CSS, HTML, ASP.NET - performance??

[Ivan Demkovitch]

Hi!

I wonder if I get any performance hit when I do following with some of my
user controls:

I don't have HTML section, but instead, I use code like;
this.Controls.A dd(new LiteralControl( "<div id=\"MdlHd\">" + article.Title +
"</div>"));

to populate HTML.

This gives me flexibility for using CSS and I can target different browsers.
I also save a lot of network traffic.

Am I doing right thing or it is a bad practice?

[Kevin Spencer]

Hi Ivan,

I've been stuggling with the same thing. Apparently you want to use the ID
of the Control for your CSS. Because ASP.Net renames client-side IDs, you
want to preserve the ID. However, this makes maintaining the app much more
difficult, effectively eliminating the advantage of using a Template. I'm
thinking more along the lines of using CSS classes, which don't get renamed.
I think it would be great if MS came up with a "Dynamic StyleSheet" which
would translate the IDs per page.

--
HTH,
Kevin Spencer
..Net Developer
Microsoft MVP
Big things are made up
of lots of little things.

"Ivan Demkovitch" <i@a.b> wrote in message
news:uR******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP12.phx.gbl...

Hi!

I wonder if I get any performance hit when I do following with some of my
user controls:

I don't have HTML section, but instead, I use code like;
this.Controls.A dd(new LiteralControl( "<div id=\"MdlHd\">" + article.Title + "</div>"));

to populate HTML.

This gives me flexibility for using CSS and I can target different browsers. I also save a lot of network traffic.

Am I doing right thing or it is a bad practice?

[Charlie Nilsson [MSFT]]

Hmm... you are essentially creating an Object, when all you want to do is
add text to your html output. This is bad.
Creating objects is expensive, though you may find the flexibility you're
getting from it very worth it. If you only have 10 users to this site, and
it can keep up, why not? If you want scalability, you are heading in the
wrong direction.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
This reply is provided AS IS, without warranty (express or implied).
--------------------

From: "Ivan Demkovitch" <i@a.b>
Subject: CSS, HTML, ASP.NET - performance??
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:52:21 -0600
Lines: 19
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: <uR************ **@TK2MSFTNGP12 .phx.gbl>
Newsgroups: microsoft.publi c.dotnet.framew ork.aspnet
NNTP-Posting-Host: host230-178.discord.bir ch.net 65.16.230.178
Path: cpmsftngxa07.ph x.gbl!cpmsftngx a06.phx.gbl!cpm sftngxa09.phx.g bl!TK2MSFTNGP08 .
phx.gbl!TK2MSFT NGP12.phx.gblXref: cpmsftngxa07.ph x.gbl microsoft.publi c.dotnet.framew ork.aspnet:2061 62
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.publi c.dotnet.framew ork.aspnet

Hi!

I wonder if I get any performance hit when I do following with some of my
user controls:

I don't have HTML section, but instead, I use code like;
this.Controls. Add(new LiteralControl( "<div id=\"MdlHd\">" + article.Title +
"</div>"));

to populate HTML.

This gives me flexibility for using CSS and I can target different browsers.I also save a lot of network traffic.

Am I doing right thing or it is a bad practice?

[Ivan Demkovitch]

Thanks everyone for replys!

I understand issues with handling events and ID's

But I think I head in right direction. I don't use this approach for
everything.
But some "blocks" - or user controls in my page don't need flexibility.
Those are that display only and don't need user
interaction, but do need dynamic content.

Some times it's just a text or a hyperlinks. And I found it to be a big
savings to not have Labels
because of this <span> tags.
Especially for DataLists, even not making it table, it will include <Span>
for each item.

As far as CSS - I think it works ok for me. Instead of panels I use <DIV>
with runat =server and their ID's fine.
I use it for main page layout..

"Kevin Spencer" <ke***@takempis .com> wrote in message
news:ux******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP09.phx.gbl...

