473,803 Members | 3,725 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
+ Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Disable Button With Javascript

Hello,

In my C# asp.net 2.0 application, I have a webform with a button server
control on it. The webform, like most others in the site, subscribes to
a master page. I have determined that the button always renders with an
id of "ct100_ContentP laceHolder1_btn Continue" in both the IE and
Firefox browsers.

I created the following javascript code segment to disable it when the
page loads. I have reasons for not wanting to do this with server side
code...

document.all['ct100_ContentP laceHolder1_btn Continue'].disabled = true;

Now, when I view this in IE, the button is disabled. But when I view it
in Firefox, it's not. Also, there are no javascript errors returned by
either browser. Also, I have already updated my browserCaps section in
web.config, if that is relevant.

Why does the button remain enabled when viewing the page with Firefox?

Sep 20 '06 #1
11 7388
YOu need to actually query, in code behind, to determine what the postback
event is for the control and emit the JavaScript accordingly. I am not sure
this conquers all Firefox issues, but it guarantees a proper path down the
rabbit hole even if you rename the control for some reason. I do not have a
sample for this.

If you have to go absolutely generic, you can get the control that posted
from Request["EVENTTARGE T"], but this does not work with all controls.

--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA

*************** *************** *************** ****
Think outside of the box!
*************** *************** *************** ****
"Joey" <jo*********@to pscene.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ h48g2000cwc.goo glegroups.com.. .
Hello,

In my C# asp.net 2.0 application, I have a webform with a button server
control on it. The webform, like most others in the site, subscribes to
a master page. I have determined that the button always renders with an
id of "ct100_ContentP laceHolder1_btn Continue" in both the IE and
Firefox browsers.

I created the following javascript code segment to disable it when the
page loads. I have reasons for not wanting to do this with server side
code...

document.all['ct100_ContentP laceHolder1_btn Continue'].disabled = true;

Now, when I view this in IE, the button is disabled. But when I view it
in Firefox, it's not. Also, there are no javascript errors returned by
either browser. Also, I have already updated my browserCaps section in
web.config, if that is relevant.

Why does the button remain enabled when viewing the page with Firefox?

Sep 20 '06 #2
Joey,

This code works for me. Be sure to declare your DTD as XHTML 1.1
Transitional. You may find that helps because the way the disabled
attribute was handled has changed since the HTML 3.2 spec.

<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
function disableButton(b uttonId) {
if (document.all) {
var btn = document.all[buttonId; btn.disabled = 'true';
}
else {
var btn = document.getEle mentById(button Id); btn.disabled = 'true';
}
}
// -->
</script>

....

<!-- After button is defined -->
<script type="text/javascript">
disableButton(' ct100_ContentPl aceHolder1_btnC ontinue');
</script>
Brennan Stehling
http://brennan.offwhite.net/blog/

Joey wrote:
Hello,

In my C# asp.net 2.0 application, I have a webform with a button server
control on it. The webform, like most others in the site, subscribes to
a master page. I have determined that the button always renders with an
id of "ct100_ContentP laceHolder1_btn Continue" in both the IE and
Firefox browsers.

I created the following javascript code segment to disable it when the
page loads. I have reasons for not wanting to do this with server side
code...

document.all['ct100_ContentP laceHolder1_btn Continue'].disabled = true;

Now, when I view this in IE, the button is disabled. But when I view it
in Firefox, it's not. Also, there are no javascript errors returned by
either browser. Also, I have already updated my browserCaps section in
web.config, if that is relevant.

Why does the button remain enabled when viewing the page with Firefox?
Sep 20 '06 #3
document.all is an IE only collection, it does not exist in the w3c
standard, so it works in ie only. use the w3c standard:

document.getEle mentById('ct100 _ContentPlaceHo lder1_btnContin ue').disabled =
true;

-- bruce (sqlwork.com)

"Joey" <jo*********@to pscene.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ h48g2000cwc.goo glegroups.com.. .
Hello,

In my C# asp.net 2.0 application, I have a webform with a button server
control on it. The webform, like most others in the site, subscribes to
a master page. I have determined that the button always renders with an
id of "ct100_ContentP laceHolder1_btn Continue" in both the IE and
Firefox browsers.

I created the following javascript code segment to disable it when the
page loads. I have reasons for not wanting to do this with server side
code...

document.all['ct100_ContentP laceHolder1_btn Continue'].disabled = true;

Now, when I view this in IE, the button is disabled. But when I view it
in Firefox, it's not. Also, there are no javascript errors returned by
either browser. Also, I have already updated my browserCaps section in
web.config, if that is relevant.

