I am making a managed C++ wrapper for calling legacy C++ code from C#.
I don't understand what's wrong with following code :
__gc public class SerialBuffer
{
private:
unsigned char __nogc*_buffer;
short _bufferNr;
bool _isUsed;
int _length;
public:
SerialBuffer (short bufferNr);
....
}
__gc public class TrspPortManaged
{
public:
static const short NbSerialBuffers = 128;
TrspPortManaged ();
....
private:
SerialBuffer *_buffers [];
UMTrspPort __nogc *_unmanaged;
....
}
....
TrspPortManaged ::TrspPortManag ed ()
{
_unmanaged = new UMTrspPort ();
_buffers = new SerialBuffer *[NbSerialBuffers];
SerialBuffer *sb;
for (int i = 1; i <= NbSerialBuffers ; i++)
{
sb = new SerialBuffer (i);
_buffers [i - 1] = sb;
}
....
}
In TrspPortManaged constructor, the first iteration in for loop seems OK
(sb _buffer var = 0x07253240, keep the same value in _buffers [0])
The second iteration (i = 2), sb _buffer var = 0x07256ee8, buffer [1]->
_buffer = 0x00000000
What am I doing wrong ?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Droopy. 8 1639
Please help me
Droopy <dr************ **@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xn******** *************** **********@195. 129.110.71: I am making a managed C++ wrapper for calling legacy C++ code from C#. I don't understand what's wrong with following code :
__gc public class SerialBuffer { private: unsigned char __nogc*_buffer; short _bufferNr; bool _isUsed; int _length;
public:
SerialBuffer (short bufferNr); ... }
__gc public class TrspPortManaged { public: static const short NbSerialBuffers = 128; TrspPortManaged (); ...
private: SerialBuffer *_buffers []; UMTrspPort __nogc *_unmanaged; ... }
...
TrspPortManaged ::TrspPortManag ed () { _unmanaged = new UMTrspPort ();
_buffers = new SerialBuffer *[NbSerialBuffers]; SerialBuffer *sb; for (int i = 1; i <= NbSerialBuffers ; i++) { sb = new SerialBuffer (i); _buffers [i - 1] = sb; } ... }
In TrspPortManaged constructor, the first iteration in for loop seems
OK (sb _buffer var = 0x07253240, keep the same value in _buffers [0]) The second iteration (i = 2), sb _buffer var = 0x07256ee8, buffer [1]-> _buffer = 0x00000000
What am I doing wrong ?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Droopy.
Hi Droopy! I am making a managed C++ wrapper for calling legacy C++ code from C#. I don't understand what's wrong with following code :
What error do you get?
Can you provide a small, complete repro-code?
TrspPortManaged ::TrspPortManag ed () { _unmanaged = new UMTrspPort ();
_buffers = new SerialBuffer *[NbSerialBuffers]; SerialBuffer *sb; for (int i = 1; i <= NbSerialBuffers ; i++) { sb = new SerialBuffer (i); _buffers [i - 1] = sb; } }
I can´t see anything bad...
--
Greetings
Jochen
My blog about Win32 and .NET http://blog.kalmbachnet.de/
"Jochen Kalmbach [MVP]" <no************ ********@holzma .de> wrote in
news:uU******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP12.phx.gbl: Hi Droopy! I am making a managed C++ wrapper for calling legacy C++ code from C#. I don't understand what's wrong with following code :
What error do you get? Can you provide a small, complete repro-code?
I can´t see anything bad...
OK, here it is a sample complete code that illustrate the problem :
1) IprWrapper.h + IprWrapper.cpp in a C++ dll project
// IprWrapper.h
#pragma once
using namespace System;
namespace IprWrapper
{
#pragma once
using namespace System;
using namespace System::Runtime ::InteropServic es;
__gc public class SerialBuffer
{
private:
unsigned char __nogc*_buffer;
short _bufferNr;
bool _isUsed;
int _length;
public:
SerialBuffer (short bufferNr);
__property bool get_IsUsed ()
{
return _isUsed;
}
__property void set_IsUsed (bool value)
{
_isUsed = value;
}
__property short get_BufferNumbe r ()
{
return _bufferNr;
}
__property void set_BufferNumbe r (short value)
{
_bufferNr = value;
}
};
//----- class TrspPortManaged -----------
__gc public class TrspPortManaged
{
public:
static const short BufferSize = 16;
static const short NbSerialBuffers = 128;
TrspPortManaged ();
private:
SerialBuffer *_buffers [];
};
}
// IprWrapper.cpp
#include "stdafx.h"
#include "IprWrapper .h"
namespace IprWrapper
{
TrspPortManaged ::TrspPortManag ed ()
{
_buffers = new SerialBuffer *[NbSerialBuffers];
SerialBuffer *sb;
for (int i = 1; i <= NbSerialBuffers ; i++)
{
sb = new SerialBuffer (i);
_buffers [i - 1] = sb;
}
}
// SerialBuffer class
SerialBuffer::S erialBuffer (short bufferNr)
{
_buffer = new unsigned char [TrspPortManaged ::BufferSize];
IsUsed = false;
_length = 0;
BufferNumber = bufferNr;
}
}
2) A simple C# windows application, using the C++ dll (project reference)
private void Form1_Load(obje ct sender, System.EventArg s e)
{
IprWrapper.Trsp PortManaged transport = new IprWrapper.Trsp PortManaged ();
}
The problem is that, in the TrspPortManaged constructor, in the for loop,
sb->_buffer is changed (from 0x07512d40 to 0x00000000) when the following
line is executed :
_buffers [i - 1] = sb;
Usually, the first iteration works, the second fails.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Droopy.
"Droopy" <dr************ **@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xn******** *************** ***********@195 .129.110.71... "Jochen Kalmbach [MVP]" <no************ ********@holzma .de> wrote in news:uU******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP12.phx.gbl:
Hi Droopy! I am making a managed C++ wrapper for calling legacy C++ code from C#. I don't understand what's wrong with following code :
What error do you get? Can you provide a small, complete repro-code?
I can´t see anything bad...
OK, here it is a sample complete code that illustrate the problem :
1) IprWrapper.h + IprWrapper.cpp in a C++ dll project
// IprWrapper.h
#pragma once
using namespace System;
namespace IprWrapper { #pragma once
using namespace System; using namespace System::Runtime ::InteropServic es; __gc public class SerialBuffer { private: unsigned char __nogc*_buffer; short _bufferNr; bool _isUsed; int _length;
public:
SerialBuffer (short bufferNr);
__property bool get_IsUsed () { return _isUsed; }
__property void set_IsUsed (bool value) { _isUsed = value; }
__property short get_BufferNumbe r () { return _bufferNr; }
__property void set_BufferNumbe r (short value) { _bufferNr = value; } };
//----- class TrspPortManaged -----------
__gc public class TrspPortManaged { public: static const short BufferSize = 16; static const short NbSerialBuffers = 128;
TrspPortManaged ();
private: SerialBuffer *_buffers []; }; }
// IprWrapper.cpp
#include "stdafx.h"
#include "IprWrapper .h"
namespace IprWrapper {
TrspPortManaged ::TrspPortManag ed () { _buffers = new SerialBuffer *[NbSerialBuffers]; SerialBuffer *sb; for (int i = 1; i <= NbSerialBuffers ; i++) { sb = new SerialBuffer (i); _buffers [i - 1] = sb; } }
// SerialBuffer class
SerialBuffer::S erialBuffer (short bufferNr) { _buffer = new unsigned char [TrspPortManaged ::BufferSize]; IsUsed = false; _length = 0; BufferNumber = bufferNr; } }
2) A simple C# windows application, using the C++ dll (project reference)
private void Form1_Load(obje ct sender, System.EventArg s e) { IprWrapper.Trsp PortManaged transport = new IprWrapper.Trsp PortManaged (); }
The problem is that, in the TrspPortManaged constructor, in the for loop, sb->_buffer is changed (from 0x07512d40 to 0x00000000) when the following line is executed : _buffers [i - 1] = sb;
Usually, the first iteration works, the second fails.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Droopy.
Works for me, don't know how you are looking at the sb->_buffer pointer but
all of them are correctly set when I run your code.
Willy.
"Willy Denoyette [MVP]" <wi************ *@telenet.be> wrote in
news:#X******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP09.phx.gbl: "Droopy" <dr************ **@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Xn******** *************** ***********@195 .129.110.71... "Jochen Kalmbach [MVP]" <no************ ********@holzma .de> wrote in news:uU******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP12.phx.gbl:
Hi Droopy! I am making a managed C++ wrapper for calling legacy C++ code from C#. I don't understand what's wrong with following code :
What error do you get? Can you provide a small, complete repro-code?
I can´t see anything bad...
OK, here it is a sample complete code that illustrate the problem :
1) IprWrapper.h + IprWrapper.cpp in a C++ dll project
// IprWrapper.h
#pragma once
using namespace System;
namespace IprWrapper { #pragma once
using namespace System; using namespace System::Runtime ::InteropServic es; __gc public class SerialBuffer { private: unsigned char __nogc*_buffer; short _bufferNr; bool _isUsed; int _length;
public:
SerialBuffer (short bufferNr);
__property bool get_IsUsed () { return _isUsed; }
__property void set_IsUsed (bool value) { _isUsed = value; }
__property short get_BufferNumbe r () { return _bufferNr; }
__property void set_BufferNumbe r (short value) { _bufferNr = value; } };
//----- class TrspPortManaged -----------
__gc public class TrspPortManaged { public: static const short BufferSize = 16; static const short NbSerialBuffers = 128;
TrspPortManaged ();
private: SerialBuffer *_buffers []; }; }
// IprWrapper.cpp
#include "stdafx.h"
#include "IprWrapper .h"
namespace IprWrapper {
TrspPortManaged ::TrspPortManag ed () { _buffers = new SerialBuffer *[NbSerialBuffers]; SerialBuffer *sb; for (int i = 1; i <= NbSerialBuffers ; i++) { sb = new SerialBuffer (i); _buffers [i - 1] = sb; } }
// SerialBuffer class
SerialBuffer::S erialBuffer (short bufferNr) { _buffer = new unsigned char [TrspPortManaged ::BufferSize]; IsUsed = false; _length = 0; BufferNumber = bufferNr; } }
2) A simple C# windows application, using the C++ dll (project reference)
private void Form1_Load(obje ct sender, System.EventArg s e) { IprWrapper.Trsp PortManaged transport = new IprWrapper.Trsp PortManaged (); }
The problem is that, in the TrspPortManaged constructor, in the for loop, sb->_buffer is changed (from 0x07512d40 to 0x00000000) when the following line is executed : _buffers [i - 1] = sb;
Usually, the first iteration works, the second fails.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Droopy.
Works for me, don't know how you are looking at the sb->_buffer pointer but all of them are correctly set when I run your code.
Willy.
I just added _buffers in Watch list.
But you are wright, if I make more iterations in the for loop, the _buffer
value is updated with some "delay".
For example, before I execute iteration 10, _buffer = 0x00000000 for all
_buffer in _buffers array with index > 3 (I mean from _buffers [3] to
_buffers [9]).
After the execution of iteration 10, _buffers [3] is updated with a value !
= 0x00000000 !
May be it is the way the Watch window is working.
So I just added a Dump function called just after the TrspPortManaged
constructor.
At that time, all _buffer pointer are set but from item #27 to item #127,
they all have the same value = 0x00936528 !
Thanks for your help.
Droopy.
"Willy Denoyette [MVP]" <wi************ *@telenet.be> wrote in
news:#X******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP09.phx.gbl: "Droopy" <dr************ **@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Xn******** *************** ***********@195 .129.110.71... "Jochen Kalmbach [MVP]" <no************ ********@holzma .de> wrote in news:uU******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP12.phx.gbl:
Hi Droopy! I am making a managed C++ wrapper for calling legacy C++ code from C#. I don't understand what's wrong with following code :
What error do you get? Can you provide a small, complete repro-code?
I can´t see anything bad...
OK, here it is a sample complete code that illustrate the problem :
1) IprWrapper.h + IprWrapper.cpp in a C++ dll project
// IprWrapper.h
#pragma once
using namespace System;
namespace IprWrapper { #pragma once
using namespace System; using namespace System::Runtime ::InteropServic es; __gc public class SerialBuffer { private: unsigned char __nogc*_buffer; short _bufferNr; bool _isUsed; int _length;
public:
SerialBuffer (short bufferNr);
__property bool get_IsUsed () { return _isUsed; }
__property void set_IsUsed (bool value) { _isUsed = value; }
__property short get_BufferNumbe r () { return _bufferNr; }
__property void set_BufferNumbe r (short value) { _bufferNr = value; } };
//----- class TrspPortManaged -----------
__gc public class TrspPortManaged { public: static const short BufferSize = 16; static const short NbSerialBuffers = 128;
TrspPortManaged ();
private: SerialBuffer *_buffers []; }; }
// IprWrapper.cpp
#include "stdafx.h"
#include "IprWrapper .h"
namespace IprWrapper {
TrspPortManaged ::TrspPortManag ed () { _buffers = new SerialBuffer *[NbSerialBuffers]; SerialBuffer *sb; for (int i = 1; i <= NbSerialBuffers ; i++) { sb = new SerialBuffer (i); _buffers [i - 1] = sb; } }
// SerialBuffer class
SerialBuffer::S erialBuffer (short bufferNr) { _buffer = new unsigned char [TrspPortManaged ::BufferSize]; IsUsed = false; _length = 0; BufferNumber = bufferNr; } }
2) A simple C# windows application, using the C++ dll (project reference)
private void Form1_Load(obje ct sender, System.EventArg s e) { IprWrapper.Trsp PortManaged transport = new IprWrapper.Trsp PortManaged (); }
The problem is that, in the TrspPortManaged constructor, in the for loop, sb->_buffer is changed (from 0x07512d40 to 0x00000000) when the following line is executed : _buffers [i - 1] = sb;
Usually, the first iteration works, the second fails.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Droopy.
Works for me, don't know how you are looking at the sb->_buffer pointer but all of them are correctly set when I run your code.
Willy.
I just added _buffers in Watch list.
But you are wright, if I make more iterations in the for loop, the _buffer
value is updated with some "delay".
For example, before I execute iteration 10, _buffer = 0x00000000 for all
_buffer in _buffers array with index > 3 (I mean from _buffers [3] to
_buffers [9]).
After the execution of iteration 10, _buffers [3] is updated with a value !
= 0x00000000 !
May be it is the way the Watch window is working.
So I just added a Dump function called just after the TrspPortManaged
constructor.
At that time, all _buffer pointer are set but from item #27 to item #127,
they all have the same value = 0x00936528 !
Thanks for your help.
Droopy.
Droopy <dr************ **@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xn******** *************** ***********@195 .129.110.71: "Willy Denoyette [MVP]" <wi************ *@telenet.be> wrote in news:#X******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP09.phx.gbl:
"Droopy" <dr************ **@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Xn******** *************** ***********@195 .129.110.71... "Jochen Kalmbach [MVP]" <no************ ********@holzma .de> wrote in news:uU******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP12.phx.gbl:
Hi Droopy! > I am making a managed C++ wrapper for calling legacy C++ code from > C#. I don't understand what's wrong with following code :
What error do you get? Can you provide a small, complete repro-code?
I can´t see anything bad...
OK, here it is a sample complete code that illustrate the problem :
1) IprWrapper.h + IprWrapper.cpp in a C++ dll project
// IprWrapper.h
#pragma once
using namespace System;
namespace IprWrapper { #pragma once
using namespace System; using namespace System::Runtime ::InteropServic es; __gc public class SerialBuffer { private: unsigned char __nogc*_buffer; short _bufferNr; bool _isUsed; int _length;
public:
SerialBuffer (short bufferNr);
__property bool get_IsUsed () { return _isUsed; }
__property void set_IsUsed (bool value) { _isUsed = value; }
__property short get_BufferNumbe r () { return _bufferNr; }
__property void set_BufferNumbe r (short value) { _bufferNr = value; } };
//----- class TrspPortManaged -----------
__gc public class TrspPortManaged { public: static const short BufferSize = 16; static const short NbSerialBuffers = 128;
TrspPortManaged ();
private: SerialBuffer *_buffers []; }; }
// IprWrapper.cpp
#include "stdafx.h"
#include "IprWrapper .h"
namespace IprWrapper {
TrspPortManaged ::TrspPortManag ed () { _buffers = new SerialBuffer *[NbSerialBuffers]; SerialBuffer *sb; for (int i = 1; i <= NbSerialBuffers ; i++) { sb = new SerialBuffer (i); _buffers [i - 1] = sb; } }
// SerialBuffer class
SerialBuffer::S erialBuffer (short bufferNr) { _buffer = new unsigned char [TrspPortManaged ::BufferSize]; IsUsed = false; _length = 0; BufferNumber = bufferNr; } }
2) A simple C# windows application, using the C++ dll (project reference)
private void Form1_Load(obje ct sender, System.EventArg s e) { IprWrapper.Trsp PortManaged transport = new IprWrapper.Trsp PortManaged (); }
The problem is that, in the TrspPortManaged constructor, in the for loop, sb->_buffer is changed (from 0x07512d40 to 0x00000000) when the following line is executed : _buffers [i - 1] = sb;
Usually, the first iteration works, the second fails.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Droopy.
Works for me, don't know how you are looking at the sb->_buffer pointer but all of them are correctly set when I run your code.
Willy.
I just added _buffers in Watch list. But you are wright, if I make more iterations in the for loop, the _buffer value is updated with some "delay". For example, before I execute iteration 10, _buffer = 0x00000000 for all _buffer in _buffers array with index > 3 (I mean from _buffers [3] to _buffers [9]). After the execution of iteration 10, _buffers [3] is updated with a value ! = 0x00000000 !
May be it is the way the Watch window is working.
So I just added a Dump function called just after the TrspPortManaged constructor. At that time, all _buffer pointer are set but from item #27 to item #127, they all have the same value = 0x00936528 !
Thanks for your help.
Droopy.
I changed some project options and all pointers seem OK now.
I enabled the "Enable Unmanaged Debugging" property from the Windows
application (in Configuration Properties->Debugging).
It reports memory leaks.
There is something I am missing here because I use managed C++.
What should I "delete" or "dispose" ?
Thanks in advance,
Droopy.
Droopy <dr************ **@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:Xn******** *************** ***********@195 .129.110.71: "Willy Denoyette [MVP]" <wi************ *@telenet.be> wrote in news:#X******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP09.phx.gbl:
"Droopy" <dr************ **@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Xn******** *************** ***********@195 .129.110.71... "Jochen Kalmbach [MVP]" <no************ ********@holzma .de> wrote in news:uU******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP12.phx.gbl:
Hi Droopy! > I am making a managed C++ wrapper for calling legacy C++ code from > C#. I don't understand what's wrong with following code :
What error do you get? Can you provide a small, complete repro-code?
I can´t see anything bad...
OK, here it is a sample complete code that illustrate the problem :
1) IprWrapper.h + IprWrapper.cpp in a C++ dll project
// IprWrapper.h
#pragma once
using namespace System;
namespace IprWrapper { #pragma once
using namespace System; using namespace System::Runtime ::InteropServic es; __gc public class SerialBuffer { private: unsigned char __nogc*_buffer; short _bufferNr; bool _isUsed; int _length;
public:
SerialBuffer (short bufferNr);
__property bool get_IsUsed () { return _isUsed; }
__property void set_IsUsed (bool value) { _isUsed = value; }
__property short get_BufferNumbe r () { return _bufferNr; }
__property void set_BufferNumbe r (short value) { _bufferNr = value; } };
//----- class TrspPortManaged -----------
__gc public class TrspPortManaged { public: static const short BufferSize = 16; static const short NbSerialBuffers = 128;
TrspPortManaged ();
private: SerialBuffer *_buffers []; }; }
// IprWrapper.cpp
#include "stdafx.h"
#include "IprWrapper .h"
namespace IprWrapper {
TrspPortManaged ::TrspPortManag ed () { _buffers = new SerialBuffer *[NbSerialBuffers]; SerialBuffer *sb; for (int i = 1; i <= NbSerialBuffers ; i++) { sb = new SerialBuffer (i); _buffers [i - 1] = sb; } }
// SerialBuffer class
SerialBuffer::S erialBuffer (short bufferNr) { _buffer = new unsigned char [TrspPortManaged ::BufferSize]; IsUsed = false; _length = 0; BufferNumber = bufferNr; } }
2) A simple C# windows application, using the C++ dll (project reference)
private void Form1_Load(obje ct sender, System.EventArg s e) { IprWrapper.Trsp PortManaged transport = new IprWrapper.Trsp PortManaged (); }
The problem is that, in the TrspPortManaged constructor, in the for loop, sb->_buffer is changed (from 0x07512d40 to 0x00000000) when the following line is executed : _buffers [i - 1] = sb;
Usually, the first iteration works, the second fails.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Droopy.
Works for me, don't know how you are looking at the sb->_buffer pointer but all of them are correctly set when I run your code.
Willy.
I just added _buffers in Watch list. But you are wright, if I make more iterations in the for loop, the _buffer value is updated with some "delay". For example, before I execute iteration 10, _buffer = 0x00000000 for all _buffer in _buffers array with index > 3 (I mean from _buffers [3] to _buffers [9]). After the execution of iteration 10, _buffers [3] is updated with a value ! = 0x00000000 !
May be it is the way the Watch window is working.
So I just added a Dump function called just after the TrspPortManaged constructor. At that time, all _buffer pointer are set but from item #27 to item #127, they all have the same value = 0x00936528 !
Thanks for your help.
Droopy.
I changed some project options and all pointers seem OK now.
I enabled the "Enable Unmanaged Debugging" property from the Windows
application (in Configuration Properties->Debugging).
It reports memory leaks.
There is something I am missing here because I use managed C++.
What should I "delete" or "dispose" ?
Thanks in advance,
Droopy. This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: Mike Henley |
last post by:
I first came across rebol a while ago; it seemed interesting but then
i was put off by its proprietary nature, although the core of the
language is a free download.
Recently however, i can't help but say i was totally impressed. I
needed an open source wikiblog/wikilog, whatever you wanna call it,
basically a hybrid of a blog and a wiki. I checked out snipsnap, which
uses java, it was said on their site to be a clone of vanilla, a...
|
by: E. Robert Tisdale |
last post by:
What makes a good C/C++ programmer?
Would you be surprised if I told you that
it has almost nothing to do with your knowledge of C or C++?
There isn't much difference in productivity, for example,
between a C/C++ programmers with a few weeks of experience
and a C/C++ programmer with years of experience.
You don't really need to understand the subtle details
or use the obscure features of either language
|
by: typingcat |
last post by:
First of all, I'm an Asian and I need to input Japanese, Korean and so
on. I've tried many PHP IDEs today, but almost non of them supported
Unicode (UTF-8) file.
I've found that the only Unicode support IDEs are DreamWeaver 8 and
Zend PHP Studio.
DreamWeaver provides full support for Unicode. However, DreamWeaver is
a web editor rather than a PHP IDE. It only supports basic IntelliSense
(or code completion) and doesn't have anything...
|
by: Madhur |
last post by:
Hello
what about this nice way to open a file in single line rather than using
if and else.
#include<stdio.h>
void main()
{
FILE *nd;
clrscr();
fopen("c:\\autoexec.bat","r")&&printf("success") || printf("error opeing
|
by: Pyenos |
last post by:
import cPickle, shelve
could someone tell me what things are wrong with my code?
class progress:
PROGRESS_TABLE_ACTIONS=
DEFAULT_PROGRESS_DATA_FILE="progress_data"
PROGRESS_OUTCOMES=
| |
by: Siong.Ong |
last post by:
Dear all,
my PHP aims to update a MySQL database by selecting record
one by one and modify then save.
Here are my PHP, but I found that it doesnt work as it supposed to be,
for example, when Record (i) is shown and modified, the change will
come to Record (i+1).
Can anyone provide suggestion?
thanks.
|
by: Tubular Technician |
last post by:
Hello, World!
Reading this group for some time I came to the conclusion that
people here are split into several fractions regarding size_t,
including, but not limited to,
* size_t is the right thing to use for every var that holds the
number of or size in bytes of things.
* size_t should only be used when dealing with library functions.
|
by: Daniel.C |
last post by:
Hello.
I just copied this code from my book with no modification :
#include <stdio.h>
/* count characters in input; 1st version */
main()
{
long nc;
nc = 0;
|
by: MU |
last post by:
Hello
I have some code that sets a dropdownlist control with a parameter
from the querystring. However, when the querystring is empty, I get
an error.
Here is my code:
Protected Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As
System.EventArgs) Handles Me.Load
If Not Page.IsPostBack Then
|
by: mingke |
last post by:
Hi...
So I have problem with my if condition..I don't know what's wrong but it keeps resulting the wrong answer....
So here's the part of my code I have problem with:
for (i=0; i<size2; i++){
for (k = 0; k < point3; k++){
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
| |
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
| |
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
| |