473,698 Members | 2,344 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
+ Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

No future for DB2

This article is very bleak about future of DB2. How credible is the
author. http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1839681,00.asp

Nov 12 '05
375 18042
rkusenet wrote:
This article is very bleak about future of DB2. How credible is the
author. http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1839681,00.asp


Graph the calendar year vs. the average age of DB2 developers and DBAs.
Do the same for the other major commercial RDBMS products. You will have
your answer.

It is not that DB2 is technically incapable of competing. Rather IBM
is presiding over an aging baby-boom workforce. Speaking only from my
experience in the US ... a large number of colleges and universities,
including mine, have active programs teaching SQL Server and Oracle.
I can not think of a single one teaching DB2.

I left Fortran for a reason.
I left COBOL for the same reason.
Those working with DB2 should take a serious look at which is more
important ... product loyalty or paying the mortgage.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
http://www.psoug.org
da******@x.wash ington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Nov 12 '05 #51
"bka" <ba*******@yaho o.com> wrote in message
news:11******** **************@ g14g2000cwa.goo glegroups.com.. .
If only IBM already had a database product hugely respected in the UNIX
market, and in fact designed specifically *for* that market, eh?


4 in the top 9, including #1:

http://www.tpc.org/tpcc/results/tpcc...5&currencyID=0


I was actually thinking of Informix. DB2 was not designed specifically for
UNIX, but for the mainframe. We don't know if Informix would appear at or
near the top of TPC benchmarks because IBM won't enter it for them. We used
to believe that this because it would embarrass DB2, but personally I think
it's more likely to be an extension of the policy of never promoting
Informix, except to the existing user base.
Nov 12 '05 #52
"DA Morgan" <da******@psoug .org> wrote in message
news:1122533361 .487428@yasure. ..
rkusenet wrote:
This article is very bleak about future of DB2. How credible is the
author. http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1839681,00.asp


Graph the calendar year vs. the average age of DB2 developers and DBAs.
Do the same for the other major commercial RDBMS products. You will have
your answer.

It is not that DB2 is technically incapable of competing. Rather IBM
is presiding over an aging baby-boom workforce. Speaking only from my
experience in the US ... a large number of colleges and universities,
including mine, have active programs teaching SQL Server and Oracle.
I can not think of a single one teaching DB2.

I left Fortran for a reason.
I left COBOL for the same reason.
Those working with DB2 should take a serious look at which is more
important ... product loyalty or paying the mortgage.
--
Daniel A. Morgan


Even if your premise is correct (which I believe is greatly exaggerated),
your conclusions are backwards. If there are more DB2 DBA's retiring, then
there will be a shortage of DB2 talent and more job opportunities.

Given the ease of administration improvements in 10g (not to mention the
improvements that are no doubt coming in future Oracle releases), as 8i and
9i installations migrate to 10g, that alone will create at least a 30%
theoretical reduction in the number of Oracle DBA's needed. I expect this
trend to continue as Oracle fends off MS SQL Server.
Nov 12 '05 #53
"Captain Pedantic" <th************ @hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3k******** ****@individual .net...
I was actually thinking of Informix. DB2 was not designed specifically for
UNIX, but for the mainframe. We don't know if Informix would appear at or
near the top of TPC benchmarks because IBM won't enter it for them. We
used
to believe that this because it would embarrass DB2, but personally I
think
it's more likely to be an extension of the policy of never promoting
Informix, except to the existing user base.

DB2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows was not designed for the mainframe. It is a
different code base than DB2 for z/OS. It was designed for OS/2 and AIX in
its first incarnations.

IBM purchased Informix for the patents (which had significant license fees)
and the market share. The buyout grew out of discussions with Informix about
license fees for the patents and IBM realized that Informix was asking for a
significant amount relative to the value of the whole company (Informix
stock had seriously depressed in value trying to compete against the big
3)..

TPC benchmarks are not exactly cheap since you really need a group of people
working full time on it, and lot of expensive hardware. This can easily add
up to a few million per year. IBM would rather that customers switch to DB2.
Nov 12 '05 #54
Mark A wrote:
"Noons" <wi*******@yaho o.com.au> wrote in message
Oh puh-leaze: the ONLY reason IBM bought Informix
was that it was a cheap way of buying another 5 or so %
points in the db size of user base race so they could
claim to be ahead of Oracle!

They NEVER had any plan to do anything else with Informix
other than improperly claiming their share of the market
as DB2's or IBm's.

And that's a fact.


Kind of like Oracle buying Peoplesoft.


Not the case at all. I'll bet hard dollars that when Oracle
get done fusing Oracle Apps with PeopleSoft ... some of what
will disappear is existing Oracle Apps replaced by superior
PeopleSoft design.