Why does the button remain enabled when viewing the page with Firefox?

Sep 20 '06 #4
Can you provide a simple example as to how to query, in code behind,
for the correct id?

Cowboy (Gregory A. Beamer) wrote:
YOu need to actually query, in code behind, to determine what the postback
event is for the control and emit the JavaScript accordingly. I am not sure
this conquers all Firefox issues, but it guarantees a proper path down the
rabbit hole even if you rename the control for some reason. I do not have a
sample for this.

If you have to go absolutely generic, you can get the control that posted
from Request["EVENTTARGE T"], but this does not work with all controls.

--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA

*************** *************** *************** ****
Think outside of the box!
*************** *************** *************** ****
"Joey" <jo*********@to pscene.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ h48g2000cwc.goo glegroups.com.. .
Hello,

In my C# asp.net 2.0 application, I have a webform with a button server
control on it. The webform, like most others in the site, subscribes to
a master page. I have determined that the button always renders with an
id of "ct100_ContentP laceHolder1_btn Continue" in both the IE and
Firefox browsers.

I created the following javascript code segment to disable it when the
page loads. I have reasons for not wanting to do this with server side
code...

document.all['ct100_ContentP laceHolder1_btn Continue'].disabled = true;

Now, when I view this in IE, the button is disabled. But when I view it
in Firefox, it's not. Also, there are no javascript errors returned by
either browser. Also, I have already updated my browserCaps section in
web.config, if that is relevant.

Why does the button remain enabled when viewing the page with Firefox?
Sep 20 '06 #5
Okay, I changed it to...

document.getEle mentById('ct100 _ContentPlaceHo lder1_btnContin ue').disabled=t rue

Now it still works fine in IE, and it still doesn't work in Firefox.

Any other ideas, anyone?
bruce barker (sqlwork.com) wrote:
document.all is an IE only collection, it does not exist in the w3c
standard, so it works in ie only. use the w3c standard:

document.getEle mentById('ct100 _ContentPlaceHo lder1_btnContin ue').disabled =
true;

-- bruce (sqlwork.com)

"Joey" <jo*********@to pscene.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ h48g2000cwc.goo glegroups.com.. .
Hello,

In my C# asp.net 2.0 application, I have a webform with a button server
control on it. The webform, like most others in the site, subscribes to
a master page. I have determined that the button always renders with an
id of "ct100_ContentP laceHolder1_btn Continue" in both the IE and
Firefox browsers.

I created the following javascript code segment to disable it when the
page loads. I have reasons for not wanting to do this with server side
code...

document.all['ct100_ContentP laceHolder1_btn Continue'].disabled = true;

Now, when I view this in IE, the button is disabled. But when I view it
in Firefox, it's not. Also, there are no javascript errors returned by
either browser. Also, I have already updated my browserCaps section in
web.config, if that is relevant.

Why does the button remain enabled when viewing the page with Firefox?
Sep 20 '06 #6
Okay, nevermind. I cleared the cache in Firefox, and now it works.
Thanks a lot!
Joey wrote:
Okay, I changed it to...

document.getEle mentById('ct100 _ContentPlaceHo lder1_btnContin ue').disabled=t rue

Now it still works fine in IE, and it still doesn't work in Firefox.

Any other ideas, anyone?
bruce barker (sqlwork.com) wrote:
document.all is an IE only collection, it does not exist in the w3c
standard, so it works in ie only. use the w3c standard:

document.getEle mentById('ct100 _ContentPlaceHo lder1_btnContin ue').disabled =
true;

-- bruce (sqlwork.com)

"Joey" <jo*********@to pscene.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ h48g2000cwc.goo glegroups.com.. .
Hello,
>
In my C# asp.net 2.0 application, I have a webform with a button server
control on it. The webform, like most others in the site, subscribes to
a master page. I have determined that the button always renders with an
id of "ct100_ContentP laceHolder1_btn Continue" in both the IE and
Firefox browsers.
>
I created the following javascript code segment to disable it when the
page loads. I have reasons for not wanting to do this with server side
code...
>
document.all['ct100_ContentP laceHolder1_btn Continue'].disabled = true;
>
Now, when I view this in IE, the button is disabled. But when I view it
in Firefox, it's not. Also, there are no javascript errors returned by
either browser. Also, I have already updated my browserCaps section in
web.config, if that is relevant.
>
Why does the button remain enabled when viewing the page with Firefox?
>
Sep 20 '06 #7
"Joey" <jo*********@to pscene.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ h48g2000cwc.goo glegroups.com.. .
Okay, nevermind. I cleared the cache in Firefox, and now it works.
BTW, you could make your HTML more readable by giving your MasterPage(s) and
ContentPages meaningful IDs... E.g. in the code behind your MasterPage:

protected void Page_Init(objec t sender, EventArgs e)
{
this.ID = "MyMasterPa ge";
}

And then explicitly name every ContentPage in its HTML e.g.

<asp:Content ContentPlaceHol derID="MyConten tPage" runat="server">
<asp:TextBox ID="MyTextBox" runat="server" />
</<asp:Content>

Then, client side, your control will ALWAYS be called
MyMasterPage_My ContentPage_MyT extBox- this makes your life massively easier
because it means you don't have to ask ASP.NET to tell you the controls'IDs,
as you already know them.

In this way, you can use client-side JavaScript to refer to your controls in
two ways:

document.aspnet Form.MyMasterPa ge_MyContentPag e_MyTextBox

or

document.getEle mentById('MyMas terPage_MyConte ntPage_MyTextBo x')

Also, don't forget that no matter what ID you give the <formtag in your
MasterPage, ASP.NET will ALWAYS rename it to aspnetForm :-)
Sep 20 '06 #8
Forget that , use inline aspx code to pass the control's .ClientID property.
This is the most reliable.
"Mark Rae" <ma**@markNOSPA Mrae.comschreef in bericht
news:e4******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP04.phx.gbl...
"Joey" <jo*********@to pscene.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ h48g2000cwc.goo glegroups.com.. .
>Okay, nevermind. I cleared the cache in Firefox, and now it works.

BTW, you could make your HTML more readable by giving your MasterPage(s)
and ContentPages meaningful IDs... E.g. in the code behind your
MasterPage:

protected void Page_Init(objec t sender, EventArgs e)
{
this.ID = "MyMasterPa ge";
}

And then explicitly name every ContentPage in its HTML e.g.

<asp:Content ContentPlaceHol derID="MyConten tPage" runat="server">
<asp:TextBox ID="MyTextBox" runat="server" />
</<asp:Content>

Then, client side, your control will ALWAYS be called
MyMasterPage_My ContentPage_MyT extBox- this makes your life massively
easier because it means you don't have to ask ASP.NET to tell you the
controls'IDs, as you already know them.

In this way, you can use client-side JavaScript to refer to your controls
in two ways:

document.aspnet Form.MyMasterPa ge_MyContentPag e_MyTextBox

or

document.getEle mentById('MyMas terPage_MyConte ntPage_MyTextBo x')

Also, don't forget that no matter what ID you give the <formtag in your
MasterPage, ASP.NET will ALWAYS rename it to aspnetForm :-)

Sep 21 '06 #9
I agree. You never know what the hiearchy will be when your pages and
controls are used. Hard-coding the names in Javascript will ensure
they break sooner or later.

What I normally do is declare Javascript variables in a static .js file
with the major of the Javascript behavior. And then with the ASP.NET
controls, I insert script blocks which set those variables.

<script ...>
var buttonId;

functions...
</script>

<!-- later from the ASP.NET control -->

<script ...>
buttonId = 'Page_Button1';
</script>

Search for RegisterScriptB lock on MSDN.

Brennan Stehling
http://brennan.offwhite.net/blog/

Edwin Knoppert wrote:
Forget that , use inline aspx code to pass the control's .ClientID property.
This is the most reliable.
"Mark Rae" <ma**@markNOSPA Mrae.comschreef in bericht
news:e4******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP04.phx.gbl...
"Joey" <jo*********@to pscene.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ h48g2000cwc.goo glegroups.com.. .
Okay, nevermind. I cleared the cache in Firefox, and now it works.
BTW, you could make your HTML more readable by giving your MasterPage(s)
and ContentPages meaningful IDs... E.g. in the code behind your
MasterPage:

protected void Page_Init(objec t sender, EventArgs e)
{
this.ID = "MyMasterPa ge";
}

And then explicitly name every ContentPage in its HTML e.g.

