Why doesn't this program work as expected?

[Alex Buell]

#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>

using namespace std;

template <typename T>
class LessThan
{
private:
T comp;
public:
LessThan(T val) : comp(val) {}
void setComp(const T& val) { comp = val; }
T getComp(void) { return comp; } const
bool operator()(cons t T& value) { return value < comp; }
};

int main()
{
double darr[10] = { 234.4, 11.1, 22.2, 500.0, 50.0, 11.1, 12.1,
600.6, 99.9, 0.0 }; vector<double> v2(darr, darr + 10);

double dal = 100.0;
LessThan<double > lt2(dal);

int count1 = count_if(v2.beg in(), v2.begin(), lt2);
cout << "There are " << count1 << " values less than " << dal
<< endl;

return 0;
}

Expected output should have been "There are 7 values less than 100",
but it actually comes up with: "There are 0 values less than 100". Why?

I'm using GCC 3.4.4 on Linux

Thanks
--
http://www.munted.org.uk

"Honestly, what can I possibly say to get you into my bed?" - Anon.

[Mark P]

Ready to kick yourself?

Alex Buell wrote:

#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>

using namespace std;

template <typename T>
class LessThan
{
private:
T comp;
public:
LessThan(T val) : comp(val) {}
void setComp(const T& val) { comp = val; }
T getComp(void) { return comp; } const
bool operator()(cons t T& value) { return value < comp; }
};

int main()
{
double darr[10] = { 234.4, 11.1, 22.2, 500.0, 50.0, 11.1, 12.1,
600.6, 99.9, 0.0 }; vector<double> v2(darr, darr + 10);

double dal = 100.0;
LessThan<double > lt2(dal);

int count1 = count_if(v2.beg in(), v2.begin(), lt2);
Hmm, begin() to begin()... :)

-Mark
cout << "There are " << count1 << " values less than " << dal
<< endl;

return 0;
}

Expected output should have been "There are 7 values less than 100",
but it actually comes up with: "There are 0 values less than 100". Why?

I'm using GCC 3.4.4 on Linux

Thanks

[Alex Buell]

On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:17:00 GMT Mark P
<us****@fall200 5REMOVE.fastmai lCAPS.fm> waved a wand and this message
magically appeared:

int count1 = count_if(v2.beg in(), v2.begin(), lt2);

Hmm, begin() to begin()... :)

Doh! No wonder it didn't work as expected! lol, thanks.

--
http://www.munted.org.uk

"Honestly, what can I possibly say to get you into my bed?" - Anon.

[Alf P. Steinbach]

* Alex Buell:

#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>

using namespace std;

template <typename T>
class LessThan
Are you aware that the standard library provides std::less and
std::bind2nd, which together gives you this functionality?
{
private:
T comp;
public:
LessThan(T val) : comp(val) {}
void setComp(const T& val) { comp = val; }
T getComp(void) { return comp; } const
Note that that 'const' actually applies to the 'bool' on the line
below... 'getComp' should be declared as 'const'. Also, 'comp' would
IMO be a better name (I don't like 'computeSin' & friends...), and even
better, som other name than 'comp', e.g. just 'value'.
bool operator()(cons t T& value) { return value < comp; }
Should ideally be declared as 'const'.
};

int main()
{
double darr[10] = { 234.4, 11.1, 22.2, 500.0, 50.0, 11.1, 12.1,
600.6, 99.9, 0.0 }; vector<double> v2(darr, darr + 10);
The array 'darr' should ideally be declared 'const'.

Ditto for the vector 'v2', unless you plan on modifying the values.

double dal = 100.0;
LessThan<double > lt2(dal);

int count1 = count_if(v2.beg in(), v2.begin(), lt2);
cout << "There are " << count1 << " values less than " << dal
<< endl;

return 0;
}

Expected output should have been "There are 7 values less than 100",
but it actually comes up with: "There are 0 values less than 100". Why?

Perhaps you meant to use begin() and end() instead of begin() and begin()?
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?

[Alex Buell]

On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:22:25 +0100 "Alf P. Steinbach" <al***@start.no >
waved a wand and this message magically appeared:

int main()
{
double darr[10] = { 234.4, 11.1, 22.2, 500.0, 50.0, 11.1, 12.1,
600.6, 99.9, 0.0 }; vector<double> v2(darr, darr + 10);

The array 'darr' should ideally be declared 'const'.

Ditto for the vector 'v2', unless you plan on modifying the values.

Is there a good reason to declare them as const? Would it result in
better optimisations?

--
http://www.munted.org.uk

"Honestly, what can I possibly say to get you into my bed?" - Anon.

[Alf P. Steinbach]

* Alex Buell:

On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:22:25 +0100 "Alf P. Steinbach" <al***@start.no >
waved a wand and this message magically appeared:

int main()
{
double darr[10] = { 234.4, 11.1, 22.2, 500.0, 50.0, 11.1, 12.1,
600.6, 99.9, 0.0 }; vector<double> v2(darr, darr + 10); The array 'darr' should ideally be declared 'const'.

Ditto for the vector 'v2', unless you plan on modifying the values.

Is there a good reason to declare them as const?

Yes.

Would it result in better optimisations?

Probably not.

The habit of declaring things 'const', whenever possible, results in a
much better chance of a correct program.

If the program doesn't need to be correct you can make it arbitrarily
fast... ;-)
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?

[Alex Buell]

On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:35:21 +0100 "Alf P. Steinbach" <al***@start.no >
waved a wand and this message magically appeared:

Is there a good reason to declare them as const?
Yes.

Would it result in better optimisations?

Probably not.

The habit of declaring things 'const', whenever possible, results in a
much better chance of a correct program.

In case someone else comes along and tries to modify the values, no
doubt, yes?
If the program doesn't need to be correct you can make it arbitrarily
fast... ;-)

lol, that's true.

--
http://www.munted.org.uk

"Honestly, what can I possibly say to get you into my bed?" - Anon.