I am using MS Office Access 2003 (11.5614). I have been running the
following query with good results. The query lets me enter the month
period and returns the SUM of the age fields.
SELECT [Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy] AS [Month/Year], SUM([0 to 18])
AS [Sum of 0 to 18], SUM([19 to 40]) AS [Sum of 19 to 40], SUM([41 to
65]) AS [Sum of 41 to 65], SUM([66 Plus]) AS [Sum of 66 Plus]
FROM [Lake Worth CFP Clients]
WHERE FORMAT([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy")=[Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy];
I now want to add an additional criteria of the city field. I added
the criteria with the SQL results
..
SELECT [Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy] AS [Month/Year], Sum([0 to 18])
AS [Sum of 0 to 18], Sum([19 to 40]) AS [Sum of 19 to 40], Sum([41 to
65]) AS [Sum of 41 to 65], Sum([66 Plus]) AS [Sum of 66 Plus]
FROM [Lake Worth CFP Clients]
WHERE (((Format([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy"))=[Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy])
AND (([Lake Worth CFP Clients].City)="Lake Worth"));
I get the following error message:
You tried to execute a query that does not include the specified
expression "city" as part of an aggregate function.
The conflict appears to be between the city criteria and the SUM of
the ages.
Can anyone give me some direction in this matter ? 11 1844
Stan <st*******@hotm ail.comwrote in
news:11******** **************@ y42g2000hsy.goo glegroups.com:
>
I am using MS Office Access 2003 (11.5614). I have been running
the following query with good results. The query lets me enter
the month period and returns the SUM of the age fields.
SELECT [Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy] AS [Month/Year], SUM([0 to
18]) AS [Sum of 0 to 18], SUM([19 to 40]) AS [Sum of 19 to 40],
SUM([41 to 65]) AS [Sum of 41 to 65], SUM([66 Plus]) AS [Sum of 66
Plus] FROM [Lake Worth CFP Clients]
WHERE FORMAT([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy")=[Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy];
I now want to add an additional criteria of the city field. I
added the criteria with the SQL results
.
SELECT [Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy] AS [Month/Year], Sum([0 to
18]) AS [Sum of 0 to 18], Sum([19 to 40]) AS [Sum of 19 to 40],
Sum([41 to 65]) AS [Sum of 41 to 65], Sum([66 Plus]) AS [Sum of 66
Plus] FROM [Lake Worth CFP Clients]
WHERE (((Format([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy"))=[Enter Month/Year as
mm/yyyy]) AND (([Lake Worth CFP Clients].City)="Lake Worth"));
I get the following error message:
You tried to execute a query that does not include the specified
expression "city" as part of an aggregate function.
The conflict appears to be between the city criteria and the SUM
of the ages.
Can anyone give me some direction in this matter ?
In a summary query, any field in the WHERE clause also has to be in
the SELECT clause. because the where is applied after the sum(),
average() etc... and if it's in the SELECT clause it has to be in a
function like sum(), first(), etc... or in the GROUP BY Clause
To get around this, there is a HAVING clause. which is applicable to
the records before the sum() is performed.Just change AND AND
(([Lake Worth... to HAVING AND (([Lake Worth C... and it should
work.
HTH
--
Bob Quintal
PA is y I've altered my email address.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Bob Quintal <rq******@sPAmp atico.cawrote in
news:Xn******** **************@ 66.150.105.47:
Stan <st*******@hotm ail.comwrote in
news:11******** **************@ y42g2000hsy.goo glegroups.com:
>> I am using MS Office Access 2003 (11.5614). I have been running the following query with good results. The query lets me enter the month period and returns the SUM of the age fields.
