framework on them?

thanks

--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

[aaron.kempf]

oh does the cute little euro-fag have 'a Vista Enterprise Computer'

why would you run out and buy Vista when you don't even use Office?

I MEAN WHERE THE HELL IS YOUR PRIORITIES?

Vista doesn't work on _ANY_ hardware.
DOTNET is not installed on _ANY_ desktops

MS has a 70% solution again; except this time it is a 10% solution.

WHY DOES VB6 AND C++ ALLOW YOU TO BUILD AN APP THAT WILL WORK NATIVELY
ON WINDOWS? <--- BECAUSE THEY MATTER
DotNot is _IRRELEVENT_

On Feb 14, 4:31 am, "C-Services Holland b.v."
<cshNOSPAMPLE.. [e-mail] :

susie...@hotmai l.com schreef:

I DISAGREE FAG

DOES NOT RUN ON VISTA

2002,2003 DOES NOT RUN ON VISTA

GLAD TO SEE THAT THEY PULLED A VISUAL FRED AGAIN

ROFL

You can disagree all you want. It's a fact that our program works just
fine on our Vista Enterprise computer.

--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

[aaron.kempf]

That's like telling the kids in Iraq to 'just adjust to the new way of
life (having American soldiers rape your moms and shoot your dads)'
IT MOTHER FUCKING IS NOT ACCEPTABLE BITCH

VB DOTNET DOES NOT WORK ON ANY DESKTOPS STICK A FUCKING CORK IN IT

VB6 _STILL_ WORKS EVERYWHERE



On Feb 9, 10:37 pm, "RobinS" <Rob...@NoSpam. yah.nonewrote:

The solution is for you to get over what you can't change and move on,
Aaron. I feel quite sorry for you.

Robin S.
-------------------------------------------<susie...@hotma il.comwrote in message

news:11******** **************@ a34g2000cwb.goo glegroups.com.. .

when you guys have a solution for _ALL_ of those scenarios is when I
stop

VB 2005 doesn't support code reuse or portability

I want to know what I am supposed to do.. am I really still supposed
to cart around _TWO_ ide so that I can write VB6 scripts and test
them; and then rewrite them into VbScript?

and then I can take my VbScript code and paste it into Vb 2005 and
REWRITE IT _AGAIN_

WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

[C-Services Holland b.v.]

aa*********@gma il.com schreef:

oh does the cute little euro-fag have 'a Vista Enterprise Computer'

You seem to have a fascination about homosexuals because you seem to
call everyone one. Maybe you should come out of the closet.

why would you run out and buy Vista when you don't even use Office?

Because we need to test our apps on current operating systems because
our customers are using or will be using it. But I guess cross platform
testing is a something you never heard of. You just figure it runs on
your development pc and that's it. Oh, and we didn't run out to buy it.
It's in the MSDN subscription.

I MEAN WHERE THE HELL IS YOUR PRIORITIES?

Priorities are to test it on the available platforms.

Vista doesn't work on _ANY_ hardware.
DOTNET is not installed on _ANY_ desktops

That is a bogus statement. If that were true then my computer would be
performing magic by running it. Ofcourse there's always some hardware
that doesn't run it. But that's the same as complaining back in '95 that
Win95 didn't run on your 386 with 16MB memory. Dotnet is installed on
plenty desktops if it's regularly updated. And if it's not just run the
friggin dotnetfx.exe.

WHY DOES VB6 AND C++ ALLOW YOU TO BUILD AN APP THAT WILL WORK NATIVELY
ON WINDOWS? <--- BECAUSE THEY MATTER

You said VB6 is a kiddie language. So does that matter? And no, our
classic VB apps don't work natively on windows.
They still need extra libraries to be installed.

DotNot is _IRRELEVENT_

Keep working in VB6, no one is stopping you.

--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

[C-Services Holland b.v.]

aa*********@gma il.com schreef:

I am so sorry kid
you're trying to tell me that you _SELL_ prepackaged, commercial apps
using VB.net?

ROFL

VB? THAT IS A _KIDS_ LANGUAGE
and just because VB 2005 _MIGHT_ run on some copies of Vista _WITH A
PATCH AND A RECOMPILE_ that doesn't mean that VB 2005 is 'VIsta
Ready'

Bullshit, the program was compiled on WinXP and it ran on a fresh Vista
install. Ah, and VB is a kids language is it. VB6 is also VB I guess you
want your kiddie language supported for the next millennium to come.
--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

[C-Services Holland b.v.]

aa*********@gma il.com schreef:

what, Panzers didn't kick the shit out of your country?
or was it paratroopers

either way; it took about a WEEK right?

STFU or else I will send some more over the border

Like the ships that were sunk in PH? That took all of a few hours right?

Anyway, time to *PLONK* your aliases now. This one and all of your other 15.

--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v

[aaron.kempf]

please tell me FAG how Dotnet is on a desktop if it gets updated
frequently.

is the framework a standard install? or is it an optional install at
Windows Update?

is that what you are referring to?

what percentage of END USERS want to install unnecessary components?
DO YOU REMEMBER NIMDA, CODE RED, BLASTER?

what percentage of END USERS want to install unnecessary components?
DO YOU REMEMBER NIMDA, CODE RED, BLASTER?
what percentage of END USERS want to install unnecessary components?
DO YOU REMEMBER NIMDA, CODE RED, BLASTER?
what percentage of END USERS want to install unnecessary components?
DO YOU REMEMBER NIMDA, CODE RED, BLASTER?
what percentage of END USERS want to install unnecessary components?
DO YOU REMEMBER NIMDA, CODE RED, BLASTER?

On Feb 15, 1:48 am, "C-Services Holland b.v."
<cshNOSPAMPLE.. [e-mail] :

aaron.ke...@gma il.com schreef:

oh does the cute little euro-fag have 'a Vista Enterprise Computer'

You seem to have a fascination about homosexuals because you seem to
call everyone one. Maybe you should come out of the closet.

why would you run out and buy Vista when you don't even use Office?

Because we need to test our apps on current operating systems because
our customers are using or will be using it. But I guess cross platform
testing is a something you never heard of. You just figure it runs on
your development pc and that's it. Oh, and we didn't run out to buy it.
It's in the MSDN subscription.

I MEAN WHERE THE HELL IS YOUR PRIORITIES?

Priorities are to test it on the available platforms.

Vista doesn't work on _ANY_ hardware.
DOTNET is not installed on _ANY_ desktops

That is a bogus statement. If that were true then my computer would be
performing magic by running it. Ofcourse there's always some hardware
that doesn't run it. But that's the same as complaining back in '95 that
Win95 didn't run on your 386 with 16MB memory. Dotnet is installed on
plenty desktops if it's regularly updated. And if it's not just run the
friggin dotnetfx.exe.

WHY DOES VB6 AND C++ ALLOW YOU TO BUILD AN APP THAT WILL WORK NATIVELY
ON WINDOWS? <--- BECAUSE THEY MATTER

You said VB6 is a kiddie language. So does that matter? And no, our
classic VB apps don't work natively on windows.
They still need extra libraries to be installed.

DotNot is _IRRELEVENT_

Keep working in VB6, no one is stopping you.

--
Rinze van Huizen
C-Services Holland b.v