Hello everybody!
I was looking for PDf version of ISO C++ standard on several websites and I found
few documents. one here: http://www.techstreet.com/cgi-bin/de...oduct_id=49964
and it is named "INCITS-Adopted ISO/IEC Standard" and it tells me that this
version of standard was replaced by another review from year 2003.
I have my copy I purchased from same website many years ago and it says
ISO/IEC 14882-1998(E). Version from 2003 is different, in fact it is
786 pages instead of 732 pages for 1998 year version.
Does anyone now what is new in ISO C++ since 1998 ? Just curios if it is worth
to bye yr 2003 version to find out what new in those 54 pages ?
Just wondering if hash_map<> finally made it to standard ?
Cheers,
---
Alexei Polkhanov
Sr. Consultant/Software Systems Analyst
Tel: (604) 719-2515
E-mail: us****@monteaur eus.com http://www.monteaureus.com/ 11 2764
"Alexei Polkhanov" <us****@monteau reus.com> wrote in message
news:Er******** ************@no vus-tele.net... Hello everybody! I was looking for PDf version of ISO C++ standard on several websites and
I found few documents. one here:
http://www.techstreet.com/cgi-bin/de...oduct_id=49964 and it is named "INCITS-Adopted ISO/IEC Standard" and it tells me that
this version of standard was replaced by another review from year 2003.
I have my copy I purchased from same website many years ago and it says ISO/IEC 14882-1998(E). Version from 2003 is different, in fact it is 786 pages instead of 732 pages for 1998 year version.
Does anyone now what is new in ISO C++ since 1998 ? Just curios if it is
worth to bye yr 2003 version to find out what new in those 54 pages ?
Just wondering if hash_map<> finally made it to standard ?
2003 is a "bug fix". It has nothing new, only cleared certain implementation
issues. The upcoming major revision of the standard is still under
consideration and is cutely called "C++0x" in the community.
Ioannis Vranos
Just download it from somewhere else, I did. Paying for the C++
Standard is like paying to go for a walk. If I _did_ have the money,
then I'd make a _voluntary_ contribution, but charging for the C++
Standard is extortion.
"JKop" <NU**@NULL.NULL > wrote in message
news:hx******** **********@news .indigo.ie... Just download it from somewhere else, I did. Paying for the C++ Standard is like paying to go for a walk.
You've obviously never played golf.
If I _did_ have the money, then I'd make a _voluntary_ contribution, but charging for the C++ Standard is extortion.
From each according to his inclination? To each according to his
coercive power? I think you've delineated the Twenty-first Century
version of communism.
P.J. Plauger
Dinkumware, Ltd. http://www.dinkumware.com
JKop wrote: Just download it from somewhere else, I did. Paying for the C++ Standard is like paying to go for a walk. If I _did_ have the money, then I'd make a _voluntary_ contribution, but charging for the C++ Standard is extortion.
Do you steal other things you can't afford, too?
Jeff Schwab posted: JKop wrote: Just download it from somewhere else, I did. Paying for the C++ Standard is like paying to go for a walk. If I _did_ have the
money, then I'd make a _voluntary_ contribution, but charging for the C++ Standard is extortion.
Do you steal other things you can't afford, too?
Yes.
Why? Are _you_ too proud to? I've had numerous versions of Visual
Studio, none of them paid for.
-JKop
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:16:47 GMT, JKop <NU**@NULL.NULL > wrote: Jeff Schwab posted:
JKop wrote: Just download it from somewhere else, I did. Paying for the C++ Standard is like paying to go for a walk. If I _did_ have themoney, then I'd make a _voluntary_ contribution, but charging for the C++ Standard is extortion.
Do you steal other things you can't afford, too?
Yes.
Why? Are _you_ too proud to? I've had numerous versions of Visual Studio, none of them paid for.
-JKop
May I answer for Jeff? It's not a matter of being proud, it's a matter
of being HONEST, which is something anybody can afford, if he can
afford reading this newsgroup, at least. Remember that there are lots
of alternatives which are FREE. If you don't understand why being
honest has advantages, try to focus your attention on all those times
you treat somebody in a way you wouln't like to be treated yourself.
