I have an Access XP ADE application connected to a SQL Server 7.0 SP4
database. I have created a timestamp column in the main table.
Unfortunately, I am now getting persistent write conflict errors.
The order of operations are:
1. The application starts and loads the recordset into the form using a
stored procedure.
2. I modify a field and press a save button which uses me.dirty=false to
force a save.
3. The field is saved to the database. Using profiler I can observe the
modified field being saved. As I would expect, the update statement is
using the primary key and the timestamp column value. For the sake of this
discussion let's assume the value of the timestamp is 5ad9.
4. Without navigating off the record, I alter the same field (or a
different field) and press save again and a write conflict will appear.
Using profiler I can see the update statement that is attempting to update
the record. The update statement is using the previous value (5ad9) of the
timestamp column.
I thought that the timestamp column value is incremented each time the
record is updated. The ADE application does not appear to be recognizing
the new timestamp value.
Any help or advice you could give would be appreciated.
Thanks
George
3  3733 
Actually, ADPs/ADEs in Access 2000 have some really serious bugs with TIMESTAMP
columns, and I ended up having to stop using them in my ADP apps. I recommend
that you do the same. Yes, I know all the good reasons you should use
TIMESTAMPS, and I agree with them. Still, you will fail to make an Access 2002
ADP app of any complexity work properly with TIMESTAMP columns in your tables.
Give up now, and save yourself a lot of headaches.
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:13:27 -0500, "gwaddell" <no****@you.kno w> wrote: I have an Access XP ADE application connected to a SQL Server 7.0 SP4
database. I have created a timestamp column in the main table.
Unfortunatel y, I am now getting persistent write conflict errors.
The order of operations are:
1. The application starts and loads the recordset into the form using a
stored procedure.
2. I modify a field and press a save button which uses me.dirty=false to
force a save.
3. The field is saved to the database. Using profiler I can observe the
modified field being saved. As I would expect, the update statement is
using the primary key and the timestamp column value. For the sake of this
discussion let's assume the value of the timestamp is 5ad9.
4. Without navigating off the record, I alter the same field (or a
different field) and press save again and a write conflict will appear.
Using profiler I can see the update statement that is attempting to update
the record. The update statement is using the previous value (5ad9) of the
timestamp column.
I thought that the timestamp column value is incremented each time the
record is updated. The ADE application does not appear to be recognizing
the new timestamp value.
Any help or advice you could give would be appreciated.
Thanks
George
Thanks for the information. MS Access is not my regular work area either
and have been lucky
in the past been able to avoid working in it. But my luck has run out.
I've got more experience using ADO in VB 6 and I can use this info there as
well.
"Erland Sommarskog" <so****@algonet .se> wrote in message
news:Xn******** **************@ 127.0.0.1... gwaddell (no****@you.kno w) writes: I have an Access XP ADE application connected to a SQL Server 7.0 SP4
database. I have created a timestamp column in the main table.
Unfortunately, I am now getting persistent write conflict errors.
The order of operations are:
1. The application starts and loads the recordset into the form using a
stored procedure.
2. I modify a field and press a save button which uses me.dirty=false
to force a save.
3. The field is saved to the database. Using profiler I can observe
the modified field being saved. As I would expect, the update statement
is using the primary key and the timestamp column value. For the sake
of this discussion let's assume the value of the timestamp is 5ad9.
4. Without navigating off the record, I alter the same field (or a
different field) and press save again and a write conflict will appear.
Using profiler I can see the update statement that is attempting to
update the record. The update statement is using the previous value
(5ad9) of the timestamp column.
I thought that the timestamp column value is incremented each time the
record is updated. The ADE application does not appear to be
recognizing the new timestamp value.
But ADE cannot guess what the new value will be, since the timestamp
values are database wide. You must somehow get the new timestamp value back to
ADE when you have done your update.
This is not really my regular playing-ground, but I happened to read this
in a book on ADO Programming as late as today.
For this to work, you need:
. Set cursor-location to adUseClient.
. Set the dynamic property Update Resync to adResyncUpates. (This is a
bit mask, so add it to the current value.)
. Set the dynamic property Update Criteria to adCriteriaTimeS tamp.
--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, so****@algonet. se
Books Online for SQL Server SP3 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinf...2000/books.asp
Yes....I thought that the usual Microsoft help people were very quiet about
this issue.
"Steve Jorgensen" <no****@nospam. nospam> wrote in message
news:3h******** *************** *********@4ax.c om... Actually, ADPs/ADEs in Access 2000 have some really serious bugs with
TIMESTAMP columns, and I ended up having to stop using them in my ADP apps. I
recommend that you do the same. Yes, I know all the good reasons you should use
TIMESTAMPS, and I agree with them. Still, you will fail to make an Access
2002 ADP app of any complexity work properly with TIMESTAMP columns in your
tables. Give up now, and save yourself a lot of headaches.
