473,598 Members | 2,916 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
+ Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Singleton SqlConnection object

Hello,

I have implemented the singleton pattern for a class to hold a
SqlConnection object that
will be used thruout the application to create commands. My application
is a simple Windows Form
Application that connects to a MSDE Database. I was reading the thread
yesterday on this very
same subject, but it only mentioned ASP.NET Applications. Can anyone
tell me if it's a good idea
to have one single SqlConnection Object in the application. Please note
that the Singleton Class
has been configured to be thread-safe. Below is some of the code I am
using to call the instance
of my Singleton class:

SqlCommand command = DB_Connection.I nstance.Connect ion.CreateComma nd();

Once I am done with the connection, I close it down:

command.Connect ion.Open();

//Do stuff here

command.Connect ion.Close();

I also dispose of the command object to make sure I free up resources.
Any information, suggestions, critiques
will be welcomed!
Nov 17 '05 #1
16 13971

"ed_p" <ed*@noe-mail.com> wrote in message
news:uV******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP09.phx.gbl...
Hello,

I have implemented the singleton pattern for a class to hold a
SqlConnection object that
will be used thruout the application to create commands. My application
is a simple Windows Form
Application that connects to a MSDE Database. I was reading the thread
yesterday on this very
same subject, but it only mentioned ASP.NET Applications. Can anyone tell
me if it's a good idea
to have one single SqlConnection Object in the application. Please note
that the Singleton Class
has been configured to be thread-safe. Below is some of the code I am
using to call the instance
of my Singleton class:


In a winforms application all the code runs on the same thread (unliess you
explicitly use threading). So using a singleton connection object will be
just fine. If you need to access the database from a background thread, you
would not want to use your "global" connection.

David
Nov 17 '05 #2
Dave,

Thanks for the quick reply, so even though I made the class thread-safe
I still would not be able to use it from a backgroud thread?

David Browne wrote:
"ed_p" <ed*@noe-mail.com> wrote in message
news:uV******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP09.phx.gbl...
Hello,

I have implemented the singleton pattern for a class to hold a
SqlConnecti on object that
will be used thruout the application to create commands. My application
is a simple Windows Form
Application that connects to a MSDE Database. I was reading the thread
yesterday on this very
same subject, but it only mentioned ASP.NET Applications. Can anyone tell
me if it's a good idea
to have one single SqlConnection Object in the application. Please note
that the Singleton Class
has been configured to be thread-safe. Below is some of the code I am
using to call the instance
of my Singleton class:

In a winforms application all the code runs on the same thread (unliess you
explicitly use threading). So using a singleton connection object will be
just fine. If you need to access the database from a background thread, you
would not want to use your "global" connection.

David

Nov 17 '05 #3

"ed_p" <ed*@noe-mail.com> wrote in message
news:uV******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP09.phx.gbl...
I have implemented the singleton pattern for a class to hold a
SqlConnection object that
will be used thruout the application to create commands.


Why?

"When you use the .NET Framework Data Provider for SQL Server, you do not
need to enable connection pooling because the provider manages this
automatically"

The only overhead you'll incurr by creating a SqlConnection on an "as
needed" basis is the object creation itself. If that's a problem for your
application then I suppose using a singleton makes sense. Otherwise, I would
not.
Nov 17 '05 #4
Ron
If the connection string doesn't change, it's really not a good idea to keep
the connection open all along (if it ever is a good idea...). Conversely,
it's a great idea to use connection pooling. If you use connection pooling,
when you create a new connection object, you are actually getting an instance
from the pool so there is no real overhead. When you close a connection, you
are not really disposing the object but it goes back to the pool. This is
already optimized as is.

"Scott Roberts" wrote:

"ed_p" <ed*@noe-mail.com> wrote in message
news:uV******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP09.phx.gbl...
I have implemented the singleton pattern for a class to hold a
SqlConnection object that
will be used thruout the application to create commands.


Why?

"When you use the .NET Framework Data Provider for SQL Server, you do not
need to enable connection pooling because the provider manages this
automatically"

The only overhead you'll incurr by creating a SqlConnection on an "as
needed" basis is the object creation itself. If that's a problem for your
application then I suppose using a singleton makes sense. Otherwise, I would
not.

Nov 17 '05 #5
Hi ed_p,
there are quite a few reasons not to do this:

1. If you are running in a multithreaded environment then you do not want
multiple threads executing commands on the same connection, since this could
cause exceptions to be thrown if they both try to utilize the connection at
the same time.

