array of references

[maadhuu]

hello.
why can't you have an array of references ??? can someone enlighten me on
this ??
thanx.

[Victor Bazarov]

maadhuu wrote:

why can't you have an array of references ??? can someone enlighten me on
this ??

You can only create an array of objects. References are not objects.

V

[Alf P. Steinbach]

* maadhuu:

why can't you have an array of references ??? can someone enlighten me on
this ??

It's simpler that way.

A reference cannot be assigned, and has no size.

If arrays of references were allowed they would therefore have to be treated
specially in every way.

--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?

[Phlip]

maadhuu wrote:

why can't you have an array of references ???

Because references are not "things". They are not objects; you can't point
to them, take their addresses, etc.

Naturally, many situations implement them as invisible pointers. However, if
the C++ Standard allowed any syntax more that forced them to become
"invisible pointers", such law would limit the kinds of optimizations
compilers can subject them to. You can't point to a reference, and index
addressing is explicitely defined as a form of pointing-to.

The next question should be this: What benefit can you expect to derive from
an array of references. If you need to replace -> with ., then look to your
own interface, not to the Standard. Here's pseudo-C++ showing such an
interface:

class Things
{
private:
std::vector<Thi ng *> things;
public:
Thing & operator[] (int idx)
{
Thing * pThing = things[idx];
assert(pThing);
return *pThing;
}
};

--
Phlip
http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?ZeekLand

[Howard Hinnant]

In article
<b8************ *************** ***@localhost.t alkaboutprogram ming.com>,
"maadhuu" <ma************ @yahoo.com> wrote:

hello.
why can't you have an array of references ??? can someone enlighten me on
this ??
thanx.

You might look at std::tr1::tuple if your std::library supplies it, or
at boost::tuple if your std::lib doesn't. It may supply you with the
functionality you're looking for.

#include <tuple>
#include <iostream>

int main()
{
int i, j, k;
std::tr1::tuple <int&, int&, int&> int_refs = std::tr1::tie(i , j, k);
std::tr1::get<0 >(int_refs) = 1;
std::tr1::get<1 >(int_refs) = 2;
std::tr1::get<2 >(int_refs) = 3;
std::cout << i << '\n';
std::cout << j << '\n';
std::cout << k << '\n';
}

1
2
3

-Howard