start a multi-sockets server (a socket/per thread) with different ports but same host

Jean-Paul,
Thanks a lot. The code is working. The python twisted is new to me too.
Here are my three more questions:
1. Since the code need to be started in a wxpyhon GUI (either by
clicking a button or up with the GUI), do I have to run the code in a
thread (sorry, I have not tried it yet)?
2. How can I grab the client data in the code? Can you write two lines
for that? I really appreciate that.
3. After I change
self.transport. write(''.join(s elf.data))
to
self.transport. write(''.join(d ata))
and scan all the ports with the following code twice (run twice).
First round scanning says "succefully connected". But second round
scanning says "failed". I have to restart your demo code to make it
work.

Ouyang
import sys, threading, socket

class scanner(threadi ng.Thread):
tlist = [] # list of all current scanner threads
maxthreads = int(sys.argv[2]) # max number of threads we're
allowing
evnt = threading.Event () # event to signal OK to create more
threads
lck = threading.Lock( ) # lock to guard tlist
def __init__(self,t n,host):
threading.Threa d.__init__(self )
#self.threadnum = tn # thread ID/port number
self.threadnum = 2000+tn # thread ID/port number
self.host = host # checking ports on this host
def run(self):
s = socket.socket(s ocket.AF_INET,s ocket.SOCK_STRE AM)
try:
s.connect((self .host, self.threadnum) )
print "%d: successfully connected" % self.threadnum
s.close()
except:
print "%d: connection failed" % self.threadnum
# thread is about to exit; remove from list, and signal OK if we
# had been up against the limit
scanner.lck.acq uire()
scanner.tlist.r emove(self)
print "%d: now active --" % self.threadnum, scanner.tlist
if len(scanner.tli st) == scanner.maxthre ads-1:
scanner.evnt.se t()
scanner.evnt.cl ear()
scanner.lck.rel ease()
def newthread(pn,hs t):
scanner.lck.acq uire()
sc = scanner(pn,hst)
scanner.tlist.a ppend(sc)
scanner.lck.rel ease()
sc.start()
print "%d: starting check" % pn
print "%d: now active --" % pn, scanner.tlist
newthread = staticmethod(ne wthread)

def main():
host = sys.argv[1]
#for i in range(1,100):
for i in range(20):
scanner.lck.acq uire()
print "%d: attempting check" % i
# check to see if we're at the limit before starting a new thread
if len(scanner.tli st) >= scanner.maxthre ads:
# too bad, need to wait until not at thread limit
print "%d: need to wait" % i
scanner.lck.rel ease()
scanner.evnt.wa it()
else:
scanner.lck.rel ease()
scanner.newthre ad(i,host)
for sc in scanner.tlist:
sc.join()

if __name__ == '__main__':
main()


Jean-Paul Calderone 写�：

On 12 Aug 2006 09:00:02 -0700, zxo102 <zx****@gmail.c omwrote:

Hi,
I am doing a small project using socket server and thread in python.
This is first time for me to use socket and thread things.
Here is my case. I have 20 socket clients. Each client send a set
of sensor data per second to a socket server. The socket server will
do two things: 1. write data into a file via bsddb; 2. forward the data
to a GUI written in wxpython.
I am thinking the code should work as follow (not sure it is
feasible)
20 threads, each thread takes care of a socket server with a
different port.
I want all socket servers start up and wait for client connection.
In the attached demo code, It stops at the startup of first socket
server somewhere in the following two lines and waits for client call:

Threads aren't the best way to manage the concurrency present in this
application. Instead, consider using non-blocking sockets with an
event notification system. For example, using Twisted, your program
might look something like this:

from twisted.interne t import reactor, protocol, defer

class CumulativeEchoP rotocol(protoco l.Protocol):
def connectionMade( self):
# Stop listening on the port which accepted this connection
self.factory.po rt.stopListenin g()

# Set up a list in which to collect the bytes which we receive
self.received = []
def connectionLost( self, reason):
# Notify the main program that this connection has been lost, so
# that it can exit the process when there are no more connections.
self.factory.on ConnectionLost. callback(self)

def dataReceived(se lf, data):
# Accumulate the new data in our list
self.received.a ppend(data)
# And then echo the entire list so far back to the client
self.transport. write(''.join(s elf.data))

def allConnectionsL ost():
# When all connections have been dropped, stop the reactor so the
# process can exit.
reactor.stop()

def main():
# Set up a list to collect Deferreds in. When all of these Deferreds
# have had callback() invoked on them, the reactor will be stopped.
completionDefer reds = []
for i in xrange(20):
# Make a new factory for this port
f = protocol.Server Factory()

# Make a Deferred for this port's connection-lost event and make
# it available to the protocol by way of the factory.
d = defer.Deferred( )
f.onConnectionL ost = d
completionDefer reds.append(d)
f.protocol = CumulativeEchoP rotocol

# Start listening on a particular port number with this factory
port = reactor.listenT CP(2000 + i + 1, f)

# Make the port object available to the protocol as well, so that
# it can be shut down when a connection is made.
f.port = port

# Create a Deferred which will only be called back when all the other
# Deferreds in this list have been called back.
d = defer.DeferredL ist(completionD eferreds)

# And tell it to stop the reactor when it fires
d.addCallback(l ambda result: allConnectionsL ost())

# Start the reactor so things can start happening
reactor.run()

if __name__ == '__main__':
main()

Hope this helps,

Jean-Paul

Jean-Paul,
I just start to learn Twisted. Here is my simple case: I can find
the data sent by clients in dataReceived but I don't know which
client/which port the data is from. After I know where the data comes
from, I can do different things there, for example, write them into
different files via bsddb. I am not sure if it is the correct way to
do it.
def dataReceived(se lf, data):
# Accumulate the new data in our list
self.received.a ppend(data)
# And then echo the entire list so far back to the client
self.transport. write(''.join(d ata))

print "============da ta: ", data
print " which Port? : ", self.factory.po rt # unforunately it is
an object here.

# if Port == 2001:
# write the data into a file via bsddb
# if Port == 2002:
# write the data into another file via bsddb
# etc .....
Ouyang

Jean-Paul Calderone 写�：

On 12 Aug 2006 10:44:29 -0700, zxo102 <zx****@gmail.c omwrote:

Jean-Paul,
Thanks a lot. The code is working. The python twisted is new to me too.
Here are my three more questions:
1. Since the code need to be started in a wxpyhon GUI (either by
clicking a button or up with the GUI), do I have to run the code in a
thread (sorry, I have not tried it yet)?

You can try to use Twisted's wxPython integration support:

http://twistedmatrix.com/projects/co...or.html#auto15

But note the warnings about how well it is likely to work. Using a separate
thread might be the best solution.

2. How can I grab the client data in the code? Can you write two lines
for that? I really appreciate that.

I'm not sure what you mean. The data is available in the `received' attribute
of the protocol instance. Any code which needs to manipulate the data can get
that list and do whatever it likes with it.

3. After I change
self.transport. write(''.join(s elf.data))
to
self.transport. write(''.join(d ata))
and scan all the ports with the following code twice (run twice).
First round scanning says "succefully connected". But second round
scanning says "failed". I have to restart your demo code to make it
work.

I intentionally added code which shuts the server off after the first round
of connections is completed, since that seemed to be what your example
program was doing. If you don't want this, just remove the shutdown code.

Jean-Paul

zxo102 wrote:

I am doing a small project using socket server and thread in python.
This is first time for me to use socket and thread things.
Here is my case. I have 20 socket clients. Each client send a set
of sensor data per second to a socket server. The socket server will
do two things: 1. write data into a file via bsddb; 2. forward the data
to a GUI written in wxpython.
I am thinking the code should work as follow (not sure it is
feasible)
20 threads, each thread takes care of a socket server with a
different port.
I want all socket servers start up and wait for client connection.
In the attached demo code, It stops at the startup of first socket
server somewhere in the following two lines and waits for client call:

lstn.listen(5)
(clnt,ap) = lstn.accept()

It will block there, waiting for connection.

Any ideas how to handle these 20 clients? Really appreciate your
suggestions.

One reserved port for each client strikes me as whacked,
as does coding a server to handle exactly 20 of them. Since
you say this is your first socket server, maybe you just
haven't seen the usual techniques.

