Thank you developers for 2.3

[David Lees]

Flawless install and it ran my very simple minded (try not to laugh)
nested loop integer arithmetic benchmark twice as fast as 2.2.3
version 2.3 5.04 sec
version 2.2.3 9.77 sec

import time

def speedTest(N):
t1 = time.time()
k = 0
for i in xrange(N):
for j in xrange(N):
k += (i+j)

t2 = time.time()
return t2-t1

print speedTest(3000)

david lees

[Tino Lange]

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 05:35:02 GMT, David Lees
<ab***************@verizon.net> wrote:

Flawless install and it ran my very simple minded (try not to laugh)
nested loop integer arithmetic benchmark twice as fast as 2.2.3
version 2.3 5.04 sec
version 2.2.3 9.77 sec

Hi!

By the way: What was/is the speed with 2.1.x on the same system?

Cheers,

Tino

[Raymond Hettinger]

"David Lees"

Flawless install and it ran my very simple minded (try not to laugh)
nested loop integer arithmetic benchmark twice as fast as 2.2.3
version 2.3 5.04 sec
version 2.2.3 9.77 sec

import time

def speedTest(N):
t1 = time.time()
k = 0
for i in xrange(N):
for j in xrange(N):
k += (i+j)

t2 = time.time()
return t2-t1

print speedTest(3000)

david lees

You must really trust us.
The benchmark compares the speed
but doesn't check to see if the answers are the same ;-)
Raymond Hettinger

[Nicola Mingotti]

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:21:09 +0200, Tino Lange wrote:

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 05:35:02 GMT, David Lees
<ab***************@verizon.net> wrote:

....
2.3 5.04 sec
version 2.2.3 9.77 sec

...
By the way: What was/is the speed with 2.1.x on the same system?

On 2.1.3 speedTest doesn't work . It gives OverflowError: integer
addition . It 's because in that version integer aren't converted
into Long Int when necessary .

....
t1 = time.time()
k = 0L
....
for j in xrange(n):
for i in xrange(n):
k += i + j
t1 = time.time()
return t1 - t0

[Cousin Stanley]

| You must really trust us.
| The benchmark compares the speed
| but doesn't check to see if the answers are the same

Python 2.2.1 Python 2.3b1

k ..... 26991000000 k ..... 26991000000

et .... 108.370000005 et .... 51.4100000858

Answers look OK and 2x speed improvement
seems to prevail for slower processors as well ....

Using Win98 @ 250 MHz ....

--
Cousin Stanley
Human Being
Phoenix, Arizona

[Aahz]

In article <aO*****************@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>,
David Lees <ab***************@verizon.net> wrote:

Flawless install and it ran my very simple minded (try not to laugh)
nested loop integer arithmetic benchmark twice as fast as 2.2.3
version 2.3 5.04 sec
version 2.2.3 9.77 sec

import time

def speedTest(N):
t1 = time.time()
k = 0
for i in xrange(N):
for j in xrange(N):
k += (i+j)

t2 = time.time()
return t2-t1

print speedTest(3000)

That primarily tests the speed of the warnings module. Test starting
with 0L instead.
--
Aahz (aa**@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/

This is Python. We don't care much about theory, except where it intersects
with useful practice. --Aahz

[David Lees]

Added initialization to a long and printout of both time and result.
Looks like faith was justified, but good point Raymond.

David Lees
------------
import time

def speedTest(N):
t1 = time.time()
k = 0L
for i in xrange(N):
for j in xrange(N):
k += (i+j)

t2 = time.time()
return t2-t1,k

print speedTest(3000)
---------
Python 2.3

(5.406999945640564, 26991000000L)
Python 2.2.3 (10.465000033378601, 26991000000L)