Hash array without using objects

[R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah]

I could see that it is possible to have hash array using objects like
var hash = {"a" : "1", "b" : "2"};

Couldn't still findout how to declare hash array in Array.
var arr = new Array("a" : "1", "b" : "2"); doesn't work. Any hints? TIA

--
<?php echo 'Just another PHP saint'; ?>
Email: rrjanbiah-at-Y!com Blog: http://rajeshanbiah.blogspot.com/

[Michael Winter]

On 9 Dec 2004 11:20:33 -0800, R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah
<ng**********@r ediffmail.com> wrote:

I could see that it is possible to have hash array using objects like
var hash = {"a" : "1", "b" : "2"};
It's not strictly a hash table. What you have above is an object literal
that contains a property/value list. The following snippets are equivalent:

var hash = {a : '1', b : '2'};

var hash = {}; // or new Object();
hash.a = '1';
hash.b = '2';
Couldn't still findout how to declare hash array in Array.
Why would you want to? There's no benefit. But to answer your question,
you'll have to add the properties one by one:

var arr = []; // or new Array();

arr.a = '1';

or

arr['b'] = '2';

[snip]
--

Signature separators are two dashes followed by a space. You seem to have
omitted the space.

[snip]

Mike

--
Michael Winter
Replace ".invalid" with ".uk" to reply by e-mail.

[R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah]

Michael Winter wrote:

On 9 Dec 2004 11:20:33 -0800, R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah
<ng**********@r ediffmail.com> wrote:

I could see that it is possible to have hash array using objects like var hash = {"a" : "1", "b" : "2"};
It's not strictly a hash table. What you have above is an object

literal that contains a property/value list. The following snippets are equivalent:

Thanks for pointing out that. When I quickly searched for hash array
implementation in JS, I came across that. Didn't know that it's object
and properties.
var hash = {a : '1', b : '2'};

var hash = {}; // or new Object();
hash.a = '1';
hash.b = '2';

Couldn't still findout how to declare hash array in Array.
Why would you want to? There's no benefit. But to answer your

question, you'll have to add the properties one by one:
Yes, it doesn't work--both Array and ordinary objects work same in
hash thing. I'd thought in Array, we can use reverse() method and
length property as I need to reverse the hash array--but to my
surprise, it doesn't work--even though Array has reverse() method.

Basically, I want to translate certain characters and implementing
something like PHP's strtr <http://in.php.net/strtr>. In one occasion,
I need to translate characters using map table in forward order, but in
other case need to do in reverse order. I'd thought that hash
implementation would be better in this case as it provides better
readability, etc. In JS, forward thing works fine, but couldn't reverse
such hash array. Any idea? [snip]

--
Signature separators are two dashes followed by a space. You seem to

have omitted the space.

It's not me, but stupid GG Beta; I'm tired of reporting bugs as they
don't care about anything. Sounds like they're saving bits and bytes to
offer GB for their Gmail;)

--
<?php echo 'Just another PHP saint'; ?>
Email: rrjanbiah-at-Y!com Blog: http://rajeshanbiah.blogspot.com/

[Martin Bialasinski]

"R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah" <ng**********@r ediffmail.com> wrote:

I'd thought in Array, we can use reverse() method and length
property as I need to reverse the hash array--but to my surprise, it
doesn't work--even though Array has reverse() method.

Sure reverse() works. It just does not work the way you thing it would.

a = new Array(1,2,3); // a[0] = 1, a[1] = 2, a[2] = 3
a.reverse( ); // now a[0] = 3, a[1] = 2, a[2] = 1

You can't swap indices and values (if this is what you want to do) in
an Array(), because indices can only be interger and values can be of
any type.

[R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah]

Martin Bialasinski wrote:

"R. Rajesh Jeba Anbiah" <ng**********@r ediffmail.com> wrote: <snip> Just as 111111=>aaaaaa. Or 1113=>aaaaaa.

But, if I use the *same* translation map to "untranslat e" "aaaaaa",
it becomes:
aaaaaa=>111111

_unless_ I change the order of map and reverse the string.
But you can't "untranslat e" it, because your translation function

does not do a unambiguous transformation.

You can't know what the value was that became "aaaaaa". If it was 123, 111111 or 1113. Each of then give "aaaaaa" after translation.

Yes, you're right. Reversing the map table wouldn't help for
ambiguous transformation. Thanks for pointing out.

--
<?php echo 'Just another PHP saint'; ?>
Email: rrjanbiah-at-Y!com Blog: http://rajeshanbiah.blogspot.com/

[Laurent Bugnion]

Hi,

Michael Winter wrote:

Why would you want to? There's no benefit. But to answer your question,
you'll have to add the properties one by one:

var arr = []; // or new Array();

arr.a = '1';

or

arr['b'] = '2';

[snip]

Note however that creating an array is not useful in this case, since
you don't use any of the Array features, but only (mis)use the Array as
an Object to store properties in it. There is no added value in using an
Array for this.

HTH,

Laurent
--
Laurent Bugnion, GalaSoft
Software engineering: http://www.galasoft-LB.ch
Private/Malaysia: http://mypage.bluewin.ch/lbugnion
Support children in Calcutta: http://www.calcutta-espoir.ch