Number of CPUs

[Urs Vogel]

Hi

When measuring the thread pool with ThreadPool.GetM axThreads(..), it returns
25 threads per CPU. On a hyper threaded machine, though, it returns 50
threads, still only having one CPU. How do I accurately determine the
physical CPU count? Any idea?

Thanks, Urs

[Helge Jensen]

Urs Vogel wrote:

threads, still only having one CPU. How do I accurately determine the
physical CPU count? Any idea?

I would guess WMI would be the route to take, but more importantly, how
come you need to know the physical CPU-count?

Note that "physical cpu-count" has been a rather vague term for quite a
while now. All recent CPU's have multiple, concurrent computational units.

--
Helge Jensen
mailto:he****** ****@slog.dk
sip:he********* *@slog.dk
-=> Sebastian cover-music: http://ungdomshus.nu <=-

[Urs Vogel]

Thanks Helge

I need it for licensing purposes for an application server. Hyper threaded
CPUs must still count as ONE CPU.

Urs

"Helge Jensen" <he**********@s log.dk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:42******** ******@slog.dk. ..

Urs Vogel wrote:

threads, still only having one CPU. How do I accurately determine the
physical CPU count? Any idea?

I would guess WMI would be the route to take, but more importantly, how
come you need to know the physical CPU-count?

Note that "physical cpu-count" has been a rather vague term for quite a
while now. All recent CPU's have multiple, concurrent computational units.

--
Helge Jensen
mailto:he****** ****@slog.dk
sip:he********* *@slog.dk
-=> Sebastian cover-music: http://ungdomshus.nu <=-

[Willy Denoyette [MVP]]

"Urs Vogel" <uv****@msn.com > wrote in message
news:%2******** **********@TK2M SFTNGP09.phx.gb l...

Hi

When measuring the thread pool with ThreadPool.GetM axThreads(..), it
returns 25 threads per CPU. On a hyper threaded machine, though, it
returns 50 threads, still only having one CPU. How do I accurately
determine the physical CPU count? Any idea?

Thanks, Urs

Read the NUMBER_OF_PROCE SSORS environment variable, or use System.Manageme nt
and the WMI class Win32_processor .
Note that each core (logical CPU) is treated as a separate CPU by the OS, so
the value returned by GetMaxThreads is valid as far as the CLR is concerned.

Willy.

[Bob Grommes]

I would not rely on any formula involving the maximum threads per processor
for the simple reason that this value can change with some future build of
the framework. In any case, WMI or some Win32 call surely exists for
determining that. Try Googling on:

"determine number of processors" windows

.... or similar.

--Bob

"Urs Vogel" <uv****@msn.com > wrote in message
news:%2******** **********@TK2M SFTNGP09.phx.gb l...

Hi

When measuring the thread pool with ThreadPool.GetM axThreads(..), it
returns 25 threads per CPU. On a hyper threaded machine, though, it
returns 50 threads, still only having one CPU. How do I accurately
determine the physical CPU count? Any idea?

Thanks, Urs

[Urs Vogel]

Bob

found the following, looks rigth into the CPU(s), checks for Hyperthreading
and even retrieves the logical and physical CPU IDs:

http://www.intel.com/cd/ids/develope...base/43838.htm

Thanks. Urs

"Bob Grommes" <bo*@bobgrommes .com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:O1******** ******@tk2msftn gp13.phx.gbl...

I would not rely on any formula involving the maximum threads per processor
for the simple reason that this value can change with some future build of
the framework. In any case, WMI or some Win32 call surely exists for
determining that. Try Googling on:

"determine number of processors" windows

... or similar.

--Bob

"Urs Vogel" <uv****@msn.com > wrote in message
news:%2******** **********@TK2M SFTNGP09.phx.gb l...

Hi

When measuring the thread pool with ThreadPool.GetM axThreads(..), it
returns 25 threads per CPU. On a hyper threaded machine, though, it
returns 50 threads, still only having one CPU. How do I accurately
determine the physical CPU count? Any idea?

Thanks, Urs