Hi all,
I had a code like the follow:
class A{
...
public void get(int i,params OleDbParameter[] p)
{
if((p!=null)||( p.Length>0))
{
// Do some work
}
else
{
// Do another work
}
}
....
}
And in other class I had create the instance which include this method , and
I had not the OleDbParameter[] parameter tranfer to this method.And I try to
do it like this to call the method:
....
A _a=new A();
int i=100;
_a.get(i,(OleDb Parameter[])null);
....
But when it run to the method it throw me a "NullRefranceEx ception"
How can I solve this problem? Why I can't give it the null value as the
parameter tranfer to the get() method? I also declare the null value as the
type OleDbParameter[]. 5 3143
Jet wrote: Hi all, I had a code like the follow: class A{ ... public void get(int i,params OleDbParameter[] p) { if((p!=null)||( p.Length>0))
Do you actually mean
if((p!=null)&&( p.Length>0))
?
{ // Do some work }
Everything else looks OK.
--
Larry Lard
Replies to group please
If a parameter is modifed with the "params" keyword, you can completely ignore the parameter, however, the framework guarantees that
the Array will be initialized and empty:
public void MyMethod(int i, params OleDbParameter[] p)
{
if (p.Length > 0)
{
// Todo: work
}
}
MyMethod( 100 ); // ignores the parameter array argument
--
Dave Sexton dave@www..jwaon line..com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Jet" <li******@126.c om> wrote in message news:%2******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP15.phx.gbl. .. Hi all, I had a code like the follow: class A{ ... public void get(int i,params OleDbParameter[] p) { if((p!=null)||( p.Length>0)) { // Do some work } else { // Do another work }
} ... } And in other class I had create the instance which include this method , and I had not the OleDbParameter[] parameter tranfer to this method.And I try to do it like this to call the method: ... A _a=new A(); int i=100; _a.get(i,(OleDb Parameter[])null); ...
But when it run to the method it throw me a "NullRefranceEx ception" How can I solve this problem? Why I can't give it the null value as the parameter tranfer to the get() method? I also declare the null value as the type OleDbParameter[].
Dave <NO*********@do tcomdatasolutio ns.com> wrote: If a parameter is modifed with the "params" keyword, you can completely ignore the parameter, however, the framework guarantees that the Array will be initialized and empty:
public void MyMethod(int i, params OleDbParameter[] p) { if (p.Length > 0) { // Todo: work } }
MyMethod( 100 ); // ignores the parameter array argument
No, it's not guaranteed to be non-null - the caller can specify a null
value as the OP actually had. I believe that Larry nailed the problem.
Here's an example of a params parameter being null:
using System;
class Test
{
static void Main()
{
SomeMethod((str ing[])null);
}
static void SomeMethod(para ms string[] names)
{
if (names==null)
{
Console.WriteLi ne ("I'm null!");
}
else
{
foreach (string name in names)
{
Console.WriteLi ne (name);
}
}
}
}
--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.co m> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
Yes, you are right.
I tried and it seems that just passing "null", without casting, works too.
So, it gaurantees that the value will be initialized empty unless the caller explicitly passes null.
Sound good?
--
Dave Sexton dave@www..jwaon line..com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <sk***@pobox.co m> wrote in message news:MP******** *************** *@msnews.micros oft.com... Dave <NO*********@do tcomdatasolutio ns.com> wrote: If a parameter is modifed with the "params" keyword, you can completely ignore the parameter, however, the framework guarantees that the Array will be initialized and empty:
public void MyMethod(int i, params OleDbParameter[] p) { if (p.Length > 0) { // Todo: work } }
MyMethod( 100 ); // ignores the parameter array argument
No, it's not guaranteed to be non-null - the caller can specify a null value as the OP actually had. I believe that Larry nailed the problem.