SELECT [Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy] AS [Month/Year], SUM([0 to 18]) AS [Sum of 0 to 18], SUM([19 to 40]) AS [Sum of 19 to 40], SUM([41 to 65]) AS [Sum of 41 to 65], SUM([66 Plus]) AS [Sum of 66 Plus] FROM [Lake Worth CFP Clients] WHERE FORMAT([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy")=[Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy];
I now want to add an additional criteria of the city field. I added the criteria with the SQL results . SELECT [Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy] AS [Month/Year], Sum([0 to 18]) AS [Sum of 0 to 18], Sum([19 to 40]) AS [Sum of 19 to 40], Sum([41 to 65]) AS [Sum of 41 to 65], Sum([66 Plus]) AS [Sum of 66 Plus] FROM [Lake Worth CFP Clients] WHERE (((Format([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy"))=[Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy]) AND (([Lake Worth CFP Clients].City)="Lake Worth"));
I get the following error message:
You tried to execute a query that does not include the specified expression "city" as part of an aggregate function.
The conflict appears to be between the city criteria and the SUM of the ages.
Can anyone give me some direction in this matter ?
In a summary query, any field in the WHERE clause also has to be
in the SELECT clause. because the where is applied after the
sum(), average() etc... and if it's in the SELECT clause it has to
be in a function like sum(), first(), etc... or in the GROUP BY
Clause
To get around this, there is a HAVING clause. which is applicable
to the records before the sum() is performed.Just change AND AND
(([Lake Worth... to HAVING AND (([Lake Worth C... and it should
work.
HTH
oops.
Just change AND (([Lake Worth... to
HAVING (([Lake Worth C... and it should work.
--
Bob Quintal
PA is y I've altered my email address.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
On Sep 29, 8:27 am, Bob Quintal <rquin...@sPAmp atico.cawrote:
Stan <stanha...@hotm ail.comwrote innews:11****** *************** *@y42g2000hsy.g ooglegroups.com :
I am using MS Office Access 2003 (11.5614). I have been running
the following query with good results. The query lets me enter
the month period and returns the SUM of the age fields.
SELECT [Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy] AS [Month/Year], SUM([0 to
18]) AS [Sum of 0 to 18], SUM([19 to 40]) AS [Sum of 19 to 40],
SUM([41 to 65]) AS [Sum of 41 to 65], SUM([66 Plus]) AS [Sum of 66
Plus] FROM [Lake Worth CFP Clients]
WHERE FORMAT([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy")=[Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy];
I now want to add an additional criteria of the city field. I
added the criteria with the SQL results
.
SELECT [Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy] AS [Month/Year], Sum([0 to
18]) AS [Sum of 0 to 18], Sum([19 to 40]) AS [Sum of 19 to 40],
Sum([41 to 65]) AS [Sum of 41 to 65], Sum([66 Plus]) AS [Sum of 66
Plus] FROM [Lake Worth CFP Clients]
WHERE (((Format([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy"))=[Enter Month/Year as
mm/yyyy]) AND (([Lake Worth CFP Clients].City)="Lake Worth"));
I get the following error message:
You tried to execute a query that does not include the specified
expression "city" as part of an aggregate function.
The conflict appears to be between the city criteria and the SUM
of the ages.
Can anyone give me some direction in this matter ?
In a summary query, any field in the WHERE clause also has to be in
the SELECT clause. because the where is applied after the sum(),
average() etc... and if it's in the SELECT clause it has to be in a
function like sum(), first(), etc... or in the GROUP BY Clause
To get around this, there is a HAVING clause. which is applicable to
the records before the sum() is performed.Just change AND AND
(([Lake Worth... to HAVING AND (([Lake Worth C... and it should
work.
HTH
--
Bob Quintal
PA is y I've altered my email address.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.co m
Bob,
I changed the query to the following:
SELECT [Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy] AS [Month/Year], Sum([0 to 18])
AS [Sum of 0 to 18], Sum([19 to 40]) AS [Sum of 19 to 40], Sum([41 to
65]) AS [Sum of 41 to 65], Sum([66 Plus]) AS [Sum of 66 Plus], [Lake
Worth CFP Clients].City
FROM [Lake Worth CFP Clients]
WHERE (((Format([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy"))=[Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy])
HAVING AND (([Lake Worth CFP Clients].City)="Lake Worth"));
I received the following error message:
syntax error (missing operator) in query
expression' (((Format([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy"))=[Enter Month/Year as mm/
yyyy]) HAVING AND (([Lake Worth CFP Clients].City)="Lake Worth"))'
IF I remove the HAVE the query runs OK.
