remark on a slowdown of COPY

[vojtech]

Hi,

I would like to remark on a problem described by Stephen Livesey
almost
3 years ago, about the slowdown he had experienced with an upload of
several
millions of rows.

http://www.geocrawler.com/mail/threa...ecords&list=12

The first 100,000 records took 15mins.
The next 100,000 records took 30mins
The last 100,000 records took 4hours.

I'm actually uploading data from a pg_dump file with the COPY command,
it's about 2.5 mil. rows on a 1.6 GHz Linux PC, 512MB, with raiserfs.

I had to dump schema and tables separately ending up in the following
series of steps:

CREATE TABLE keys (
crc integer NOT NULL,
tablenr integer NOT NULL,
tableid integer NOT NULL,
tableref integer NOT NULL,
"key" character varying(250) NOT NULL,
batchid integer NOT NULL
);

ALTER TABLE ONLY keys ADD CONSTRAINT keys_pkey PRIMARY KEY (crc);

COPY keys (crc, tablenr, tableid, tableref, "key", batchid) FROM
stdin;
-265889347 1 2 0
1_1_1982_1_101_ 1011_NULL_NULL_ NULL_102_NULL 1

....

\.

With created index (prim.key) I stopped it half-way through after 2
hours,
getting progressively slower. Strangely, in top the CPU usage and
IO were < 5%, jumping up a bit every now and then, but system load
showed steadily values of over 2 (something internal?, Tom Lane once
mentioned fsync?).

Then without an index (when I removed the ADD CONSTRAINT line), the
upload
time soared to 11 minutes, including index creation afterwards, load
around 1.

The problem with me was that I was dumping schema and tables
separatelly,
thus letting ADD CONSTRAINT be issued in the shown sequence (before
data
were uploaded), otherwise ADD CONSTRAINT goes at the end of the table
dump file, not affecting the perfromance.

--Vojtech