Here's an example of a params parameter being null:
using System;
class Test { static void Main() { SomeMethod((str ing[])null); }
static void SomeMethod(para ms string[] names) { if (names==null) { Console.WriteLi ne ("I'm null!"); } else { foreach (string name in names) { Console.WriteLi ne (name); } } } }
-- Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.co m> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet If replying to the group, please do not mail me too
Dave <NO*********@do tcomdatasolutio ns.com> wrote: Yes, you are right.
I tried and it seems that just passing "null", without casting, works too.
Right. I like to make it explicit, so it's clear I'm not trying to pass
a single string parameter.
So, it gaurantees that the value will be initialized empty unless the caller explicitly passes null.
Sound good?
Yup.
--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.co m> http://www.pobox.com/~skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: Chris Herring |
last post by:
Hi there: Well, let me start off by saying that I am a Visual Studio drag
and drop weenie, not a real programmer. So I tend to get confused when
things do not look like the instructions said they were going to look :) .
Here is my current dilemma:
I am having a strange problem with my ASP.NET application. I am building the
application using Visual Basic .Net in Visual Studio.NET 2003. Lately, I
have frequently been getting the following...
|
by: PK |
last post by:
Hi, I have an application that opens a Crystal report document and
passes in a value to a parameter in the report (pointing to an Oracle
DB). However, if I want to pass a "null" value to retrieve all records
that have no data for the specified field that the parameter is a
condition of (ie. SELECT * from <table> where <field> is null"), it
returns nothing. I think CR is building the SQL statement like "SELECT
* from <table> where <field>...
|
by: Andrew Baker |
last post by:
I have the following code that calles a stored proc in SQLServer. When the
output parameter @custref is null (System.DBNull) I cant seem to find a
test for this and I get an exception. I know I could coalesce the stored
proc, but I would like to know if the value is null.
How do you test for null in the returned parameter of a stored proc?
TIA
Andrew.
Dim retstr As String = ""
|
by: Mark A |
last post by:
DB2 8.2 for Linux, FP 10 (also performs the same on DB2 8.2 for Windoes, FP
11).
Using the SAMPLE database, tables EMP and EMLOYEE.
In the followng stored procedure, 2 NULL columns (COMM) are selected into 2
different SP variables and compared for equal. They are both NULL, but do
not compare as equal. When the Not NULL columns (SALARY) are compared, they
do compare as equal.
|
by: John |
last post by:
I just cannot manage to perform a SELECT query with NULL parameter...
My CATEGORY table does have one row where TCATEGORYPARENTID is null (real DB
null value).
TCATEGORYID and TCATEGORYPARENTID are uniqueidentifier columns.
My questions:
- is Type="Object", below, necessary?
- what shall I specify for DefaultValue in my function? I tried everything.
| |
by: Weeble |
last post by:
Back in C++, I had a type that looked something like this (entering
from memory so this might not quite compile):
template <class T>
class NotNull
{
private:
T* value;
public:
NotNull(T* ptr)
|
by: MikeT |
last post by:
This may sound very elementary, but can you trap when your object is
set to null within the object?
I have created a class that registers an event from an object passed
in the constructor. When my object is destroyed, I want my object to
un-register this event. If I don't then the object would never be
destroyed until the object I passed in the constructor is destroyed.
I have implemented a Dispose(), Dispose(bool), and ~Finalize...
|
by: valentin tihomirov |
last post by:
As explained in "Using pointers vs. references"
http://groups.google.ee/group/borland.public.delphi.objectpascal/browse_thread/thread/683c30f161fc1e9c/ab294c7b02e8faca#ab294c7b02e8faca ,
the pointers are allowed to be null, while references must refer an existing
variable of required type. The null is normally used for making optional
parameters. But there is no way to pass null reference in C#. Something is
missing.
|
by: justice750 |
last post by:
Hi All,
I am using a FormView control. The allows me to update records in the database. However, when a database field is null I can not update the field on the form. It works fine when the field is not a null value. I am not using any code behind (C#) to bind the data or manipulate the data.
I have read that when there is a null value in the database that there is no record in the "dataset". Can anyone show me how to bind a value in the...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
| |
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
|
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| |
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |