functions return by reference question

[lawrence]

If I want a function to return by reference, I do this?

function & myCoolFunction( ) {
$queryObject = new queryObject();
return $queryObject;
}
I get back a reference to the object automatically now?

[Fabian Wleklinski]

Hi Lawrence,

If I want a function to return by reference, I do this?

function & myCoolFunction( ) {
$queryObject = new queryObject();
return $queryObject;
}
I get back a reference to the object automatically now?

Thats alright. But you have to use the &-operator a second
time when calling the function:

$referencedObje ct =& myCoolFunction( );

(Yes. Really. It is ugly, but it is true. See [1].)
Greetings from Frankfurt/Germany,

Fabian Wleklinski
[1] http://www.php.net/manual/en/functio...ing-values.php

[lawrence]

"Fabian Wleklinski" <Wl************ *@eWorks.de> wrote in message

I get back a reference to the object automatically now?

Thats alright. But you have to use the &-operator a second
time when calling the function:

$referencedObje ct =& myCoolFunction( );

(Yes. Really. It is ugly, but it is true. See [1].)

if I go:

$allEntries = & array_reverse($ allEntries);

Then the array is returned by reference? PHP's memory usage is not
doubled in this exchange? At no point are copies made?

I need to do what I can to keep the memory to a minimum.

[Fabian Wleklinski]

Hi lawrence,

if I go:

$allEntries = & array_reverse($ allEntries);

No, I don't think so, becauce array_reverse does not return
a reference, as far as I know.

Greetings from Frankfurt / Germany,

Fabian Wleklinski

[John Downey]

Fabian Wleklinski wrote:

Hi lawrence,

if I go:

$allEntries = & array_reverse($ allEntries);

No, I don't think so, becauce array_reverse does not return
a reference, as far as I know.

Greetings from Frankfurt / Germany,

Fabian Wleklinski

Well PHP wouldn't return a reference what he posted would work what it
would do is tell PHP to assign $allEntries to point to the memory
address of whatever array_reverse() was returning instead of copying the
data like it would normally do. In PHP you can pass arround Objects and
Arrays as refernces but passing them like array_reverse(& $allEntries);
is no longer needed or allowed unless you turn off the option in php.ini.

--
John Downey
http://delusive.dyn.ee
http://sage.dev.box.sk
http://blacksun.box.sk

[Fabian Wleklinski]

Hi John, Hi Lawrence,

Well PHP wouldn't return a reference
Right.
what he posted would work what it would do is tell PHP to assign
$allEntries to point to the memory address of whatever
array_reverse() was returning instead of copying the data like it
would normally do.
May be. That's what would happen in other languages. But I don't
know if PHP really copies the result two times: 1.) from a local
variable inside the method into the result (inside the stack as well),
2.) from the result into the assigned variable. May be PHP goes
another way. I haven't checked the php-source, so I cannot assume
this behaviour.
In PHP you can pass arround Objects and
Arrays as refernces but passing them like array_reverse(& $allEntries);
is no longer needed or allowed unless you turn off the option in php.ini.

Yes, PHP throws a warning if you do so. But Lawarence hasn't :-)

Greetings from Frankfurt / Germany,

Fabian Wleklinski

[John Downey]

Fabian Wleklinski wrote:

May be. That's what would happen in other languages. But I don't
know if PHP really copies the result two times: 1.) from a local
variable inside the method into the result (inside the stack as well),
2.) from the result into the assigned variable. May be PHP goes
another way. I haven't checked the php-source, so I cannot assume
this behaviour.

Well i am going off what I was told when I used to idle in #php on
irc.freenode.ne t

--
John Downey
http://delusive.dyn.ee
http://sage.dev.box.sk
http://blacksun.box.sk