local macro 'Symbol' (Location) not referenced

[Linny]

Hi,
I have picked this piece of code(slightly modified) from one of gimpel
software's lint page "bug of the month"

#include <stdio.h>
#define ON_THE_ROCKS

const char *ice()
{
#if defined(SHAKEN_ NOT_STIRRED)
return "shaken not stirred";
#elif defined(STIRRED _NOT_SHAKEN)
return "stirred not shaken";
#elif defined(ON_THE_ ROCKS)
return "on the rocks";
#else
return "";
#endif
}

int main()
{
int i;
printf( "Celebrate the New Year " );
printf( "with your drink %s.\n", ice() );
return 0;
}

The output after compiling with gcc(Dev C++) and execution was
"Celebrate the New Year with your drink ." and not "Celebrate the New
Year with your drink on the rocks" as I expected.
The Reference Manual Explanation given was
750 local macro 'Symbol' (Location) not referenced -- A 'local'
macro is one that is not defined in a header file. The macro
was
not referenced throughout the module in which it is defined.

I am unable to follow the explanation as I tried including the macro in
a header file but got the same result. Am I missing something ? Can
anyone please explain in detail.

[Jens Thoms Toerring]

Linny <li*******@gmai l.comwrote:

I have picked this piece of code(slightly modified) from one of gimpel
software's lint page "bug of the month"

#include <stdio.h>
#define ON_THE_ROCKS

const char *ice()
{
#if defined(SHAKEN_ NOT_STIRRED)
return "shaken not stirred";
#elif defined(STIRRED _NOT_SHAKEN)
return "stirred not shaken";
#elif defined(ON_THE_ ROCKS)
return "on the rocks";
#else
return "";
#endif
}

int main()
{
int i;
printf( "Celebrate the New Year " );
printf( "with your drink %s.\n", ice() );
return 0;
}

The output after compiling with gcc(Dev C++) and execution was
"Celebrate the New Year with your drink ." and not "Celebrate the New
Year with your drink on the rocks" as I expected.

The Reference Manual Explanation given was
750 local macro 'Symbol' (Location) not referenced -- A 'local'
macro is one that is not defined in a header file. The macro
was
not referenced throughout the module in which it is defined.

I am unable to follow the explanation as I tried including the macro in
a header file but got the same result. Am I missing something ? Can
anyone please explain in detail.

All you're missing is that in the program from the website

http://www.gimpel.com/html/bugs/bug750.htm

in 'ON_THE_ROCKS' the 'O' in 'ROCKS' is a character 'O' when the
macro is defined, but in the test there's the number '0' instead,
so also this test fails and the function returns the empty string.
You seem to have not used copy-and-pasted the program and removed
the bug when you typed it in.
Regards, Jens
--
\ Jens Thoms Toerring ___ [e-mail]
\______________ ____________ http://toerring.de

[Linny]

Jens Thoms Toerring wrote:

Linny <li*******@gmai l.comwrote:

I have picked this piece of code(slightly modified) from one of gimpel
software's lint page "bug of the month"

#include <stdio.h>
#define ON_THE_ROCKS

const char *ice()
{
#if defined(SHAKEN_ NOT_STIRRED)
return "shaken not stirred";
#elif defined(STIRRED _NOT_SHAKEN)
return "stirred not shaken";
#elif defined(ON_THE_ ROCKS)
return "on the rocks";
#else
return "";
#endif
}

int main()
{
int i;
printf( "Celebrate the New Year " );
printf( "with your drink %s.\n", ice() );
return 0;
}

The output after compiling with gcc(Dev C++) and execution was
"Celebrate the New Year with your drink ." and not "Celebrate the New
Year with your drink on the rocks" as I expected.

The Reference Manual Explanation given was
750 local macro 'Symbol' (Location) not referenced -- A 'local'
macro is one that is not defined in a header file. The macro
was
not referenced throughout the module in which it is defined.

I am unable to follow the explanation as I tried including the macro in
a header file but got the same result. Am I missing something ? Can
anyone please explain in detail.

All you're missing is that in the program from the website

http://www.gimpel.com/html/bugs/bug750.htm

in 'ON_THE_ROCKS' the 'O' in 'ROCKS' is a character 'O' when the
macro is defined, but in the test there's the number '0' instead,
so also this test fails and the function returns the empty string.
You seem to have not used copy-and-pasted the program and removed
the bug when you typed it in.
Regards, Jens
--
\ Jens Thoms Toerring ___ [e-mail]
\______________ ____________ http://toerring.de

Thanks a Lot Jens... you are right
I missed it completely..... What a waste of time !!