VK wrote:
SVG is not supported by IE, the latter uses VML instead. I'm not sure
what "xbrowser SVG development" can be with 80%-95% of your visitors
exclided by definition.
Statistics like ( 80%-90% ) should actually include a citation as to
where they came from, as often by chance or by purpose those statistics
come under the category of "self full filling prophecy".
What kind of logs of browser participation would I get if I went to
the Microsoft security update page? What kind of logs would
I get for a Microsoft based site?
I know from my various project logs that while the [default] browser
installed with the operating system typically enjoys a market share
advantage that I get in these projects a different set of percentages,
because I make the effort to start with w3.org standards and reach out.
My Windows machine died a year ago , and I've been using Linux/Gnome
and I have no problems with standards compliant sites, and if you
examine their logs as I have you will find that the 80-90 think
has more to do with the site than the audience.
How many hits do you think you'll get from the people you attempt to
exclude?
>
If for some reason you decided do not use HTML/CSS tools but use the
browser only as a page-size embedded object holder: if that then PDF
format is much more suitable, with plugin installed on nearly any
browser. PDF also supports scripting (it implements a version of
ECMAScript language).