On May 26, 3:53*pm, rich...@cogsci. ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) wrote:
In article <5ec7e828-f05a-4d79-b061-fcd1c73da...@i7 6g2000hsf.googl egroups.com>,
Simon Brooke *<still...@goog lemail.comwrote :
I'm trying to do internationalis ation by using xsl:include to include
a different file depending on the locale setting, and I'm completely
failing.
I've tried several different approaches:
* *<xsl:include href="concat( 'i18n-', $locale, '-include.xslt)"/>
As Bjoern says, you can't do that. *<xsl:includei s a compile-time
inclusion, like #include in C. *XSLT 1.0 doesn't have any dynamic
features of that kind, though EXSLT has a dyn:evaluate function
for (effectively) compiling an XPath at run-time.
Can you parametrise your internationalis ation so that you dynamically
select data rather than code?
[Hi Richard, long time no see]
Thanks to you both.
The problem with i18n is not the languages and cultures with which we
are familiar, but extension to languages and cultures with which we
are not. In particular, with making a framework which has enough
flexibility to extend to languages and cultures with which we are not.
For example, the indefinite article:
<xsl:template name="i18n-indefinite-article">
<!-- a string, presumed to be a noun- e.g. the name of a domain
entity -->
<xsl:param name="noun"/>
<xsl:variable name="initial" select="substri ng( $noun, 1, 1)"/>
<xsl:choose>
<xsl:when test="$initial = 'A' or $initial = 'a'">
<xsl:value-of select="concat( 'an ', $noun)"/>
</xsl:when>
<xsl:when test="$initial = 'E' or $initial = 'e'">
<xsl:value-of select="concat( 'an ', $noun)"/>
</xsl:when>
<xsl:when test="$initial = 'I' or $initial = 'i'">
<xsl:value-of select="concat( 'an ', $noun)"/>
</xsl:when>
<xsl:when test="$initial = 'O' or $initial = 'o'">
<xsl:value-of select="concat( 'an ', $noun)"/>
</xsl:when>
<xsl:when test="$initial = 'U' or $initial = 'u'">
<xsl:value-of select="concat( 'an ', $noun)"/>
</xsl:when>
<xsl:otherwis e>
<xsl:value-of select="concat( 'a ', $noun)"/>
</xsl:otherwise>
</xsl:choose>
</xsl:template>
In English, the indefinite article prefixes the noun to which it
applies; in many Scandinavian languages is postfixes the noun; and in
most Slavonic languages it is missing altogether. English also
demonstrates special cases - the indefinite article used depends on
whether the noun has an initial vowel. Or again, consider plurals:
<xsl:template name="i18n-plural">
<!-- a string, presumed to be a noun -->
<xsl:param name="noun"/>
<xsl:choose>
<xsl:when test="$noun='Pe rson'">People</xsl:when>
<!-- add other special cases here -->
<xsl:when test="starts-with( substring($noun , string-
length($noun) ), 's')">
<xsl:value-of select="concat( $noun, 'es')"/>
</xsl:when>
<xsl:when test="starts-with( substring($noun , string-
length($noun) ), 'y')">
<xsl:value-of select="concat( substring( $noun, string-
length($noun)), 'ies')"/>
</xsl:when>
<xsl:otherwis e>
<xsl:value-of select="concat( $noun, 's')"/>
</xsl:otherwise>
</xsl:choose>
</xsl:template>
In British English - and, I'm sure, in many other languages - this is
a mess of special cases.
If internationalis ation were simply a matter of a lookup table which
returned fixed boilerplate strings, then the document() solution would
work. And if anyone could suggest a (reasonably efficient) way in
which things like indefinite article rules could be encoded as pure
data then that would interest me greatly. But I think that to do the
things I need to do I need the flexibility of having code - so that
people coming after me who write the internationalis ation code for
other locales with which I'm completely unfamiliar have enough
richness to do what they need to do.
The alternate solution I can see is to do a two-phase transformation,
where the first transformation builds an xslt stylesheet with the
correct internationalis ation data in it and the second transformation
builds the end-user document... which I can do, since this is a
transformation which gets run at build time not at run time, so
performance is not critical. I'm sort of glad I hadn't missed
anything, but I'm sorry there isn't a more elegant solution.