Hi Ivan,

I've been stuggling with the same thing. Apparently you want to use the ID
of the Control for your CSS. Because ASP.Net renames client-side IDs, you
want to preserve the ID. However, this makes maintaining the app much more
difficult, effectively eliminating the advantage of using a Template. I'm
thinking more along the lines of using CSS classes, which don't get renamed. I think it would be great if MS came up with a "Dynamic StyleSheet" which
would translate the IDs per page.

--
HTH,
Kevin Spencer
.Net Developer
Microsoft MVP
Big things are made up
of lots of little things.

"Ivan Demkovitch" <i@a.b> wrote in message
news:uR******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP12.phx.gbl...

Hi!

I wonder if I get any performance hit when I do following with some of my user controls:

I don't have HTML section, but instead, I use code like;
this.Controls.A dd(new LiteralControl( "<div id=\"MdlHd\">" +

article.Title +

"</div>"));

to populate HTML.

This gives me flexibility for using CSS and I can target different

browsers.

I also save a lot of network traffic.

Am I doing right thing or it is a bad practice?

[Charlie Nilsson [MSFT]]

Looks good...

--
CharlieN
VSU

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

Note: For the benefit of the community-at-large, all responses to this
message are best directed to the newsgroup/thread from which they
originated.
--------------------

From: "Ivan Demkovitch" <i@a.b>
References: <uR************ **@TK2MSFTNGP12 .phx.gbl> <ux************ **@TK2MSFTNGP09 .phx.gbl> Subject: Re: CSS, HTML, ASP.NET - performance??
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 13:08:11 -0600
Lines: 72
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: <ez************ **@TK2MSFTNGP09 .phx.gbl>
Newsgroups: microsoft.publi c.dotnet.framew ork.aspnet
NNTP-Posting-Host: host230-178.discord.bir ch.net 65.16.230.178
Path: cpmsftngxa07.ph x.gbl!cpmsftngx a06.phx.gbl!cpm sftngxa10.phx.g bl!TK2MSFTNGXA0 5
.phx.gbl!TK2MSF TNGP08.phx.gbl! TK2MSFTNGP09.ph x.gbl Xref: cpmsftngxa07.ph x.gbl microsoft.publi c.dotnet.framew ork.aspnet:2061 91
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.publi c.dotnet.framew ork.aspnet

Thanks everyone for replys!

I understand issues with handling events and ID's

But I think I head in right direction. I don't use this approach for
everything.
But some "blocks" - or user controls in my page don't need flexibility.
Those are that display only and don't need user
interaction, but do need dynamic content.

Some times it's just a text or a hyperlinks. And I found it to be a big
savings to not have Labels
because of this <span> tags.
Especially for DataLists, even not making it table, it will include <Span>
for each item.

As far as CSS - I think it works ok for me. Instead of panels I use <DIV>
with runat =server and their ID's fine.
I use it for main page layout..

"Kevin Spencer" <ke***@takempis .com> wrote in message
news:ux******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP09.phx.gbl...

Hi Ivan,

I've been stuggling with the same thing. Apparently you want to use the ID

of the Control for your CSS. Because ASP.Net renames client-side IDs, you want to preserve the ID. However, this makes maintaining the app much more difficult, effectively eliminating the advantage of using a Template. I'm thinking more along the lines of using CSS classes, which don't get

renamed.

I think it would be great if MS came up with a "Dynamic StyleSheet" which would translate the IDs per page.

--
HTH,
Kevin Spencer
.Net Developer
Microsoft MVP
Big things are made up
of lots of little things.

"Ivan Demkovitch" <i@a.b> wrote in message
news:uR******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP12.phx.gbl...

Hi!

I wonder if I get any performance hit when I do following with some of

my user controls:

I don't have HTML section, but instead, I use code like;
this.Controls.A dd(new LiteralControl( "<div id=\"MdlHd\">" +

article.Title

+

"</div>"));

to populate HTML.

This gives me flexibility for using CSS and I can target different

browsers.

I also save a lot of network traffic.

Am I doing right thing or it is a bad practice?