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:13:27 -0500, "gwaddell" <no****@you.kno w> wrote:
I have an Access XP ADE application connected to a SQL Server 7.0 SP4
database. I have created a timestamp column in the main table.
Unfortunatel y, I am now getting persistent write conflict errors.
The order of operations are:
1. The application starts and loads the recordset into the form using a
stored procedure.
2. I modify a field and press a save button which uses me.dirty=false to
force a save.
3. The field is saved to the database. Using profiler I can observe the
modified field being saved. As I would expect, the update statement is
using the primary key and the timestamp column value. For the sake of
thisdiscussion let's assume the value of the timestamp is 5ad9.
4. Without navigating off the record, I alter the same field (or a
different field) and press save again and a write conflict will appear.
Using profiler I can see the update statement that is attempting to
updatethe record. The update statement is using the previous value (5ad9) of
thetimestamp column.
I thought that the timestamp column value is incremented each time the
record is updated. The ADE application does not appear to be recognizing
the new timestamp value.
Any help or advice you could give would be appreciated.
Thanks
George This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics | |
by: lkrubner |
last post by:
This might be an idiot question, but how do you group by timestamps by
date? I mean, given a large number of timestamps, spanning many months,
how do grab them and say how many are from each day? If the timestamps
measure visits to a web site, how to easily say there were 45 visits on
January 4th?
The first idea that occurs to me is to put them all in an array and
then loop through the array and use date() on each, one at a time,...
|
by: Robert Schuldenfrei |
last post by:
Dear NG,
I have not heard from anyone about a good book that deals with the
concurrency issue in SQL Server using C#. I have PROMISED Nick I would not
use record locking and I have used an old row / new row approach. (see next
paragraph for my reply to Nick) I would like to use Timestamps and
Transactions to produce an iron-clad and efficient application in a
multi-user environment. Can anyone recommend such a book?
OK Nick, I...
|
by: Chumma Dede |
last post by:
Hi,
I need to code a DLL in .NET which logs the response times for our asp.net
multi-tier application. The problem is we need to log the timestamps at
multiple stages in a process lifecycle roundtrip without too much overhead.
We have two webservers which are load balanced and the back end tiers
include Biztalk and several remoting components all of which should ideally
use this same dll for logging timestamps in a central location in...
|
by: Craig G |
last post by:
im not too sure how i should be storing the SQL2000 timestamps
basically i return a dataset which is used to populate an editable grid.
this dataset contains the timestamp. how should i be storing the timestamps
for each grid row? is it possible to hold them in the grid in someway? or do
i need to look at other means
ive only used Oracle Timestamps before and they where just decimal
timestamps which made it easy!! could just store them...
|
by: Erwin Van de Velde |
last post by:
Hi,
I'm building a central logging system for security applications as my master
thesis, but I've run into some troubles:
Different applications make database logs using different formats:
- Timestamps as timestamps or as numeric values
- IP addresses in dotted notation (aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd) or as numeric values
I'd like to convert these to the same type, so that I can compare them. Two
| | |
by: mikek |
last post by:
Good Morning from Detroit,
I am working on a project to Connect and manipulatee data in a SQLServer Data base, from a LINUX server using PERL. and SOAP
We decided to use SOAP:Lite. (there are sooo many ways to express the scripts Using Lite, that it is making my head spin, that's another story though)
I am interested in using the OASIS Standard WSS UserNameToken Profile Security protocol, but I am baffled on the proper way to write the...
|
by: pnjones |
last post by:
I am getting the write conflicit when 2 users access the same record
the first one to save is allowed but the second user gets the message
Write conflicit with the save option greyed out.
I have seen this error on many forums and implemented the following
See the default for int to 0
Added a field with type timestamp
Updated all the records to ensure all fields contained valid records
|
by: loisk |
last post by:
Hi,
Does anybody know why I am getting the "Write Conflicts" error when I am opening my ACCESS database this morning even before making any changes at all?
|
by: xkenneth |
last post by:
All,
Just a quick question. I want to be able to have a data structure
that organizes data (timestamps I'm working with) sequentially, so
that i can easily retrieve the first x amount of timeStamps without
iterating over a list. My thought was to use a binary tree, am i
overthinking the problem to try and implement this structure inside of
python? I was also hoping this would already be done for me.
Regards,
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
| | |
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
|
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| | |
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |
