Clarification on Font Size and Inheritance.

[Viken Karaguesian]

Hello all,

I just need confirmation on the subject of font size and its
inheritance. Take this example:

body {
font-family: arial;
font-size: 95%;
}

p.fineprint {
font-size: 75%;
}

Is the font size in the p.fineprint set to 75% of the *value in the
body*? So in this case, it would be 75% of the 95% in the body. My
experiments seem to show that that's the case, but I just need some
confirmation.

Also, how do EM and % compare? Setting the font to 1em seems to be the
same as setting it to 100%, .90em seems the same as 90%. What are the
technical differences? In which cases should/would I use one over the
other?

Thanks everyone.

Viken K.

[Michael Winter]

On 11/01/2006 13:16, Viken Karaguesian wrote:

[snip]

body {
font-family: arial;
font-size: 95%;
}

p.fineprint {
font-size: 75%;
}

Is the font size in the p.fineprint set to 75% of the *value in the
body*?
Assuming that there are no intervening font-size declarations, yes.

[snip]
Also, how do EM and % compare?
They are directly proportional. A length of 1em equals the computed
value of the font-size property. Furthermore, if the value of a
font-size property is 1em, it equals 100% of the parent font size.

This is explained in the CSS Specification, in 4.3.2 Lengths.

[snip]
What are the technical differences? In which cases should/would I use
one over the other?

I would recommend that you always use percentages, especially if nesting
font-size declarations. IE fails to calculate these properly.

Mike

--
Michael Winter
Prefix subject with [News] before replying by e-mail.

[Andreas Prilop]

On 11 Jan 2006, Viken Karaguesian wrote:

body {
font-size: 95%;

This is naughty! If you specify any font size for BODY, then
take 100% only.

--
Netscape 3.04 does everything I need, and it's utterly reliable.
Why should I switch? Peter T. Daniels in <news:sci.lan g>

[Viken Karaguesian]

Any reason to set the font-size at 100% only? Since the font-size is
inherited, specifying the font-size for a site in the body means I
don't have to repeat it for <p>, <ul>, <li>, <div>, <td>, etc.

If I set the body to 100% but really want my font-size to be 95%, then
I'd have to specify it for all tags, right?

Viken K.

[Viken Karaguesian]

Thanks for the reply Michael.

[Andreas Prilop]

On 11 Jan 2006, Viken Karaguesian wrote:

really want my font-size to be 95%,

Why? Stop wanting that! 100% is the reader's preferred size.
Setting the body font size to anything smaller, means to annoy
the reader.

You could set the font size of footnotes, legalese phrases
and such to something smaller than 100%.

--
Netscape 3.04 does everything I need, and it's utterly reliable.
Why should I switch? Peter T. Daniels in <news:sci.lan g>

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

Viken Karaguesian wrote:

Any reason to set the font-size at 100% only? Since the font-size is
inherited, specifying the font-size for a site in the body means I
don't have to repeat it for <p>, <ul>, <li>, <div>, <td>, etc.
If set in body, no other element needs a font size, except perhaps the
headings (h1, h2, etc) and legalese.

body { font-size: 100%; }
h1 { font-size: 140%; }
h2 { font-size: 125%; }
..legalese { font-size: 85%; }
If I set the body to 100% but really want my font-size to be 95%, then
I'd have to specify it for all tags, right?

No. If you personally like smaller text, set your own browser's default
size a bit smaller. But leave your web pages at *our* default size.

Please see this page as well:
http://www.safalra.com/special/googlegroupsreply/

--
-bts
-Warning: I brake for lawn deer

[Eric Kenneth Bustad]

In article <11************ **********@g43g 2000cwa.googleg roups.com>,
Viken Karaguesian <vi****@aol.com > wrote:

Any reason to set the font-size at 100% only? Since the font-size is
inherited, specifying the font-size for a site in the body means I
don't have to repeat it for <p>, <ul>, <li>, <div>, <td>, etc.

If I set the body to 100% but really want my font-size to be 95%, then
I'd have to specify it for all tags, right?

That is 95% of what the user's browser is configured to use as the
default text size. Presumably that default is what the user prefers.
So why do you want it smaller?

--
= Eric Bustad, Norwegian Bachelor Programmer

[Michael Winter]

On 11/01/2006 14:29, Michael Winter wrote:

[snip]

I would recommend that you always use percentages, especially if nesting
font-size declarations. IE fails to calculate these properly.

^^^^^
By 'these', I was referring to nested font-size declarations that use em
values. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

Mike

--
Michael Winter
Prefix subject with [News] before replying by e-mail.

[Alan J. Flavell]

On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Eric Kenneth Bustad wrote:

Viken Karaguesian <vi****@aol.com > wrote:

If I set the body to 100% but really want my font-size to be 95%, then
I'd have to specify it for all tags, right?

That is 95% of what the user's browser is configured to use as the
default text size. Presumably that default is what the user prefers.
So why do you want it smaller?

It's the modern example of "Optimized for arguing with customers",
don't you know?

As the author of that original article wrote, years ago, when
Windows 95 was state of the art, and 800x600 was a large display:

There is a saying in marketing (at least in Germany): 'No one has
ever won an argument with a customer'. Visitors to your site are your
customers, and if you tell them their configuration is not right, you
are arguing.

But there are web site authors who still don't want to know.