Sorry for being OT
Walter Tross wrote: On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:16:47 GMT, JKop <NU**@NULL.NULL > wrote:
Jeff Schwab posted:
JKop wrote:
Just download it from somewhere else, I did. Paying for the C++ Standard is like paying to go for a walk. If I _did_ have the
money,
then I'd make a _voluntary_ contribution, but charging for the C++ Standard is extortion.
Do you steal other things you can't afford, too?
Yes.
Why? Are _you_ too proud to? I've had numerous versions of Visual Studio, none of them paid for.
-JKop
May I answer for Jeff? It's not a matter of being proud, it's a matter of being HONEST, which is something anybody can afford, if he can afford reading this newsgroup, at least. Remember that there are lots of alternatives which are FREE. If you don't understand why being honest has advantages, try to focus your attention on all those times you treat somebody in a way you wouln't like to be treated yourself. Sorry for being OT
I agree. Having some sense of morality does not mean one is "too proud." This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: Claudio Jolowicz |
last post by:
Is it possible to store unique objects in an STL container?
Suppose an object of class C is unique:
class C
{
public:
C() {}
~C() {}
private:
|
by: DaKoadMunky |
last post by:
After having fancied myself a C++ programmer for the last nine years I figured
it was about time that I actually obtain a copy of the standard rather than
relying on other sources that claim to accurately represent the standard. Even
the best intentioned author or newsgroup poster is capable of inaccurately
representing the standard.
I followed the FAQ link to http://www.techstreet.com/ and searched for 14882 as
suggested.
That...
|
by: Prateek R Karandikar |
last post by:
The title of the section 1.3 is "Terms et definitions".
"et"? What is French doing here?
-- --
Abstraction is selective ignorance.
-Andrew Koenig
-- --
|
by: foo |
last post by:
I've been looking on the web to see if I could find a link that would
describe the difference between the 14882:1998 and the 14882:2003 C++
standard.
I found the following link:
http://www.acceleratedcpp.com/authors/koenig/c++std/revisions.pdf
But the above document is over 300 pages long, and it's not practical
for actually trying to determine what difference has been made that
would actually effect the langauge.
|
by: Neil Zanella |
last post by:
Hello,
When an "std::map<int, int> foobar;" statement appears in a C++ program
followed by a statement of the form "foobar;" where nothing has ever
been inserted at position 123 into map foobar, the C++ standard states
that a new element is created at position 123 and is initialized to
zero. That is, in this case, the pair (123, 0) is inserted into the
map.
I am interested in knowing what the standard says should happen in the
| |
by: zeroBlockadeTheSpammingtype |
last post by:
I've been checking out ANSI's webstore with the intention of getting a
copy of the C++ standard, and astonishingly it seems to be dated 2003!
Bjarne Stroustrup's site states that C++0x is still a long way from
completion, and nowhere else on the web seems to refer to the 1998
standard being replaced with a 2003 standard, so what's going on?
|
by: Steven T. Hatton |
last post by:
I wanted to take a look at the actual C Programming Language specification
which provides the libraries used by C++ in the <c*> Headers. A couple
days ago, I found it freely available on the internet. I originally
assumed it was an older, or draft version. I'm pretty sure what I have is
the same ISO/IEC 9899:1999, Programming languages ? C referenced in the C++
Standard. I'm now discovering that it is available in many places on the...
|
by: sg10241024 |
last post by:
Hello,
I included the header "iostream"
Why is there only the possiblity of including
#include<iostream>? From Visual C++ 6 I know the iostream.h.
The name doesnt't really interest me. But it should work. The library
consists of the commands like "cout", "cin", ... But if I want to use
|
by: Sreenivas |
last post by:
I want to know the standards document of the c++ language .Where can
i get??
How different is c++ from vc++?
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
| |
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
| |
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
| |