Re: Another AJAX question

[slebetman]

On Jun 5, 9:36 pm, sheldonlg <sheldonlgwrote :

Dan Rumney wrote:

sheldonlg wrote:

I am looking for a clean solution to a problem that I solved in, what
I call, a "dirty" way.

[snip]

Could you provide your dirty code, please?

Sure (in a mixture of code and pseudocode):

*************** *

Javascript processing:
(...the important two lines in handling the response...)
var resp = postProcess(pOb jRequest.respon seText);
document.getEle mentById('foo') .innerHTML = resp;

function postProcess(txt ) {
var hideIt = txt.substring(0 ,1);
var editButton = document.getEle mentById('showE dit');
if (hideIt == 0)
editButton.styl e.display = 'none';
else
editButton.styl e.display = '';
return txt.substring(1 );

}

You can of course use closure to pass the required parameter:

var hideIt; // the variable you wish to pass
ajax.onreadysta techange = function () {
if (ajax.readyStat e == 4) {
if (hideIt) {// here you can use the variable..}
}
}

If you want to pass the value rather than the variable itself:

var hideIt;
(function (myHideIt) {
ajax.onreadysta techange = function () {
if (ajax.readyStat e == 4) {
if (myHideIt) {// check the passed value..}
}
}
})(hideIt) // pass the value of hideIt

Or if you prefer, you can wrap this up in a function that generates a
function:

function makeAjaxCallbac k (ajaxObject,myH ideIt) {
return function () {
if (ajaxObject.rea dyState == 4) {
if (myHideIt) {// check the passed value..}
}
}
}
ajax.onreadysta techange = makeAjaxCallbac k(ajax,hideIt);

There are many ways to use closure to do this depending on exactly
what you want and, to some degree, preferred style.

[sheldonlg]

slebetman wrote:

On Jun 5, 9:36 pm, sheldonlg <sheldonlgwrote :

>Dan Rumney wrote:

>>sheldonlg wrote:
I am looking for a clean solution to a problem that I solved in, what
I call, a "dirty" way.
[snip]
Could you provide your dirty code, please?

Sure (in a mixture of code and pseudocode):

************** **

Javascript processing:
(...the important two lines in handling the response...)
var resp = postProcess(pOb jRequest.respon seText);
document.getEl ementById('foo' ).innerHTML = resp;

function postProcess(txt ) {
var hideIt = txt.substring(0 ,1);
var editButton = document.getEle mentById('showE dit');
if (hideIt == 0)
editButton.styl e.display = 'none';
else
editButton.styl e.display = '';
return txt.substring(1 );

}

You can of course use closure to pass the required parameter:

var hideIt; // the variable you wish to pass
ajax.onreadysta techange = function () {
if (ajax.readyStat e == 4) {
if (hideIt) {// here you can use the variable..}
}
}

If you want to pass the value rather than the variable itself:

var hideIt;
(function (myHideIt) {
ajax.onreadysta techange = function () {
if (ajax.readyStat e == 4) {
if (myHideIt) {// check the passed value..}
}
}
})(hideIt) // pass the value of hideIt

Or if you prefer, you can wrap this up in a function that generates a
function:

function makeAjaxCallbac k (ajaxObject,myH ideIt) {
return function () {
if (ajaxObject.rea dyState == 4) {
if (myHideIt) {// check the passed value..}
}
}
}
ajax.onreadysta techange = makeAjaxCallbac k(ajax,hideIt);

There are many ways to use closure to do this depending on exactly
what you want and, to some degree, preferred style.

I don't understand. How is the hideIt variable set (in the php
script)?. How does the javascript know that there is a variable hideIt
that is coming back? My line:

var resp = postProcess(pOb jRequest.respon seText);

is already inside an

if (ajaxObject.rea dyState == 4) {}

block that returns the string for the innerHTML.

[beegee]

On Jun 6, 7:47*am, sheldonlg <sheldonlgwrote :

slebetman wrote:

I don't understand. *How is the hideIt variable set (in the php
script)?. *How does the javascript know that there is a variable hideIt
that is coming back? *My line:

var resp = postProcess(pOb jRequest.respon seText);

is already inside an

if (ajaxObject.rea dyState == 4) {}

block that returns the string for the innerHTML.

