What's the difference between these two ways of adding delegates to a Generic List object?

[Deckarep]

Dear CSharp Group,

Both of these techniques work as expected but what is the better way of
doing this? Or does it even make a difference?

Method 1:

public delegate void MyDelegate(stri ng s); //delegate

List<MyDelegate listOfDelegates = new List<MyDelegate >(); //Generic
List of Delegates

listOfDelegates .Add( myFunc1 );
listOfDelegates .Add( myFunc2 );

Method 2:

listOfDelegates .Add( new MyDelegate(myFu nc1) );
listOfDelegates .Add( new MyDelegate(myFu nc2) );
So when I loop through my list I can call the functions and they both
work the same. Is one method more better then the other? All I can
tell is that the 2nd method I'm first creating a new Delegate and
passing in my function then adding it. The first method doesn't create
the new Delegate object.

So which is recommended and can I get bad side effects with one way or
the other?

Thanks in advance guys.

[Jon Shemitz]

Deckarep wrote:

Both of these techniques work as expected but what is the better way of
doing this? Or does it even make a difference?

public delegate void MyDelegate(stri ng s); //delegate

List<MyDelegate listOfDelegates = new List<MyDelegate >(); //Generic

listOfDelegates .Add( myFunc1 );
listOfDelegates .Add( myFunc2 );

listOfDelegates .Add( new MyDelegate(myFu nc1) );
listOfDelegates .Add( new MyDelegate(myFu nc2) );

No difference, except that your Method 1 is a bit smaller and clearer.

That is, "listOfDelegate s.Add( myFunc1 );" uses a simplified syntax,
but if you use Reflector to look at your code, you'll see that it
generates the exact same CIL as "listOfDelegate s.Add( new
MyDelegate(myFu nc1) );".

--

..NET 2.0 for Delphi Programmers
www.midnightbeach.com/.net