2. Connections should not be kept open for too long, by keeping this
connection to yourself you are tying it up so that other resources cannot use
it. You may keep it open even if you are not using it. Usually you want to
get the connection, use it and close it ASAP.

3. By keeping the connection open for long periods of time you are
increasing the likelyhood that the connection gets forecfully closed from the
database side i.e. by the sys admin or a firewall detects the connection has
been idle for a long time and kills the connection etc. You will need
tobuild code into your class to handle these cases i.e. check the connnection
is still open etc. This is an unnecessary hassle for you.

4. .Net handles this kind of scenario behind the scenes using a Connection
Pool. When you open a connection it initially takes some time to connect, but
from there on whenever you call Close, really the connection is not closed
straight away but returned to a connection pool, ready to be used again.
Next time you call Open you will get an open connection from the pool
immediately without any overhead. So there is really no need to have a
singleton object for your connection.
Infact I had to spend my time recently fixing someone elses code who just
left where I work. He had made a static connection object on the class in a
multi threaded environment, not very pretty :-)

Mark R Dawson
http://www.markdawson.org

"ed_p" wrote:
Hello,

I have implemented the singleton pattern for a class to hold a
SqlConnection object that
will be used thruout the application to create commands. My application
is a simple Windows Form
Application that connects to a MSDE Database. I was reading the thread
yesterday on this very
same subject, but it only mentioned ASP.NET Applications. Can anyone
tell me if it's a good idea
to have one single SqlConnection Object in the application. Please note
that the Singleton Class
has been configured to be thread-safe. Below is some of the code I am
using to call the instance
of my Singleton class:

SqlCommand command = DB_Connection.I nstance.Connect ion.CreateComma nd();

Once I am done with the connection, I close it down:

command.Connect ion.Open();

//Do stuff here

command.Connect ion.Close();

I also dispose of the command object to make sure I free up resources.
Any information, suggestions, critiques
will be welcomed!

Nov 17 '05 #6

"Mark R. Dawson" <Ma*********@di scussions.micro soft.com> wrote in message
news:38******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com...
Hi ed_p,
there are quite a few reasons not to do this:

1. If you are running in a multithreaded environment then you do not want
multiple threads executing commands on the same connection, since this
could
cause exceptions to be thrown if they both try to utilize the connection
at
the same time.

2. Connections should not be kept open for too long, by keeping this
connection to yourself you are tying it up so that other resources cannot
use
it. You may keep it open even if you are not using it. Usually you want
to
get the connection, use it and close it ASAP.

3. By keeping the connection open for long periods of time you are
increasing the likelyhood that the connection gets forecfully closed from
the
database side i.e. by the sys admin or a firewall detects the connection
has
been idle for a long time and kills the connection etc. You will need
tobuild code into your class to handle these cases i.e. check the
connnection
is still open etc. This is an unnecessary hassle for you.

4. .Net handles this kind of scenario behind the scenes using a Connection
Pool. When you open a connection it initially takes some time to connect,
but
from there on whenever you call Close, really the connection is not closed
straight away but returned to a connection pool, ready to be used again.
Next time you call Open you will get an open connection from the pool
immediately without any overhead. So there is really no need to have a
singleton object for your connection.


1 and 2 don't apply to Winforms apps. 3 isn't helped by pooling as you
still generally need code to detect broken connections.

The problem with 4 is that when you use connections at places in the stack
you will open multiple connections and consequently cannot enlist the
changes in a single transaction.

David
Nov 17 '05 #7

"ed_p" <ed*@noe-mail.com> wrote in message
news:e1******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP09.phx.gbl...
Dave,

Thanks for the quick reply, so even though I made the class thread-safe I
still would not be able to use it from a backgroud thread?


Even if

SqlCommand command = DB_Connection.I nstance.Connect ion.CreateComma nd();

is thread-safe, you cannot use the returned command if another thread may be
using the connection, so you would have to syncronize the entire block in
which the SqlCommand is used.

David
Nov 17 '05 #8
David Browne wrote:

"Mark R. Dawson" <Ma*********@di scussions.micro soft.com> wrote in
message news:38******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com...
Hi ed_p,
there are quite a few reasons not to do this:

1. If you are running in a multithreaded environment then you do
not want multiple threads executing commands on the same
connection, since this could cause exceptions to be thrown if they
both try to utilize the connection at the same time.

2. Connections should not be kept open for too long, by keeping this
connection to yourself you are tying it up so that other resources
cannot use it. You may keep it open even if you are not using it.
Usually you want to get the connection, use it and close it ASAP.
[...] 1 and 2 don't apply to Winforms apps.