<asp:Content ContentPlaceHol derID="MyConten tPage" runat="server">
<asp:TextBox ID="MyTextBox" runat="server" />
</<asp:Content>

Then, client side, your control will ALWAYS be called
MyMasterPage_My ContentPage_MyT extBox- this makes your life massively
easier because it means you don't have to ask ASP.NET to tell you the
controls'IDs, as you already know them.

In this way, you can use client-side JavaScript to refer to your controls
in two ways:

document.aspnet Form.MyMasterPa ge_MyContentPag e_MyTextBox

or

document.getEle mentById('MyMas terPage_MyConte ntPage_MyTextBo x')

Also, don't forget that no matter what ID you give the <formtag in your
MasterPage, ASP.NET will ALWAYS rename it to aspnetForm :-)
Sep 21 '06 #10

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

6
3171
by: nntp | last post by:
I have a set of links which I want search engines to crawl them, but I want to disable them from my visitors, so I will ask the link owners to pay me to let me enable them. <a disabled href="#">bahbahbah</a> Does not work, as it is still clickable. It only changes the color to grey.
2
13278
by: techfuzz | last post by:
I scoured this group and others looking for the best way to disable a button after the first click to prevent multiple submissions, but never did find anything that worked like they said it would. I went ahead and wrote my own bit of code so I'm sharing it here for everyone. Even though it doesn't really disable the button by greying it out, it prevents the multiple submissions which it what I was attempting to prevent all along. ...
14
7196
by: Sinity | last post by:
Anyone knows the method/codes to disable the clicked button after first click by using .aspx-- to prevent people to click many time when waiting for the server response. I tried to do this by adding a java script for the button. But, useless.. Please help! Thank you
6
9078
by: Al Cohen | last post by:
I'm using a LinkButton to call some code, then do a redirect. The code does some queries, sends some emails, and takes a few moments before the redirect is performed. I'd like to disable my LinkButton during this period to prevent multiple submissions. (Obviously) the disabling should be done at the client side to prevent any delay. I've tried adding some javascript to LinkButton.Attributes: LinkButton1.Attributes.Add("onclick",...
6
4053
by: GD | last post by:
Hi, I wonder how to disable the "submit" behavior of a button. What I want is to assign values to dynamically added user controls without page postback. Problem: dynamically created control can not be accessed because the button click trigers page postback(see sample code). When the button is clicked, an error occurs: "System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object." Please help. Thanks.
3
3172
by: Jeff | last post by:
I have a payment form with a submit button. A large percentage of users double-click the submit button thus submitting their payment information twice. I would like to use javascript to disable the submit button once it's been clicked, yet still have the form submit. I can do this in ASP 2.0, however, ASP.Net seems to be adversely affected if you disable the submit button. Here's how I have it set up... The submit button is a...
0
3367
by: Robert Ladd | last post by:
Hi, I'm trying to disable the asp.net calendar control from a javascript function, but it doesn't disable the doPostBack. To simplify the situation, assume a page with 4 controls. A dropdownlist, a calendar control, a textbox and an update button. What I'm doing is initially setting the button to disabled, the other 3 controls are enabled. If any data is entered in the textbox, I want to disable the dropdownlist and the calendar...
2
2063
by: blarfoc | last post by:
Hi, I have to disable a button on a aspx page after the user clicks it. I have to disable the button with javascript because the process takes 20 seconds to run the full course. I kno I need to do this with javascript but I do not kno how. Please tell me if you will please.
4
18662
by: Patrick Flaherty | last post by:
Hi, Experienced programmer but new to PHP. Moreover I'm to use PHP with Xoops on top (this adds object orientation?). I don't seem to find a xoops Usenet group? Whatever the case (and presumably a Xoops property): how does one disable (grey-out) a button?
8
3731
by: FAQ server | last post by:
----------------------------------------------------------------------- FAQ Topic - How do I disable the right mouse button? ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The oncontextmenu intrinsic event is the only safe and reliable method. Of the other approaches often presented, most depend on an alert box interrupting the process and rarely work. Note that oncontextmenu is a non-standard event and is not...
0
9566
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it. First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
0
10317
jinu1996
by: jinu1996 | last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth. The Art of Business Website Design Your website is...
1
10300
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
0
9127
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own.... Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
1
7607
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM). In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules. He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms. Adolph will...
0
6844
by: conductexam | last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one. At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image. Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
1
4277
by: 6302768590 | last post by:
Hai team i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
2
3802
muto222
by: muto222 | last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
3
2974
bsmnconsultancy
by: bsmnconsultancy | last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.