Okay. Asynchronous Javascript XML = AJAX. HTML is not a transport
protocol and generating HTML on the server through PHP responses sort
of contradicts the purpose of AJAX. Rethink your design. Use
Javascript to generate markup from data, use XML or JSON for
transporting that data. If you do this, some of the other poster's
solutions will begin to make sense.

I know there are tons of examples on the net of AJAH but, in my humble
opinion, that's why they're called script kiddies.

Bob

[sheldonlg]

beegee wrote:

On Jun 6, 7:47 am, sheldonlg <sheldonlgwrote :

>slebetman wrote:

>I don't understand. How is the hideIt variable set (in the php
script)?. How does the javascript know that there is a variable hideIt
that is coming back? My line:

var resp = postProcess(pOb jRequest.respon seText);

is already inside an

if (ajaxObject.rea dyState == 4) {}

block that returns the string for the innerHTML.

Okay. Asynchronous Javascript XML = AJAX. HTML is not a transport
protocol and generating HTML on the server through PHP responses sort
of contradicts the purpose of AJAX. Rethink your design. Use
Javascript to generate markup from data, use XML or JSON for
transporting that data. If you do this, some of the other poster's
solutions will begin to make sense.

I know there are tons of examples on the net of AJAH but, in my humble
opinion, that's why they're called script kiddies.

Bob

I **think** I understand what you are saying.

This application happens to be for recipes, and the dropdown list is a
list of recipes. That dropdown list is not created through AJAX. Now,
when the user clicks on a particular recipe, I send an AJAX call. On
the server it looks up the data for the recipe from the database. What
I then do now is to generate the entire html portion of the recipe to
fit into a div on the bottom of the page (via innerHTML).

I guess what you are saying is to send back an xml string containing the
data and use javacript on the browser to process that xml string,
placing all the data into the appropriate tags on the bottom of the page
(since the bottom of the page always has the same fields). In that
case, including another field in the XML would, indeed, be trivial.

Am I reading you correctly?

[beegee]

On Jun 6, 10:21 am, sheldonlg <sheldonlgwrote :

beegee wrote:

On Jun 6, 7:47 am, sheldonlg <sheldonlgwrote :

slebetman wrote:

I don't understand. How is the hideIt variable set (in the php
script)?. How does the javascript know that there is a variable hideIt
that is coming back? My line:

var resp = postProcess(pOb jRequest.respon seText);

is already inside an

if (ajaxObject.rea dyState == 4) {}

block that returns the string for the innerHTML.

Okay. Asynchronous Javascript XML = AJAX. HTML is not a transport
protocol and generating HTML on the server through PHP responses sort
of contradicts the purpose of AJAX. Rethink your design. Use
Javascript to generate markup from data, use XML or JSON for
transporting that data. If you do this, some of the other poster's
solutions will begin to make sense.

I know there are tons of examples on the net of AJAH but, in my humble
opinion, that's why they're called script kiddies.

Bob

I **think** I understand what you are saying.

This application happens to be for recipes, and the dropdown list is a
list of recipes. That dropdown list is not created through AJAX. Now,
when the user clicks on a particular recipe, I send an AJAX call. On
the server it looks up the data for the recipe from the database. What
I then do now is to generate the entire html portion of the recipe to
fit into a div on the bottom of the page (via innerHTML).

I guess what you are saying is to send back an xml string containing the
data and use javacript on the browser to process that xml string,
placing all the data into the appropriate tags on the bottom of the page
(since the bottom of the page always has the same fields). In that
case, including another field in the XML would, indeed, be trivial.

Am I reading you correctly?

Yup. You have it. In this way you're emulating the classic client-
server application and keeping UI and data separate. If you don't
care about security too much, JSON is a even better bet than XML cause
there is no parsing involved on the Javascript side. You just eval
the result and you've got a javascript object.

Bob