2 certainly applies when connecting to a shared database server. That's
plain client/server with its inherent scalability problems

Cheers,
--
http://www.joergjooss.de
mailto:ne****** **@joergjooss.d e
Nov 17 '05 #9

"Joerg Jooss" <ne********@joe rgjooss.de> wrote in message
news:xn******** ********@msnews .microsoft.com. ..
David Browne wrote:

"Mark R. Dawson" <Ma*********@di scussions.micro soft.com> wrote in
message news:38******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com...
> Hi ed_p,
> there are quite a few reasons not to do this:
>
> 1. If you are running in a multithreaded environment then you do
> not want multiple threads executing commands on the same
> connection, since this could cause exceptions to be thrown if they
> both try to utilize the connection at the same time.
>
> 2. Connections should not be kept open for too long, by keeping this
> connection to yourself you are tying it up so that other resources
> cannot use it. You may keep it open even if you are not using it.
> Usually you want to get the connection, use it and close it ASAP.
>

[...]
1 and 2 don't apply to Winforms apps.


2 certainly applies when connecting to a shared database server. That's
plain client/server with its inherent scalability problems


It's a winforms app. Whether or not you use a the connection pool it's a
client/server application. Moreover all applications have "scalabilit y
problems", and they aren't problems until you hit the scalability limits.
Moreover again, scalability problems with client/server have largely been
erased by advances in hardware. The number of simultaneous (idle)
connections a DB server can manage is purely a function of how much memory
it has. Database servers with gigabytes of memory can handle a whole lot of
clients.

David
Nov 17 '05 #10

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

1
6825
by: Ramesh | last post by:
hi, Can we use SQLConnection object to connect to oracle? I understand that for connecting Oracle we have to use only ODP.net (or) OLEDB Object. Is it correct? Please... Thanks, Ramesh
3
3396
by: The Real Andy | last post by:
OK, please excuse the simple (ambiguous) nature of this question. I have a winform, set up as a base class. I inherit about 5 instances from this form, each relating to a db table. Currently I am using some code in a method that launches the inherited form. In this method I check if an instance of the form already exists, and give focus if it does exist. Is there an easier way? I figure if I can some how set up a static method in the...
2
1649
by: Julia | last post by:
Hi, My RemoteServer is a singleton remote object hosted by windows service and accessed by ASP.NET application using remoting,server activated Basically my RemoteServer need to send several email message types,and it have a single method Send(string To,string Body,int type)
2
1193
by: MrMike | last post by:
I have a web.config file containing the SQLConnection String to a SQL Database. Before I implemented this SQLConnection String into web.config, I had individual SQLConnection objects in each webform's designer tray. I am now going back through the webforms and replacing the individual SQLConnection Objects with a pointer to web.config ConnectionString. However, whenever I delete the SQLConnection String objects from each webform, they...
0
1081
by: Mike Kansky | last post by:
Is there a way to force SqlConnection object to use SQLNCLI provider (Native Sql Client)? If i put Provider=SQLNCLI in the connection string i get: System.ArgumentException: Keyword not supported: 'provider'. Thank you!
3
1929
by: pratham | last post by:
Hi and regards What is best method to have an connection to sql, iam using sqlserver 1. have an sqlconnection open when the application start event in global.asax so that i dont have to open it in each method where i require to open an connection 2. open an connection in seesion so that, it is available in session of the user thorugh out
4
3883
by: Victor | last post by:
Hi Guys I have a problem here. I want to improve the performance for a website. When I looked into the system, I have found that the system made the "SqlConnection Object" static. That mean only one SqlConnection object will be used. Can someone tell me is that a correct way to do? Does that affect the system performance? Cheers Victor
1
1399
by: bytesFlast | last post by:
Hi all, I would like to know what performance difference can arise if I use separate SQLConnection objects on each Form of a Multi-Form Windows .NET Application and a Single Common/Global SQL Connection Object for all te Forms. Many thanks, Flast.
0
7981
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look ! Part I. Meaning of...
0
8284
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed. This is as boiled down as I can make it. Here is my compilation command: g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp Here is the code in...
0
6711
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own.... Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
1
5847
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM). In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules. He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms. Adolph will...
0
5437
by: conductexam | last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one. At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image. Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
0
3938
by: adsilva | last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
1
2410
by: 6302768590 | last post by:
Hai team i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
1
1500
muto222
by: muto222 | last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
0
1245
bsmnconsultancy
by: bsmnconsultancy | last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.