Peter Bromberg has an interesting article eggheadcafe discussing AJAX
libraries. He prefers ANTHEM.NET over AJAX.NET because it doesn't break the
stateful page model. Our developers are currently using AJAX.NET after
extensive research because ATLAS is currently not ready for prime-time and
much more verbose than AJAX.NET.
I was looking at some "Hello World" status on various libraies and ATLAS
does, indeed, result in much more traffic.
The total traffic in bytes was:
ASP.NET 2.0 without AJAX -- 3,470
AJAX.NET Pro -- 15,536
ATLAS -- 181,850
ANTHEM.NET -- 15,618
It appears that ANTHEM is competitive with AJAX.NET and likewise has the
advantage of not breaking the stateful Page model.
I am wondering what others think about this? Should we continue with
AJAX.NET, switch to ANTHEM.NET... or wait for ATLAS?
7  1502 
Atlas is planned to be part of the next version of Visual Studio.
Therefore, if you learn another AJAX framework, you're probably just going
to need to learn Atlas anyway when the next version of Visual Studio comes
out.
--
I hope this helps,
Steve C. Orr, MCSD, MVP http://SteveOrr.net
"Thirsty Traveler" <nf*@nospam.com > wrote in message
news:uF******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P02.phx.gbl... Peter Bromberg has an interesting article eggheadcafe discussing AJAX
libraries. He prefers ANTHEM.NET over AJAX.NET because it doesn't break
the stateful page model. Our developers are currently using AJAX.NET after
extensive research because ATLAS is currently not ready for prime-time and
much more verbose than AJAX.NET.
I was looking at some "Hello World" status on various libraies and ATLAS
does, indeed, result in much more traffic.
The total traffic in bytes was:
ASP.NET 2.0 without AJAX -- 3,470
AJAX.NET Pro -- 15,536
ATLAS -- 181,850
ANTHEM.NET -- 15,618
It appears that ANTHEM is competitive with AJAX.NET and likewise has the
advantage of not breaking the stateful Page model.
I am wondering what others think about this? Should we continue with
AJAX.NET, switch to ANTHEM.NET... or wait for ATLAS?
I've used AJAX.NET and then switched to ANTHEM.
My opinion, Anthem is a lot better as object model and asp.net integration.
It seems either stable and.. it works. With Ajax.net I had many problem on
production environment. And Anthem is open source.
Atlas I think is too young.
Your test is good, however I think it can be better a test with a "real
page". A page with a large html source, so we can see how using AJAX can
reduce network traffic. I hope that in this scenario ASP.NET without AJAX
requires more bytes that an AJAX solution for a round trip to server..
"Thirsty Traveler" <nf*@nospam.com > wrote in message
news:uF******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P02.phx.gbl... Peter Bromberg has an interesting article eggheadcafe discussing AJAX
libraries. He prefers ANTHEM.NET over AJAX.NET because it doesn't break
the stateful page model. Our developers are currently using AJAX.NET after
extensive research because ATLAS is currently not ready for prime-time and
much more verbose than AJAX.NET.
I was looking at some "Hello World" status on various libraies and ATLAS
does, indeed, result in much more traffic.
The total traffic in bytes was:
ASP.NET 2.0 without AJAX -- 3,470
AJAX.NET Pro -- 15,536
ATLAS -- 181,850
ANTHEM.NET -- 15,618
It appears that ANTHEM is competitive with AJAX.NET and likewise has the
advantage of not breaking the stateful Page model.
I am wondering what others think about this? Should we continue with
AJAX.NET, switch to ANTHEM.NET... or wait for ATLAS?
Thing is though, with anthem, you don't realy have to learn anything. Sure
there are a few more properties and stuff with the anthem controls, but they
are just ASP.net controls with a few extra properties and methods. You can
pretty much start using them straight away.
"Steve C. Orr [MVP, MCSD]" wrote: Atlas is planned to be part of the next version of Visual Studio.