Informix will be lucky if it gets the respect Oracle has
given to RDB. More likely it will be to IBM what Fox is
to Microsoft. And that is a shame.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
http://www.psoug.org
da******@x.wash ington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Nov 12 '05 #55
Captain Pedantic wrote:
"bka" <ba*******@yaho o.com> wrote in message
news:11******** **************@ g14g2000cwa.goo glegroups.com.. .
If only IBM already had a database product hugely respected in the UNIX
market, and in fact designed specifically *for* that market, eh?


4 in the top 9, including #1:

http://www.tpc.org/tpcc/results/tpcc...5&currencyID=0

I was actually thinking of Informix. DB2 was not designed specifically for
UNIX, but for the mainframe. We don't know if Informix would appear at or
near the top of TPC benchmarks because IBM won't enter it for them. We used
to believe that this because it would embarrass DB2, but personally I think
it's more likely to be an extension of the policy of never promoting
Informix, except to the existing user base.


I think it is both.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
http://www.psoug.org
da******@x.wash ington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Nov 12 '05 #56
Mark A wrote:
"DA Morgan" <da******@psoug .org> wrote in message
news:1122533361 .487428@yasure. ..
rkusenet wrote:
This article is very bleak about future of DB2. How credible is the
author. http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1839681,00.asp


Graph the calendar year vs. the average age of DB2 developers and DBAs.
Do the same for the other major commercial RDBMS products. You will have
your answer.

It is not that DB2 is technically incapable of competing. Rather IBM
is presiding over an aging baby-boom workforce. Speaking only from my
experience in the US ... a large number of colleges and universities,
including mine, have active programs teaching SQL Server and Oracle.
I can not think of a single one teaching DB2.

I left Fortran for a reason.
I left COBOL for the same reason.
Those working with DB2 should take a serious look at which is more
important ... product loyalty or paying the mortgage.
--
Daniel A. Morgan

Even if your premise is correct (which I believe is greatly exaggerated),
your conclusions are backwards. If there are more DB2 DBA's retiring, then
there will be a shortage of DB2 talent and more job opportunities.

Given the ease of administration improvements in 10g (not to mention the
improvements that are no doubt coming in future Oracle releases), as 8i and
9i installations migrate to 10g, that alone will create at least a 30%
theoretical reduction in the number of Oracle DBA's needed. I expect this
trend to continue as Oracle fends off MS SQL Server.


Even if your statements are correct I don't believe it is going to
happen that way.

Lets say I have DB2 in my facility ... I was at a major IBM shop in
Portland Oregon three weeks ago that is precisely that.

And lets say the CTO isn't a software bigot but rather has his
corporation's best interests at heart. The CTO has a choice ... hire
young inexperienced talent and train them up to the level of those of
us in our 50s and 60s on mainframes which means also teaching COBOL,
CICS, MVS JCL, OS/390, z/OS, TSO, VSAM, IMS, REXX, ISPF, and CLISTS
or get already trained talent straight out of a college program.

Lets say the CFO of the firm has a choice of maintaining big iron
with attendant costs in infrastructure including power conditioning,
air conditioning, etc. or can build a mainframe from 2 proc or 4 proc
commodity hardware for a fraction of the cost and get the same
computing power at a fraction of the cost. Look at the number of
super computers now build from commodity hardware for example.

And lets say the Board of Directors is paying attention to the fact
that reducing costs increases the value per share of the stock which
is their fiduciary responsibility to the stockholders the direction
is clear.

The number of DBAs required in the future is going down like the
value of Sun Microsystems stock.

So yes there will be holes in the organization created. But I've yet
to meet the CTO whose solution was to incur the cost of training on
mainframe technologies. Heck most won't even pay money to train their
existing staff and they too need it.

It is all about dollars.
The C-Level management is looking out for the bottom line.
We need to be look out for our mortgage payments.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
http://www.psoug.org
da******@x.wash ington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Nov 12 '05 #57
Noons wrote:
Anton Versteeg wrote:
The author forgets a couple of things:
DB2 is the only RDBMS that runs on mainframe, midrange and PC servers.

False as can be...

(Oracle is non-existent on the mainframe)

Nevertheless, it RUNS on mainframes. Which makes your
claim above totally false.


No since Oracle has zip marketshare on the mainframe,
my statement is true, but to please you I will rephrase it to:
DB2 is the only product that has proven it runs on the mainframe,
midrange and PC and also sunstantial market share.
There is more data stored in DB2 than in any other DBMS product.

Size matters now? :)


yooo man :)
Face it: outside of the mainframe environment, DB2
has got NO CHANCE of long term survival.

Wannna bet? Kind of stealing from a child :)

--
Anton Versteeg
IBM Netherlands
Nov 12 '05 #58
DA Morgan wrote:

Those working with DB2 should take a serious look at which is more
important ... product loyalty or paying the mortgage.