Normally, one listener socket accepts all the connections.
Each call to accept() returns a new, independent socket for the
connection. You can then start a thread to handle the new
socket. Untested:
listener = socket.socket(s ocket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STR EAM)
listener.bind(( '', 2000))
listener.listen (5)
while True: # or some should_continue () thing
sock, _ = listener.accept ()
thread.start_ne w_thread(servic e_function, (sock,))
# Or start threads via class Threading
To update the GUI, you could use the Queue from the Python
library, and call wxPostEvent to tell the GUI go wake up and
check the queue.
--
--Bryan

Bryan,
Thanks for your note. Finally, I have made "one listener socket for
all the connections" work plus Queue-communication between the threads
in wxpython Gui and the threads for socket connections.
Trying to make that twisted example code in this topic for "one
listener socket-all the connections" but failed. That twisted example
only accepts one client connection. I have printed out the Twisted help
file (256 pages). Too much to read.

Ouyang
Bryan Olson 写�：

zxo102 wrote:

I am doing a small project using socket server and thread in python.
This is first time for me to use socket and thread things.
Here is my case. I have 20 socket clients. Each client send a set
of sensor data per second to a socket server. The socket server will
do two things: 1. write data into a file via bsddb; 2. forward the data
to a GUI written in wxpython.
I am thinking the code should work as follow (not sure it is
feasible)
20 threads, each thread takes care of a socket server with a
different port.
I want all socket servers start up and wait for client connection.
In the attached demo code, It stops at the startup of first socket
server somewhere in the following two lines and waits for client call:

lstn.listen(5)
(clnt,ap) = lstn.accept()

It will block there, waiting for connection.

Any ideas how to handle these 20 clients? Really appreciate your
suggestions.

One reserved port for each client strikes me as whacked,
as does coding a server to handle exactly 20 of them. Since
you say this is your first socket server, maybe you just
haven't seen the usual techniques.

Normally, one listener socket accepts all the connections.
Each call to accept() returns a new, independent socket for the
connection. You can then start a thread to handle the new
socket. Untested:
listener = socket.socket(s ocket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STR EAM)
listener.bind(( '', 2000))
listener.listen (5)
while True: # or some should_continue () thing
sock, _ = listener.accept ()
thread.start_ne w_thread(servic e_function, (sock,))
# Or start threads via class Threading
To update the GUI, you could use the Queue from the Python
library, and call wxPostEvent to tell the GUI go wake up and
check the queue.
--
--Bryan

"That twisted example only accepts one client connection" if only one
port is available.
zxo102 写�：

Bryan,
Thanks for your note. Finally, I have made "one listener socket for
all the connections" work plus Queue-communication between the threads
in wxpython Gui and the threads for socket connections.
Trying to make that twisted example code in this topic for "one
listener socket-all the connections" but failed. That twisted example
only accepts one client connection. I have printed out the Twisted help
file (256 pages). Too much to read.

Ouyang
Bryan Olson 写�：

zxo102 wrote:

I am doing a small project using socket server and thread in python.
This is first time for me to use socket and thread things.
Here is my case. I have 20 socket clients. Each client send a set
of sensor data per second to a socket server. The socket server will
do two things: 1. write data into a file via bsddb; 2. forward the data
to a GUI written in wxpython.
I am thinking the code should work as follow (not sure it is
feasible)
20 threads, each thread takes care of a socket server with a
different port.
I want all socket servers start up and wait for client connection.
In the attached demo code, It stops at the startup of first socket
server somewhere in the following two lines and waits for client call:
>
lstn.listen(5)
(clnt,ap) = lstn.accept()

It will block there, waiting for connection.

Any ideas how to handle these 20 clients? Really appreciate your
suggestions.

One reserved port for each client strikes me as whacked,
as does coding a server to handle exactly 20 of them. Since
you say this is your first socket server, maybe you just
haven't seen the usual techniques.

Normally, one listener socket accepts all the connections.
Each call to accept() returns a new, independent socket for the
connection. You can then start a thread to handle the new
socket. Untested:
listener = socket.socket(s ocket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STR EAM)
listener.bind(( '', 2000))
listener.listen (5)
while True: # or some should_continue () thing
sock, _ = listener.accept ()
thread.start_ne w_thread(servic e_function, (sock,))
# Or start threads via class Threading
To update the GUI, you could use the Queue from the Python
library, and call wxPostEvent to tell the GUI go wake up and
check the queue.


--
--Bryan