Space function

[Pippo]

In Vb 6 exist the SPACE function
How to replace this function in vb dot net?

[Alex]

"Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hi************ ***@gmx.at> wrote in message
news:%2******** ********@tk2msf tngp13.phx.gbl. ..

As it's impossible to write VB.NET applications which don't reference
"Microsoft.Visu alBasic.dll", there is absolutely no reason for not using the
functionality of this library. Developing in VB.NET without using
'Microsoft.Visu alBasic' is developing with VB.NET without actually using it.

I noticed that there doesn't seem to exist a Microsoft.CShar p.dll. What's the
significance of that, if any?

[Alejandro Lapeyre]

It means that the capabilities added by the VisualBasic.dll can also be used
by c# users.
No need to define things twice.
Best regards,
Alejandro Lapeyre

"Alex" <pl******@no.me ssages> escribió en el mensaje
news:Oi******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP14.phx.gbl...

"Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hi************ ***@gmx.at> wrote in message
news:%2******** ********@tk2msf tngp13.phx.gbl. ..

As it's impossible to write VB.NET applications which don't reference
"Microsoft.Visu alBasic.dll", there is absolutely no reason for not using
the
functionality of this library. Developing in VB.NET without using
'Microsoft.Visu alBasic' is developing with VB.NET without actually using
it.

I noticed that there doesn't seem to exist a Microsoft.CShar p.dll. What's
the
significance of that, if any?

[Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]]

"Alejandro Lapeyre" <Al************ **@jotmail.com> schrieb:

It means that the capabilities added by the VisualBasic.dll can also be
used by c# users.
No need to define things twice.

LOL...

--
M S Herfried K. Wagner
M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
V B <URL:http://classicvb.org/petition/>

[Carlos J. Quintero [.NET MVP]]

http://www.ftponline.com/vsm/2004_08...ettingstarted/

;-)

--

Best regards,

Carlos J. Quintero

MZ-Tools: Productivity add-ins for Visual Studio .NET, VB6, VB5 and VBA
You can code, design and document much faster.
Free resources for add-in developers:
http://www.mztools.com

"Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hi************ ***@gmx.at> escribió en el mensaje
news:uU******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP10.phx.gbl. ..

"Alejandro Lapeyre" <Al************ **@jotmail.com> schrieb:

It means that the capabilities added by the VisualBasic.dll can also be
used by c# users.
No need to define things twice.

LOL...

--
M S Herfried K. Wagner
M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
V B <URL:http://classicvb.org/petition/>

[Cor Ligthert]

Carlos,

http://www.ftponline.com/vsm/2004_08...ettingstarted/

When I am able will I show it as soon as possible in the General newsgroup
to Jon Skeet, that will give a long thread again.

I once translated a VBNet sample literally to C# in the CSharp newsgroup
using this reference, however there was not any comment

:-)

Cor

[Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]]

Carlos,

"Carlos J. Quintero [.NET MVP]" <ca*****@NOSPAM sogecable.com> schrieb:

http://www.ftponline.com/vsm/2004_08...ettingstarted/

;-)

;-)

From the article:

| However, .NET makes it possible for C# developers to take advantage
| of all the power of Visual Basic .NET.

I doubt that ;-))).

--
M S Herfried K. Wagner
M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
V B <URL:http://classicvb.org/petition/>

[Carlos J. Quintero [.NET MVP]]

Hi Herfried and Cor,

I personally use VB.NET, although I tend to avoid Microsoft.Visua lBasic as
much as possible and during all these years I have found only this gem in
the Microsoft.Visua lBasic namespace: the
Microsoft.Visua lBasic.Informat ion.Typename(ob ject) function. It gives you
the actual type of a __ComObject when the debugger or the other .NET
Framework functions don´t give you a clue...
--

Best regards,

Carlos J. Quintero

MZ-Tools: Productivity add-ins for Visual Studio .NET, VB6, VB5 and VBA
You can code, design and document much faster.
Free resources for add-in developers:
http://www.mztools.com
"Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hi************ ***@gmx.at> escribió en el mensaje
news:%2******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP15.phx.gbl. ..

Carlos,

;-)

From the article:

| However, .NET makes it possible for C# developers to take advantage
| of all the power of Visual Basic .NET.

I doubt that ;-))).

[Alex]

"Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hi************ ***@gmx.at> wrote in message
news:%2******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP15.phx.gbl. ..

| However, .NET makes it possible for C# developers to take advantage
| of all the power of Visual Basic .NET.

I doubt that ;-))).
But, can the VB.NET developers take advantage of all of the features available
in C#?

"Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]" <hi************ ***@gmx.at> wrote in message
news:%2******** ********@tk2msf tngp13.phx.gbl. .. C# will support some additional type keywords and operators for dealing with
nullable types:

<URL:http://msdn2.microsoft .com/library/2cf62fcy(en-us,vs.80).aspx>

(I'm not trying to be argumentative here. I want to understand the
implications of the differences between the two.)

[Cor Ligthert]

Alex,

No, there are differences and probably those will stay because it are
different development teams.

For the VBNet development team it is of couse easier to get the same things
as in C# than in the opposite posistion.

C# is ECMA.

Just my thought,

Cor

[Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]]

Cor,

"Cor Ligthert" <no************ @planet.nl> schrieb:

For the VBNet development team it is of couse easier to get the same
things as in C# than in the opposite posistion.

C# is ECMA.

C# is standardized by ECMA, but Microsoft decides its roadmap.

--
M S Herfried K. Wagner
M V P <URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
V B <URL:http://classicvb.org/petition/>