Radio Submit Button Problem

[JR]

Hi. I hope someone out there who is more versed with JavaScript than
I can help me with the following annoying problem. Here's the
problem.

I have a form with the following layout:

Column A Column B Column C
data 4 radio buttons more data
.... ... ...
.... ... ...

The form does have a submit button that leads to a given CGI script.
The form also has submit buttons as onClick events inside of the radio
buttons, that point to a different CGI script. The problem is that I
need to know which particular radio button triggered the onClick
event, because when I receive the form data, I only want to process
the row of data for which an event was triggered. As the script is
now, I just receive everything from the form, without knowing which
row to actually process. The one thing I thought about trying was to
call a function with the onClick event that would receive a given row
id (1 through up to 279), and the use document.write to create a
hidden value for just that id. I don't know if this is workable,
though. Am I on the right track with this idea? Is this doable, or
should I think about trying a different approach?

Thanks!!!

[Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn]

Steven Daedelus wrote:

In article <40************ **@PointedEars. de>,
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <Po*********@nu rfuerspam.de> wrote:

Please do not write attribution novels, see e.g.
<http://www.holgermetzg er.de/netscape/usenet.html>
<http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.htm l>

JR wrote:

> The form does have a submit button that leads to a given CGI script.
> The form also has submit buttons as onClick events inside of the radio
> buttons, that point to a different CGI script.

What about users without support for client-side scripting?

You can please all the people some of the time, and some of the people
all the time, but you can't please all the people all the time.

But you can do easily here.
PointedEars

[Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn]

Steven Daedelus wrote:

Do you ever get the feeling that a lot of the most severe compliance ^^^^^^^^^^ fascists don't have clients?

^^^^^^^^
Godwin's Law. You lose.
PointedEars, F'up2 where it belongs

[JR]

ca*********@hot mail.com (Kien) wrote in message news:<16******* *************** ****@posting.go ogle.com>...

</script>

Maybe crude and very redundant but it's 7AM and my brain is not
working ...

HTH

Kien

If it's crude and redundant, but works, I'm all for it! Thanks very
much for the solution. I found that the best solution for my
particular problem was right along the lines of your script. I call a
given function when the user selects a certain radio button, and pass
to this function data for only the row I want to process. I then
append this data string to my script path, i.e.
path/program.cgi?jav ascript_params, and then submit the form. This
way, I do get all of the data from the form when it is submitted, but
I know which row of data to process in the receiving script.

Thanks to everyone for the suggestions.

JR

[Dr John Stockton]

JRS: In article <40************ @PointedEars.de >, seen in
news:comp.lang. javascript, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
<Po*********@nu rfuerspam.de> posted at Wed, 2 Jun 2004 01:54:48 :

Steven Daedelus wrote:

In article <40************ **@PointedEars. de>,
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <Po*********@nu rfuerspam.de> wrote:

Please do not write attribution novels, see e.g.
<http://www.holgermetzg er.de/netscape/usenet.html>
<http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.htm l>

Son-of-RFC1036 (1994) refers to "attributio n lines" containing more
than just a name. Note the implication that more than one physical line
may be
needed.

A draft RFC by C H Lindsey (a well-known News expert), dated August
2002, envisages a line containing name, E-address, newsgroup, Message-
ID, date, and time; and that it may be folded. It is called draft-ietf-
usefor-article-08.txt

Therefore, your customary tedious insistence on minimal attributions is
contrary to respected recent thinking.

--
© John Stockton, Surrey, UK. ?@merlyn.demon. co.uk Turnpike v4.00 MIME ©
Web <URL:http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/tsfaq.html> -> Timo Salmi: Usenet Q&A.
Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demo n.co.uk/news-use.htm> : about usage of News.
No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don't Mail News.

[Jeff Sandler]

JR wrote:

Hi. I hope someone out there who is more versed with JavaScript than
I can help me with the following annoying problem. Here's the
problem.

I have a form with the following layout:

Column A Column B Column C
data 4 radio buttons more data
... ... ...
... ... ...

The form does have a submit button that leads to a given CGI script.
The form also has submit buttons as onClick events inside of the radio
buttons, that point to a different CGI script. The problem is that I
need to know which particular radio button triggered the onClick
event, because when I receive the form data, I only want to process
the row of data for which an event was triggered. As the script is
now, I just receive everything from the form, without knowing which
row to actually process. The one thing I thought about trying was to
call a function with the onClick event that would receive a given row
id (1 through up to 279), and the use document.write to create a
hidden value for just that id. I don't know if this is workable,
though. Am I on the right track with this idea? Is this doable, or
should I think about trying a different approach?

Thanks!!!

Since this conversation seems to have drifted from the point, I'll do my
part to direct it back.

Message author bruce seemed to have the answer to the original question
which allows JR to keep his form as it is. I intend to include code
(not tested, just making it up as I type) to support bruce's idea.
<head>....
<script>
function testButtons(but tonArray)
{
len = buttonArray.len gth
for(i=0;i<len;i ++)
{
if(buttonArray[i].checked)
{
widelyVisibleVa riable = i;
return true;
{
}
}
</script>
......</head>

<body>
....
<form name=someName action=someServ er onSubmit=testBu ttons(buttonGro upName)>
....
</form>
</body>

[Michael Winter]

On 30/03/2005 17:55, Jeff Sandler wrote:

[snip]

Since this conversation seems to have drifted from the point, I'll do my
part to direct it back.

This that conversation is almost a year old, was it really necessary
to resurrect it?

[snip]

Mike

--
Michael Winter
Replace ".invalid" with ".uk" to reply by e-mail.