Any other suggestions?
Thanks again,
Stan Hanna
Stan wrote:
On Sep 29, 8:27 am, Bob Quintal <rquin...@sPAmp atico.cawrote:
>>Stan <stanha...@hotm ail.comwrote innews:11****** *************** *@y42g2000hsy.g ooglegroups.com :
>>>I am using MS Office Access 2003 (11.5614). I have been running the following query with good results. The query lets me enter the month period and returns the SUM of the age fields.
>>>SELECT [Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy] AS [Month/Year], SUM([0 to 18]) AS [Sum of 0 to 18], SUM([19 to 40]) AS [Sum of 19 to 40], SUM([41 to 65]) AS [Sum of 41 to 65], SUM([66 Plus]) AS [Sum of 66 Plus] FROM [Lake Worth CFP Clients] WHERE FORMAT([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy")=[Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy];
>>>I now want to add an additional criteria of the city field. I added the criteria with the SQL results . SELECT [Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy] AS [Month/Year], Sum([0 to 18]) AS [Sum of 0 to 18], Sum([19 to 40]) AS [Sum of 19 to 40], Sum([41 to 65]) AS [Sum of 41 to 65], Sum([66 Plus]) AS [Sum of 66 Plus] FROM [Lake Worth CFP Clients] WHERE (((Format([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy"))=[Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy]) AND (([Lake Worth CFP Clients].City)="Lake Worth"));
>>>I get the following error message:
>>>You tried to execute a query that does not include the specified expression "city" as part of an aggregate function.
>>>The conflict appears to be between the city criteria and the SUM of the ages.
>>>Can anyone give me some direction in this matter ?
In a summary query, any field in the WHERE clause also has to be in the SELECT clause. because the where is applied after the sum(), average() etc... and if it's in the SELECT clause it has to be in a function like sum(), first(), etc... or in the GROUP BY Clause
To get around this, there is a HAVING clause. which is applicable to the records before the sum() is performed.Just change AND AND (([Lake Worth... to HAVING AND (([Lake Worth C... and it should work.
HTH -- Bob Quintal
PA is y I've altered my email address.
-- Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.co m
Bob,
I changed the query to the following:
SELECT [Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy] AS [Month/Year], Sum([0 to 18])
AS [Sum of 0 to 18], Sum([19 to 40]) AS [Sum of 19 to 40], Sum([41 to
65]) AS [Sum of 41 to 65], Sum([66 Plus]) AS [Sum of 66 Plus], [Lake
Worth CFP Clients].City
FROM [Lake Worth CFP Clients]
WHERE (((Format([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy"))=[Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy])
HAVING AND (([Lake Worth CFP Clients].City)="Lake Worth"));
I received the following error message:
syntax error (missing operator) in query
expression' (((Format([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy"))=[Enter Month/Year as mm/
yyyy]) HAVING AND (([Lake Worth CFP Clients].City)="Lake Worth"))'
IF I remove the HAVE the query runs OK.
Any other suggestions?
Thanks again,
Stan Hanna
What is Having AND? What are you ANDing?
Stan wrote:
On Sep 29, 8:27 am, Bob Quintal <rquin...@sPAmp atico.cawrote:
>>Stan <stanha...@hotm ail.comwrote innews:11****** *************** *@y42g2000hsy.g ooglegroups.com :
>>>I am using MS Office Access 2003 (11.5614). I have been running the following query with good results. The query lets me enter the month period and returns the SUM of the age fields.
>>>SELECT [Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy] AS [Month/Year], SUM([0 to 18]) AS [Sum of 0 to 18], SUM([19 to 40]) AS [Sum of 19 to 40], SUM([41 to 65]) AS [Sum of 41 to 65], SUM([66 Plus]) AS [Sum of 66 Plus] FROM [Lake Worth CFP Clients] WHERE FORMAT([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy")=[Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy];
>>>I now want to add an additional criteria of the city field. I added the criteria with the SQL results . SELECT [Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy] AS [Month/Year], Sum([0 to 18]) AS [Sum of 0 to 18], Sum([19 to 40]) AS [Sum of 19 to 40], Sum([41 to 65]) AS [Sum of 41 to 65], Sum([66 Plus]) AS [Sum of 66 Plus] FROM [Lake Worth CFP Clients] WHERE (((Format([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy"))=[Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy]) AND (([Lake Worth CFP Clients].City)="Lake Worth"));
>>>I get the following error message:
>>>You tried to execute a query that does not include the specified expression "city" as part of an aggregate function.
>>>The conflict appears to be between the city criteria and the SUM of the ages.
>>>Can anyone give me some direction in this matter ?
In a summary query, any field in the WHERE clause also has to be in the SELECT clause. because the where is applied after the sum(), average() etc... and if it's in the SELECT clause it has to be in a function like sum(), first(), etc... or in the GROUP BY Clause
To get around this, there is a HAVING clause. which is applicable to the records before the sum() is performed.Just change AND AND (([Lake Worth... to HAVING AND (([Lake Worth C... and it should work.
HTH -- Bob Quintal
PA is y I've altered my email address.
-- Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.co m
Bob,
I changed the query to the following:
SELECT [Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy] AS [Month/Year], Sum([0 to 18])
AS [Sum of 0 to 18], Sum([19 to 40]) AS [Sum of 19 to 40], Sum([41 to
65]) AS [Sum of 41 to 65], Sum([66 Plus]) AS [Sum of 66 Plus], [Lake
Worth CFP Clients].City
FROM [Lake Worth CFP Clients]
WHERE (((Format([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy"))=[Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy])
HAVING AND (([Lake Worth CFP Clients].City)="Lake Worth"));
I received the following error message:
syntax error (missing operator) in query
expression' (((Format([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy"))=[Enter Month/Year as mm/
yyyy]) HAVING AND (([Lake Worth CFP Clients].City)="Lake Worth"))'
IF I remove the HAVE the query runs OK.
Any other suggestions?
Thanks again,
Stan Hanna
SOmetimes it is best to create your SQL statement (with bugs) and enter
Debug.Print strSQL
or whatever the variable is. Then copy/Paste that statement from the
Debug/Immediate window into the querybuilder (View/SQL) and attempt to
run or design.
Stan <st*******@hotm ail.comwrote in
news:11******** **************@ g4g2000hsf.goog legroups.com:
On Sep 29, 8:27 am, Bob Quintal <rquin...@sPAmp atico.cawrote:
>Stan <stanha...@hotm ail.comwrote innews:11***** *************** **@y42g2000hsy. googlegroups.co m:
I am using MS Office Access 2003 (11.5614). I have been
running the following query with good results. The query lets
me enter the month period and returns the SUM of the age
fields.
SELECT [Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy] AS [Month/Year], SUM([0 to
18]) AS [Sum of 0 to 18], SUM([19 to 40]) AS [Sum of 19 to 40],
SUM([41 to 65]) AS [Sum of 41 to 65], SUM([66 Plus]) AS [Sum of
66 Plus] FROM [Lake Worth CFP Clients]
WHERE FORMAT([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy")=[Enter Month/Year as
mm/yyyy];
I now want to add an additional criteria of the city field. I
added the criteria with the SQL results
.
SELECT [Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy] AS [Month/Year], Sum([0 to
18]) AS [Sum of 0 to 18], Sum([19 to 40]) AS [Sum of 19 to 40],
Sum([41 to 65]) AS [Sum of 41 to 65], Sum([66 Plus]) AS [Sum of
66 Plus] FROM [Lake Worth CFP Clients]
WHERE (((Format([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy"))=[Enter Month/Year as
mm/yyyy]) AND (([Lake Worth CFP Clients].City)="Lake Worth"));
I get the following error message:
You tried to execute a query that does not include the
specified expression "city" as part of an aggregate function.
The conflict appears to be between the city criteria and the
SUM of the ages.
Can anyone give me some direction in this matter ?
In a summary query, any field in the WHERE clause also has to be in the SELECT clause. because the where is applied after the sum(), average() etc... and if it's in the SELECT clause it has to be in a function like sum(), first(), etc... or in the GROUP BY Clause
To get around this, there is a HAVING clause. which is applicable to the records before the sum() is performed.Just change AND AND (([Lake Worth... to HAVING AND (([Lake Worth C... and it should work.
HTH -- Bob Quintal
PA is y I've altered my email address.
-- Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.co m
Bob,
I changed the query to the following:
SELECT [Enter Month/Year as mm/yyyy] AS [Month/Year], Sum([0 to
18]) AS [Sum of 0 to 18], Sum([19 to 40]) AS [Sum of 19 to 40],
Sum([41 to 65]) AS [Sum of 41 to 65], Sum([66 Plus]) AS [Sum of 66
Plus], [Lake Worth CFP Clients].City
FROM [Lake Worth CFP Clients]
WHERE (((Format([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy"))=[Enter Month/Year as
mm/yyyy]) HAVING AND (([Lake Worth CFP Clients].City)="Lake
Worth"));
I received the following error message:
syntax error (missing operator) in query
expression' (((Format([SvcDate 1],"mm/yyyy"))=[Enter Month/Year as
mm/ yyyy]) HAVING AND (([Lake Worth CFP Clients].City)="Lake
Worth"))'
IF I remove the HAVE the query runs OK.
Any other suggestions?
Thanks again,
Stan Hanna
Sorry, when I copied, pasted and modified, I failed to remove the
AND that I was replacing with HAVING.
HAVING (([Lake W ...
not HAVING AND (([Lake W...
--
Bob Quintal
PA is y I've altered my email address.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
uBob Quintal <rq******@sPAmp atico.cawrote in
news:Xn******** **************@ 66.150.105.47:
In a summary query, any field in the WHERE clause also has to be
in the SELECT clause. because the where is applied after the
sum(), average() etc... and if it's in the SELECT clause it has to
be in a function like sum(), first(), etc... or in the GROUP BY
Clause
To get around this, there is a HAVING clause. which is applicable
to the records before the sum() is performed.Just change AND AND
(([Lake Worth... to HAVING AND (([Lake Worth C... and it should
work.
This is wrong.
However, I'll admit, it was something *I* didn't know until the last
cople of years. Here is some perfectly valoid SQL:
SELECT MyTable.Created , Count(MyTable.I nventoryID) AS Count
FROM
MyTable
WHERE MyTable.Updated By="MWB"
GROUP BY MyTable.Created ;
You only need HAVING when you want to have criteria on the results
of the summary.
Until recently, I didn't know there was a WHERE option in the
dropdown list (where GroupBy and Sum and so forth are) in the QBE --
it's at the bottom of the list, and I never scrolled down there to
see it. Because of that, I'd been doing complex subqueries to get my
base recordset filtered so I could apply my summaries to the right
records, since if it's in the group by you end up with the wrong
numbers.
--
David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/
There was a discussion of this on m.p.sqlserver.p rogramming only a few
days ago on the 24th, Question regarding "HAVING COUNT(*)=0".
What I got out of it was that using an aggregate function without a
GROUP BY clause means there is just one single group. Thus, HAVING is
appropriate.
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:54:38 -0500, "David W. Fenton"
<XX*******@dfen ton.com.invalid wrote:
>I still don't get why you need a HQAVING because you have no GROUP BY clause.
Hi David,
comments in-line.
"David W. Fenton" <XX*******@dfen ton.com.invalid wrote in
news:Xn******** *************** ***********@127 .0.0.1:
uBob Quintal <rq******@sPAmp atico.cawrote in
news:Xn******** **************@ 66.150.105.47:
>In a summary query, any field in the WHERE clause also has to be in the SELECT clause. because the where is applied after the sum(), average() etc... and if it's in the SELECT clause it has
to
>be in a function like sum(), first(), etc... or in the GROUP BY Clause
To get around this, there is a HAVING clause. which is applicable to the records before the sum() is performed.Just change AND AND (([Lake Worth... to HAVING AND (([Lake Worth C... and it should work.
