using re.finditer()

[Erik Johnson]

I am still fairly new to Python and trying to learn to put RE's to good
use. I am a little confused about the finditer() method. It is documented
like so:

finditer( pattern, string)

Return an iterator over all non-overlapping matches for the RE pattern in
string. For each match, the iterator returns a match object. Empty matches
are included in the result unless they touch the beginning of another match.
New in version 2.2.
I would say this documentation is not quite right (or incomplete at
best) because it doesn't document any restriction about multiline matching,
but it certainly seems to have one. This would seem to be an ideal
application for finditer()...

#! /usr/bin/python

import re

html = """
<table>
<tr>
<td>Data 1-1</td>
<td>Data 1-2</td>
<td>Data 1-3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Data 2-1</td>
<td>Data 2-2
</td>
<td>Data 2-3</td>
</tr>
</table>
"""

pat = r'<td.*?>(.*?)</td>'
for match in re.finditer(pat , html):
print match.group(1)
The iterator returned seems to work fine to step through items that
happen to be contained within one line. That is, you can step through flat,
one-line td's, but if you want to step through tr's, this doesn't work (run
this code and notice Data 2-2 is not there). finditer() doesn't accept a
flag like re.DOTALL, as re.match() and re.search() do. It seems a shame not
to be able to put an otherwise smart design to use.

One work around to this is by applying a regualr RE like
'<tr.*?>(.*?)</tr>', finding the first match, and then chopping off the
found part as you go. Another is to change the pattern to something like:
pat = r'<td.*?>([\n\w\s\d-]*?)</td>' I guess I will get one of those
implemented and get this task done, but I am still interested in learning to
use RE's better.
Interestingly, using pat = r'<td.*?>([\r\n.]*?)</td>' does NOT work, and I
don't understand why - can someone explain that?
What exactly would be the equivalent set for dot with re.DOTALL turned on
([\w\W\r\n] works here, but does that really cover it)? Other ideas?

I can think of split & join substituion tricks & the like to replace \n
with something else, then put it back in, but that get's kinda messy and
requires you to find some special substitution character that's not
elsewhere. I want to apply this to dynamically generated text that I don't
control and keep this as general as possible. I'm wondering if I'm not
missing something here - is there no way to make finditer() work
(straightforwar dly) on multilines using just a simple dot RE?

Thanks for taking the time to read my post! :)

-ej

[Peter Otten]

Erik Johnson wrote:

pat = r'<td.*?>(.*?)</td>'
for match in re.finditer(pat , html):
printÂ*match.gr oup(1)
TheÂ*iteratorÂ* returnedÂ*seems Â*toÂ*workÂ*fin eÂ*toÂ*stepÂ*th roughÂ*itemsÂ*t hat
happen to be contained within one line. That is, you can step through
flat, one-line td's, but if you want to step through tr's, this doesn't
work (run this code and notice Data 2-2 is not there). finditer() doesn't
accept a flag like re.DOTALL, as re.match() and re.search() do. It seems a
shame not to be able to put an otherwise smart design to use.

There was a discussion on python-dev recently concerning "missing arguments"
in re.findall() and re.finditer(), see

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pyt...er/048662.html

I think no change was made as there is already an alternative spelling:

r = re.compile(r'<t d.*?>(.*?)</td>', re.DOTALL)
for match in r.finditer(html ):
print match.group(1)

(or two, I didn't know about the option to embed flags in the string until
Robert Brewer's post).

Peter

[Erik Johnson]

Robert Brewer wrote:

Embed the flag(s) you desire in the regex itself. For example, to
include DOTALL, change r'<td.*?>(.*?)</td>' to r'(?s)<td.*?>(. *?)</td>'
Ahhhh! :) Sorry, my bad. Its right there in the docs, but I missed it -
haven't fully comprehended all of re yet. :)
Peter Otten wrote:
r = re.compile(r'<t d.*?>(.*?)</td>', re.DOTALL)
for match in r.finditer(html ):
print match.group(1)

Good - perhaps a more obvious way to do it.

So there's two good work-arounds.
Thank you both for your helpful replies! :)

I am still left puzzled though, why this won't work:

pat = r'<td.*?>([\n.]*?)</td>'
for match in re.finditer(pat , html):
print match.group(1)

but this will:

pat = r'<td.*?>([\w\W]*?)</td>'
for match in re.finditer(pat , html):
print match.group(1)

Thanks,
-ej

[Peter Otten]

Erik Johnson wrote:

I am still left puzzled though, why this won't work:

pat = r'<td.*?>([\n.]*?)</td>'
for match in re.finditer(pat , html):
printÂ*match.gr oup(1)

re.findall(r"[.\n]", "\nx\n") ['\n', '\n'] re.findall(r"[.\n]", "\n.\n")

['\n', '.', '\n']

It seems a dot inside [] means a dot rather than "any character".

Peter

[Erik Johnson]

"Peter Otten" wrote in message news:cl******** *****@news.t-online.com...

re.findall(r"[.\n]", "\nx\n") ['\n', '\n'] re.findall(r"[.\n]", "\n.\n")

['\n', '.', '\n']

It seems a dot inside [] means a dot rather than "any character".

DOH! That's right in the docs too. <blush>

[]
Used to indicate a set of characters. Characters can be listed individually,
or a range of characters can be indicated by giving two characters and
separating them by a "-". Special characters are not active inside sets. For
example, [akm$] will match any of the characters "a", "k", "m", or "$";
[a-z] will match any lowercase letter, and [a-zA-Z0-9] matches any letter or
digit. Character classes such as \w or \S (defined below) are also
acceptable inside a range. If you want to include a "]" or a "-" inside a
set, precede it with a backslash, or place it as the first character. The
pattern []] will match ']', for example.
Like I said, I'm learning. Nothing like experience! :)
Thanks for your help!

-ej