Therefore, if you learn another AJAX framework, you're probably just going
to need to learn Atlas anyway when the next version of Visual Studio comes
out.
--
I hope this helps,
Steve C. Orr, MCSD, MVP
http://SteveOrr.net
"Thirsty Traveler" <nf*@nospam.com > wrote in message
news:uF******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P02.phx.gbl... Peter Bromberg has an interesting article eggheadcafe discussing AJAX
libraries. He prefers ANTHEM.NET over AJAX.NET because it doesn't break
the stateful page model. Our developers are currently using AJAX.NET after
extensive research because ATLAS is currently not ready for prime-time and
much more verbose than AJAX.NET.
I was looking at some "Hello World" status on various libraies and ATLAS
does, indeed, result in much more traffic.
The total traffic in bytes was:
ASP.NET 2.0 without AJAX -- 3,470
AJAX.NET Pro -- 15,536
ATLAS -- 181,850
ANTHEM.NET -- 15,618
It appears that ANTHEM is competitive with AJAX.NET and likewise has the
advantage of not breaking the stateful Page model.
I am wondering what others think about this? Should we continue with
AJAX.NET, switch to ANTHEM.NET... or wait for ATLAS?
http://www.daniel-zeiss.de/AJAXComparison/Results.htm
This is the comparison.
Just wanted to point out that the 99% of traffic for Atlas are static
scripts that loaded only once for the client. All other traffic less or on
the same level as ANTHEM.NET or AJAX.NET. See the charts on the bottom of
the article.
Thanks.
"Thirsty Traveler" <nf*@nospam.com > wrote in message
news:uF******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P02.phx.gbl... Peter Bromberg has an interesting article eggheadcafe discussing AJAX
libraries. He prefers ANTHEM.NET over AJAX.NET because it doesn't break
the stateful page model. Our developers are currently using AJAX.NET after
extensive research because ATLAS is currently not ready for prime-time and
much more verbose than AJAX.NET.
I was looking at some "Hello World" status on various libraies and ATLAS
does, indeed, result in much more traffic.
The total traffic in bytes was:
ASP.NET 2.0 without AJAX -- 3,470
AJAX.NET Pro -- 15,536
ATLAS -- 181,850
ANTHEM.NET -- 15,618
It appears that ANTHEM is competitive with AJAX.NET and likewise has the
advantage of not breaking the stateful Page model.
I am wondering what others think about this? Should we continue with
AJAX.NET, switch to ANTHEM.NET... or wait for ATLAS?
Thus wrote Trapulo, I've used AJAX.NET and then switched to ANTHEM.
My opinion, Anthem is a lot better as object model and asp.net
integration. It seems either stable and.. it works. With Ajax.net I
had many problem on production environment. And Anthem is open source.
Atlas I think is too young.
Well, it's old enough to come with a go-live license ;-)
--
Joerg Jooss ne********@joer gjooss.de
Well it looks like you broke the bench mark agreements on everything. Can't
you read or don't you care.
"Thirsty Traveler" wrote: Peter Bromberg has an interesting article eggheadcafe discussing AJAX
libraries. He prefers ANTHEM.NET over AJAX.NET because it doesn't break the
stateful page model. Our developers are currently using AJAX.NET after
extensive research because ATLAS is currently not ready for prime-time and
much more verbose than AJAX.NET.
I was looking at some "Hello World" status on various libraies and ATLAS
does, indeed, result in much more traffic.
The total traffic in bytes was:
ASP.NET 2.0 without AJAX -- 3,470
AJAX.NET Pro -- 15,536
ATLAS -- 181,850
ANTHEM.NET -- 15,618
It appears that ANTHEM is competitive with AJAX.NET and likewise has the
advantage of not breaking the stateful Page model.
I am wondering what others think about this? Should we continue with
AJAX.NET, switch to ANTHEM.NET... or wait for ATLAS?