You still have a mortgage?
Mine was paid off long time ago :)
--
Anton Versteeg
IBM Netherlands
Nov 12 '05 #59
DA Morgan apparently said,on my timestamp of 28/07/2005 5:26 PM:
Not the case at all. I'll bet hard dollars that when Oracle
get done fusing Oracle Apps with PeopleSoft ... some of what
will disappear is existing Oracle Apps replaced by superior
PeopleSoft design.
"fusing"? You know something you don't wanna tell us, Daniel?
<g,d&r>
Informix will be lucky if it gets the respect Oracle has
given to RDB. More likely it will be to IBM what Fox is
to Microsoft. And that is a shame.


Indeed.

--
Cheers
Nuno Souto
in sunny Sydney, Australia
wi*******@yahoo .com.au.nospam
Nov 12 '05 #60

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

47
3650
by: David Eng | last post by:
> For many years now enterprise business application development has > been the core area for the use of C++. > Today a significant share to this segment has already been lost to > SUN's Java technology and with MS now abandoning C++ in favour if its > proprietery .NET and C# technology, how long can we except C++ to hold > on against these might competitors? > Has C++ become a dying language? > What is the future of C++? As I posted...
35
3331
by: GTO | last post by:
I do not believe that C# is the future of C++. I also do not believe that adding two thousand new library functions to the standard library is the future of C++. But what is the future of C++? Is it as good as a programming language can get? Like so many of you, I programmed speech recognizers, image recognition systems, a portion of a chess program, lots of numeric code using STL, and tons of other applications in C++, (even firmware...
9
2365
by: Lyle Fairfield | last post by:
It's confusing. Many people here and elsewhere make many different predictions: There's an introduction mentioning some aspects of this at http://msdn.microsoft.com/data/mdac/techinfo/default.aspx? pull=/library/en-us/dnmdac/html/data_mdacroadmap.asp revised Sep 2005 (upper case conversions are mine)
2
2160
by: | last post by:
Everything seems to be moving to .NET and VC++ seems to be adding a lot of managed code support every new release. The questions: is unmanaged code in VC++ beeing phased out in favour of managed code? And suppose I still program in VC++ 6.0, can I safely assume that the code I use in VC++ 6.0 will still be available in future VC++ versions. Finally will VC++ 6.0 generated executables be still be able to run on futur Windows versions and...
0
1849
by: Fuzzyman | last post by:
Hello all, The following is a copy of a blog entry. It's asking a question about future statements and the built in compile function. I'd appreciate any pointers or comments about possible approaches. `Movable Python <http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/movpy/>`_ supports running both Python scripts and ``.pyc`` bytecode files. It does this by compiling scripts to bytecode, or extracting the code object from bytecode files, and then...
29
3114
by: Zootal | last post by:
My apologies if this gets asked/discussed a lot. With c# rampaging through corporate USA (and other countries), what impact will this have on the usage and future of c++? I've used both of them a bit. I'm in school, and our CS program does not use c#, but uses mostly c++ and a bit of java. C# is relegated ot the CIS programs. Out there in the real world, what kind of a future does c++ have?
6
14446
by: rohayre | last post by:
Im a long time java developer and actually have never done anything with java scripting. I'd like to write a short simple script for calculating a date in the future based on today's date and a letter. Can I use javascripting to create a webpage to allow a user to enter a letter and then click a button to find a future calendar date? I'm just not sure how much user interaction scripting allows. Does java scripting allow buttons, textfields...
190
8084
by: blangela | last post by:
If you had asked me 5 years ago about the future of C++, I would have told you that its future was assured for many years to come. Recently, I have been starting to wonder. I have been teaching C++ at a local polytechnical school here in Vancouver, Canada for approximately 8 years. Six years ago, at the height (or should I say volume?) of the internet bubble, I had 80+ students per semester in my C++ course. Now I am fortunate to have...
5
3590
by: KimmoA | last post by:
Does C have a future? I'd like to think so, but nobody seems to agree with me. Of course, I don't use C in my profession, and maybe I wouldn't be using it if I had the pressure to actually produce things with deadlines and stuff. Hmm. That's a depressing thought. I can't stand OOP. Yes, it is beautiful in theory, and it might make sense for huge projects with many people involved, but I don't want anything to do with it. (I switched to C...
51
3413
by: Jon Harrop | last post by:
If Microsoft turn F# into a product and place it alongside C# and VB, will many people migrate from C# to F#? -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?u
0
8680
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look ! Part I. Meaning of...
0
8609
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it. First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
0
8871
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
0
7738
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own.... Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
1
6528
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM). In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules. He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms. Adolph will...
0
5861
by: conductexam | last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one. At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image. Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
0
4622
by: adsilva | last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
2
2335
muto222
by: muto222 | last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
3
2007
bsmnconsultancy
by: bsmnconsultancy | last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.