Hi Greg,
Although it doesn't really seem to be a very well-structured database
design, I think there is a solution.
If the amount of fields is low, you can just stick a CASE in the MAX like:
SELECT ...,
MAX(
CASE WHEN value1 > value2 THEN
(CASE WHEN value1 > value3 THEN value1 ELSE value3 END)
ELSE
(CASE WHEN value2 > value3 THEN value2 ELSE value3 END)
END
) as sorter
FROM yourtable
GROUP BY ...
ORDER BY sorter
But if there are more than three values it will be a very long
CASE-statement and you're probably better off defining a FUNCTION. I'm
not sure whether it is possible to define a function with an unspecified
amount of inputvalues, but you can also use the table type as input type
and work with a table record in your function.
It might yield best performance, though, to create a C-function for this.
If there is already a "max of several fields"-function in PostgreSQL,
than you can use that of course.
Best regards,
Arjen
On 7-11-2004 1:31, Net Virtual Mailing Lists wrote:
Hello,
Lets say I have data like this:
value1|value2|v alue3|value4|.. ..|value(N)
------|------|------|------|----|--------
100 | 200 | 300 | 400 | |
10 | 20 | | 40 | |
| 15 | | 16 | |
5 | | | | |
Now I want to sort these based on the maximum value of the data in each
row, so for sorting purposes I would have this:
sort
----
400
40
16
5
Any ideas?... I've tried several things but none of them have given me
the result I am after....
Thanks as always!
- Greg
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to ma*******@postg resql.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org 