This is wrong.
However, I'll admit, it was something *I* didn't know until the
last
cople of years. Here is some perfectly valoid SQL:
SELECT MyTable.Created , Count(MyTable.I nventoryID) AS Count
FROM
MyTable
WHERE MyTable.Updated By="MWB"
GROUP BY MyTable.Created ;
You only need HAVING when you want to have criteria on the results
of the summary.
I wish the help were more explicit on the difference between where
and having, I thought it was the inverse.
>
Until recently, I didn't know there was a WHERE option in the
dropdown list (where GroupBy and Sum and so forth are) in the QBE
it's at the bottom of the list, and I never scrolled down there to
see it.
And there is no HAVING option in the list at all. Access seems to
know when to use one or the other, but it certainly doesn't make
that knowledge easy to find.
Because of that, I'd been doing complex subqueries to get my
base recordset filtered so I could apply my summaries to the right
records, since if it's in the group by you end up with the wrong
numbers.
--
Bob Quintal
PA is y I've altered my email address.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: ~greg |
last post by:
I have links on an index page like this:
<a href="link" onclick="DoOnClick('link')"> page title </a>
-where the DoOnClick("link")
just adds a query part to the url before executing:
location.href = "link?query";
( this is done in order to maintain certain state information
|
by: Conner |
last post by:
Hi Bob,
I know this reply is a little late for you but I just came accross
your post. You might be interested to know that there is a pretty good
query tool available on download.com called Universal Table Browser.
It is a multi-database enterprise level query tool and I have been
able to open data sets that contain literally millions of records in a
matter of seconds with it.
|
by: Max Harvey |
last post by:
Hi,
I have looked at the example called "Open Parameter queries from code"
from the site http://www.mvps.org/access/queries/qry0003.htm
I made up a test which I though looked pretty close (which I will
paste below)
I have put it on the BeforeUpdate event of a form I am using, but
whenever it is called, I get "Run-time error '13':, Type mismatch
|
by: Johm |
last post by:
In my query, consisting of 2 tables, customers and orders,i get the
employeeid number ordered with a given customer.
The query is the following :
SELECT orders.orderid, Customers.Customerid, Customers.EmployeeID
FROM orders INNER JOIN Customers ON orders.customerid =
Customers.Customerid;
If i add on another table in the query, the tables Employees, then my
query
|
by: LoopyNZ |
last post by:
Hi,
(Access 97)
I'm creating a query (QRY_SUMMARY) to join a query (QRY) to itself
(QRY_1). I'm returning QRY.* and selected fields from QRY_1. With each
field (field_name) I return from QRY_1 I'm appending "_1" to to the end
to avoid name conflicts with the fields from QRY, i.e. "field_name"
becomes "field_name_1".
| |
by: Robert |
last post by:
I am an attorney in a non-profit organization and a self-taught programmer.
I'm trying to create a client db that will allow me to search for potential
conflicts of interest based either on Social Security # or on Last Name.
I've created two different tables with the following fields in each table:
ClientInfo
Client# (primary key)
First Name
Middle Name
Last Name
|
by: lorirobn |
last post by:
Hi,
I have a query that I have been using as a record source for a form
with no problems. I just created a new "addnew" form, and added 20
records to the table with this form. The problem I now have is I
cannot modify data on these new records using my query.
The query's sql is: SELECT tblSpaceUse.* FROM tblSpaceUse;
The error I get is:
"Write Conflict -
|
by: Stan |
last post by:
I am using MS Office Access 2003 (11.5614). My basic question is can
I run a query of a query datasheet. I want to use more that one
criteria and can not get that query to work. I thought I might be
able to accomplish the results in two steps by using two queries. If
this is possible how can I do it?
Thank you,
Stan Hanna
|
by: lotus18 |
last post by:
Hello all
I have these records on my Day Table for my complete database table please click here
1. M
2. T
3. W
4. TH
5. F
6. S
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that captivates audiences and drives business growth.
The Art of Business Website Design
Your website is...
| |
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
| |
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
| |