First of all: I love C and think that it's beautiful. However, there is
at least one MAJOR flaw: the lack of a boolean type.
OK. Some of you might refer to C99 and its _Bool (what's up with the
uppercase 'B' anyway?) and the header you can include (apparently) to
get a real "bool". This isn't my point, however -- it should have been
there from the beginning.
Char is a small int. We all know that. However, "char some_bool = 0;"
simply feels wrong, and I think that most of you agree. Plus, it's
still too large.
"int some_bool = 0;" is what I -- and everyone else, I assume -- use
for bools. But an int is a very large data type for something that will
only ever be true or false (1 or 0). This really, really bugs me.
Why, back when C was designed, didn't they see a reason to build in a
boolean type into the language? Now it matters less, I guess, but back
then, there should have been very strong technical reasons. It just
doesn't make any sense whatsoever to me.
I have asked many people about this for quite some time, and they are
all just telling me that I'm silly for bringing it up. Why? It's not
that I NEED a bool to get anything done -- it's the principle. Saving
resources and coding a little more prettily is a Good Thing (TM) IMO.
So... can somebody properly explain this to me once and for all? I'm
sure there MUST be a logical explanation that nobody seems to really
understand. The madness must end.
bool some_bool = 0; /* How great it would be... */
Nov 3 '07
51  2937 
On Nov 26, 12:53 am, Bart <b...@freeuk.co mwrote:
An array of Bool could save considerable resources, typically 87.5%,
if implemented as a bit-array. There would be implementation issues in
C however as a bit wouldn't be directly addressable.
Bart
Sorry I didn't realise this thread is 3 weeks old.
Bloody Google showing this near the top because of a late post. (Will
be even nearer the top now.)
In article
<8a************ *************** *******@e4g2000 hsg.googlegroup s.com>, Bart
<bc@freeuk.comw rites
>On Nov 4, 2:05 am, "J. J. Farrell" <j...@bcs.org.u kwrote:
>On Nov 3, 10:56 pm, AommiK <nos...@nospam. comwrote:
First of all: I love C and think that it's beautiful. However, there is
at least one MAJOR flaw: the lack of a boolean type.
It's not
that I NEED a bool to get anything done -- it's the principle. Saving
resources and coding a little more prettily is a Good Thing (TM) IMO.
How would it save resources? A boolean type smaller than char would
require more resources to implement and at run time. How would it make
coding any prettier?
An array of Bool could save considerable resources, typically 87.5%,
if implemented as a bit-array. There would be implementation issues in
C however as a bit wouldn't be directly addressable.
Some MCU have directly addressable bit types and you can save a lot of
resources.
However in most MCU that will not work with anything less than a byte
you are going to have to do a code work around.... SO you have to
balance the speed of using a byte per bool or the memory saving of a
bit per bit and have it slower and a bit more code.
--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
/\/\/ ch***@phaedsys. org www.phaedsys.org \/\/\
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics | |
by: Pierre Espenan |
last post by:
A have a long integer class. The built integer type within a conditional
statement returns bool false for int i=0 and bool true for any other non
zero value. I want my long integer class to have similar behavior. My
class looks like this:
#ifndef long_int_H
#define long_int_H
#include <string>
using namespace std;
typedef valarray<complex<double> > VCD;
|
by: daniel |
last post by:
1)
is C++ smart enough to automatically use "bits" for bool or will
a bool have the size of a charcter (byte).
2) The index of a vector is it an integer (4 byte) or a "long long"
with 8 bytes or something else?
I ask because I want to use
vector<bool> with a few billion entries exceeding the int32 range for
indexing and I want to use as few memory as possible for the whole
|
by: ORC |
last post by:
Is the bool type actually an Int32 with 0 as false and non zero as true? The
reason for my question is that I've seen a lot of API calls that return a
Int32 implemented in C# as an bool like:
private static extern bool PurgeComm( Int32 hFile, UInt32 dwFlags);
Thanks
Ole
|
by: zl2k |
last post by:
hi, there
I am using a big, sparse binary array (size of 256^3). The size may be
changed in run time. I first thought about using the bitset but found
its size is unchangeable. If I use the vector<bool>, does each element
takes 4 bytes instead of 1 bit? I am using gcc3.4.4. There is a
bit_vector which is kind of old so I wont use that. Any other choices?
Thanks ahead.
zl2k
|
by: shaanxxx |
last post by:
I have code which says
#define MYBOOL int
This code is very old. people who have written is not avaible. I was
thinking what could be reason.
1) bool datatype was not available that time (10 years back: correct me
if i am wrong)
2) int was word aligned (16bit and 32bit). Writter of above code doesnt
want to give choice to compiler.
| | |
by: markb |
last post by:
Hi
My C# app is being called from a callback from an unmanaged DLL. One of
the parameters of the callback is of type BOOL. I am using PInvoke to
marshal this to a (managed) bool. The problem is that no matter if we
pass TRUE or FALSE, the bool is always marshalled as true.
// unmanaged code in dll
typedef bool (__stdcall *BoolCallBack)(short b);
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
| | |
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
| |
