Is Degradation in Quality Necessary?

[Cecil Windham]

I'm using the following code to rotate an image (jpeg or gif), and have
discovered that there is a significant degradation in the quality of the
photo.

Just wondering if there is a way to rotate/flip a graphic in .NET *without*
data loss. If so, how? If not, why?

I understand that when *resizing* a graphic, some degradation in the
appearance will result from the loss of data. However, when it comes to
simply rotating or flipping a graphic, is it necessary that any data loss
will occur?

System.IO.FileS tream fs = new System.IO.FileS tream(pathToOri ginal,
System.IO.FileM ode.Open, System.IO.FileA ccess.ReadWrite );
System.Drawing. Image imageToFlip = System.Drawing. Image.FromStrea m(fs);
imageToFlip.Rot ateFlip(System. Drawing.RotateF lipType.Rotate9 0FlipNone);
// then either of these depending on the origina'ls format (jpeg or gif):
imageToFlip.Sav e(pathToOrigina l, System.Drawing. Imaging.ImageFo rmat.Jpeg);
imageToFlip.Sav e(pathToOrigina l, System.Drawing. Imaging.ImageFo rmat.Gif);

Thanks.

[Julie]

Cecil Windham wrote:

I'm using the following code to rotate an image (jpeg or gif), and have
discovered that there is a significant degradation in the quality of the
photo.

Just wondering if there is a way to rotate/flip a graphic in .NET *without*
data loss. If so, how? If not, why?

I understand that when *resizing* a graphic, some degradation in the
appearance will result from the loss of data. However, when it comes to
simply rotating or flipping a graphic, is it necessary that any data loss
will occur?

System.IO.FileS tream fs = new System.IO.FileS tream(pathToOri ginal,
System.IO.FileM ode.Open, System.IO.FileA ccess.ReadWrite );
System.Drawing. Image imageToFlip = System.Drawing. Image.FromStrea m(fs);
imageToFlip.Rot ateFlip(System. Drawing.RotateF lipType.Rotate9 0FlipNone);
// then either of these depending on the origina'ls format (jpeg or gif):
imageToFlip.Sav e(pathToOrigina l, System.Drawing. Imaging.ImageFo rmat.Jpeg);
imageToFlip.Sav e(pathToOrigina l, System.Drawing. Imaging.ImageFo rmat.Gif);

Thanks.

As you are aware, jpeg compression is lossy. During a rotate, the image has to
be decompressed, rotated, and then recompressed. The recompression will cause
inevitable loss of quality.

I don't know the details of the compressor, but most jpeg compressors have a
quality (and other) settings to be used during compression. The default may be
to minimize size (at the expense of visual quality). Check the docs and see if
you can change to a higher quality compression.

[Colin Young]

Just to add to this response, there is a way to do a lossless rotation of a
JPEG image. A search on Google should turn up some results since it is
widely used in digital image catalogue programs.

Colin

"Julie" <ju***@nospam.c om> wrote in message
news:40******** *******@nospam. com...

Cecil Windham wrote:

I'm using the following code to rotate an image (jpeg or gif), and have
discovered that there is a significant degradation in the quality of the
photo.

Just wondering if there is a way to rotate/flip a graphic in .NET *without* data loss. If so, how? If not, why?

I understand that when *resizing* a graphic, some degradation in the
appearance will result from the loss of data. However, when it comes to
simply rotating or flipping a graphic, is it necessary that any data loss will occur?

System.IO.FileS tream fs = new System.IO.FileS tream(pathToOri ginal,
System.IO.FileM ode.Open, System.IO.FileA ccess.ReadWrite );
System.Drawing. Image imageToFlip = System.Drawing. Image.FromStrea m(fs);
imageToFlip.Rot ateFlip(System. Drawing.RotateF lipType.Rotate9 0FlipNone);
// then either of these depending on the origina'ls format (jpeg or gif): imageToFlip.Sav e(pathToOrigina l, System.Drawing. Imaging.ImageFo rmat.Jpeg); imageToFlip.Sav e(pathToOrigina l, System.Drawing. Imaging.ImageFo rmat.Gif);
Thanks.
As you are aware, jpeg compression is lossy. During a rotate, the image

has to be decompressed, rotated, and then recompressed. The recompression will cause inevitable loss of quality.

I don't know the details of the compressor, but most jpeg compressors have a quality (and other) settings to be used during compression. The default may be to minimize size (at the expense of visual quality). Check the docs and see if you can change to a higher quality compression.