Convert char* to upper case

[RishiD]

Hi,

For some reason I am blanking this Friday morning. I have a class
constructor call Point as shown below. Trying to figure out how I can
make the arguments passed in all upper case before I set the member
variables.

Thanks for the insight.

RishiD

Point(const char* name,
const char* description,
const char* iomid,
const char* address,
const char* type,
Event* event)
{
m_strName = name;
m_strDesc = description;
m_strAddress = address;
m_strType = type;
m_strParentName = iomid;
m_Event = event;
}

[Christopher Benson-Manica]

RishiD <ri****@gmail.c omwrote:

For some reason I am blanking this Friday morning.

Starting with posting code that seems a little like C++ to
comp.lang.c? (It has indeed been a lengthy week.)

I have a class
constructor call Point as shown below. Trying to figure out how I can
make the arguments passed in all upper case before I set the member
variables.

There's no builtin C function to do this, but you could write one
using the builtin toupper() for characters. Alternatively, there
might be a C++ way to do this, if you are indeed writing C++ as it
seems.

--
C. Benson Manica | I *should* know what I'm talking about - if I
cbmanica(at)gma il.com | don't, I need to know. Flames welcome.

[Richard Heathfield]

RishiD said:

Hi,

For some reason I am blanking this Friday morning. I have a class
constructor call Point as shown below.

....which makes me think you're using C++, so I've cross-posted this
reply to comp.lang.c++, and set followups to that group.

Trying to figure out how I can
make the arguments passed in all upper case before I set the member
variables.

In C, you'd probably write a function that calls toupper() in a loop -
but in C++ there may be a more C++y way to do it.

[Remainder of your article retained, for clc++'s convenience. Hi guys,
long time no see.]

>
Thanks for the insight.

RishiD

Point(const char* name,
const char* description,
const char* iomid,
const char* address,
const char* type,
Event* event)
{
m_strName = name;
m_strDesc = description;
m_strAddress = address;
m_strType = type;
m_strParentName = iomid;
m_Event = event;
}

--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at the above domain, - www.

[Roberto Waltman]

Christopher Benson-Manica wrote:

>RishiD <ri****@gmail.c omwrote:

>>... Trying to figure out how I can
make the arguments passed in all upper case before I set the member
variables.

There's no builtin C function to do this, but you could write one
using the builtin toupper() for characters. Alternatively, there
might be a C++ way to do this, if you are indeed writing C++ as it
seems.

[OT] That would be, surprisingly, the toupper(c) or toupper(begin,e nd)
services provided in <ctype>

Roberto Waltman

[ Please reply to the group,
return address is invalid ]

[Christopher Layne]

RishiD wrote:

Hi,

For some reason I am blanking this Friday morning. I have a class
constructor call Point as shown below. Trying to figure out how I can
make the arguments passed in all upper case before I set the member
variables.

Point(const char* name,
const char* description,
const char* iomid,
const char* address,
const char* type,
Event* event)
{
m_strName = name;
m_strDesc = description;
m_strAddress = address;
m_strType = type;
m_strParentName = iomid;
m_Event = event;
}

#include <ctype.h>

void up(char *q)
{
unsigned char c;

while (*q) { c = *q; *q = toupper(c); q++; }

return;
}

Also your function specifies "const char *". You might want to adhere to that.

[Christopher Layne]

Roberto Waltman wrote:

[OT] That would be, surprisingly, the toupper(c) or toupper(begin,e nd)

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

???

[Eric Sosman]

Christopher Layne wrote On 02/16/07 11:07,:

Roberto Waltman wrote:

>>[OT] That would be, surprisingly, the toupper(c) or toupper(begin,e nd)

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

???

Go back and read Roberto's message again, this time
paying attention to the text he quoted and responded to.

--
Er*********@sun .com

[=?utf-8?B?SGFyYWxkIHZhbiBExLNr?=]

Eric Sosman wrote:

Christopher Layne wrote On 02/16/07 11:07,:

Roberto Waltman wrote:

>[OT] That would be, surprisingly, the toupper(c) or toupper(begin,e nd)

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

???

Go back and read Roberto's message again, this time
paying attention to the text he quoted and responded to.

The C++ part? toupper(begin,e nd) is new to me if it's valid at all,
regardless of which language is used.

[=?utf-8?B?SGFyYWxkIHZhbiBExLNr?=]

Eric Sosman wrote:

Christopher Layne wrote On 02/16/07 11:07,:

Roberto Waltman wrote:

>[OT] That would be, surprisingly, the toupper(c) or toupper(begin,e nd)

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

???

Go back and read Roberto's message again, this time
paying attention to the text he quoted and responded to.

The C++ part? toupper(begin,e nd) is new to me if it's valid at all,
regardless of which language is used.

[=?utf-8?B?SGFyYWxkIHZhbiBExLNr?=]

Roberto Waltman wrote:

Christopher Layne wrote:

Roberto Waltman wrote:

[OT] That would be, surprisingly, the toupper(c) or toupper(begin,e nd)

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^

[un-snip]

services provided in <ctype>

Off-topic, wearing a C++ hat:
From Josuttis "The C++ Standard Library", 1st ed, 10th printing, page
716.

The facet ctype is a template class parameterized with a character
type...
...
Table 14.16. Services defined by the ctype<charTFace t
...
ct.toupper(beg, end) Converts each letter in the range between beg and
end by replacing the letter with the result of toupper()

Oh, provided by a ctype class, not provided by any <ctypeheader... ?