Have a nice day.
"DWS" <DW*@discussion s.microsoft.com > wrote in message
news:06******** *************** ***********@mic rosoft.com... Well it looks like you broke the bench mark agreements on everything.
Can't
you read or don't you care.
"Thirsty Traveler" wrote:
Peter Bromberg has an interesting article eggheadcafe discussing AJAX
libraries. He prefers ANTHEM.NET over AJAX.NET because it doesn't break
the
stateful page model. Our developers are currently using AJAX.NET after
extensive research because ATLAS is currently not ready for prime-time
and
much more verbose than AJAX.NET.
I was looking at some "Hello World" status on various libraies and ATLAS
does, indeed, result in much more traffic.
The total traffic in bytes was:
ASP.NET 2.0 without AJAX -- 3,470
AJAX.NET Pro -- 15,536
ATLAS -- 181,850
ANTHEM.NET -- 15,618
It appears that ANTHEM is competitive with AJAX.NET and likewise has the
advantage of not breaking the stateful Page model.
I am wondering what others think about this? Should we continue with
AJAX.NET, switch to ANTHEM.NET... or wait for ATLAS?
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics | |
by: Peter Rilling |
last post by:
I would like the opinions of those who actually use Ajax libraries and maybe
tried various APIs before settling on the one you currently use. I would
like to know what libraries (that are free) would people recommend using for
a site.
|
by: darrel |
last post by:
I've been playing with prototype.js and scriptaculous to create some nice
drag-and-drop interaction on my applications GUI. That's working well.
Now I want to take the next step and start passing data back and forth
between my page and the server via AJAX.
In terms of .net, can someone give me the overall concept?
Normally, I'd have a function in my codebehind that grabs a dataset and then
binds that to a control on my aspx page.
|
by: Tony |
last post by:
I just noticed that prototype.js is one of the files in the Ajax.NET
distribution - I'm pretty concerned about this. Does anyone know if this
is the same "prototype.js" that is not well-liked around here?
If so, do you know if Ajax.NET can be used without prototype.js?
--
"The most convoluted explanation that fits all of the made-up facts is
the most likely to be believed by conspiracy theorists. Fitting the
|
by: geekboy0001 |
last post by:
Just trying to get some opinions out there...
There are tons of Ajax libraries out there... Ajax.NET Professional,
ComfortASP.NET, ZumiPage, etc. etc... Microsoft has their own too,
Atlas. I've been looking at these and certainly there needs to be a
solution that's integrated with MS.NET, easy to use, and well supported
to production environments. That's why I ask -- can there ever
possibly be a real (free or paid) competitor to...
|
by: caston |
last post by:
Well, everybody can now agree with the fact that the Ajax hype is over.
Still multiple Ajax Frameworks are flourishing, aren't they?
So, last night I questioned myself with the following: "When Ajax
Frameworks will be gone? What is required to get rid of them and start
using browsers?" (To be more precise, I should probably also mention
what kind of frameworks do i mean. These are: Dojo, BackBase, Qooxdoo
etc.)
I've got an answer that I...
| | |
by: paladin.rithe |
last post by:
I was looking at libraries for my project, and was thinking about using
Prototype, but I was seeing that people have reservations about it.
All I really need is some basic Ajax stuff, the basic XMLHttpRequest
stuff. I will probably add on to that with my own stuff as I need it.
I've seen one called advAjax, but the documentation is about as bad as
Prototype IMHO. I was having trouble figuring it out.
Are there other basic libraries that...
|
by: PythonistL |
last post by:
Can you please recommend a good books about Ajax ?
Thank you
L
|
by: George |
last post by:
I am doing an AJAX call using JQuery on my page to which returns
JSON objects and everything works fine.
Now I decided to use ashx handler instead of and simply write
JSON out. Then my problems begun.
So here is JQuery call
$.ajax({
type: 'POST',
url: url,
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
| | |
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
|
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| |
