call_user_func( ) vs. "variable functions"

[elektrophyte]

I was looking at the PHP function "call_user_func ()"
(http://us3.php.net/call_user_func). It appears that this will solve a
design problem in the app I'm working on. (I'm writing a class that
will allow a PHP programmer to call their own custom functions.)

However, in the comments a couple people mention "variable functions".
E.g., "You should avoid this function and use variable function calls
instead!"

What are "variable functions"?

Thanks,

E

[Andy Hassall]

On 10 Jul 2005 13:11:53 -0700, "elektrophy te" <el**********@y ahoo.com> wrote:

I was looking at the PHP function "call_user_func ()"
(http://us3.php.net/call_user_func). It appears that this will solve a
design problem in the app I'm working on. (I'm writing a class that
will allow a PHP programmer to call their own custom functions.)

However, in the comments a couple people mention "variable functions".
E.g., "You should avoid this function and use variable function calls
instead!"
They're quite similar, and the choice probably just comes down to an opinion
on style.

However, call_user_func_ array has distinct advantages, such as not needing to
know the number of parameters in advance.
What are "variable functions"?

http://uk.php.net/manual/en/function...-functions.php

--
Andy Hassall / <an**@andyh.co. uk> / <http://www.andyh.co.uk >
<http://www.andyhsoftwa re.co.uk/space> Space: disk usage analysis tool

[elektrophyte]

Oh so that's what "variable functions" are. It's funny, I searched but
that didn't come up. It's a cool piece of language functionality, but
it looks like it could lead to some really hard-to-read code. I think
I'll use the more verbose, but clearer "call_user_func ()" method.

E

[Chung Leong]

Functionally the two methods are the same. They differ in how PHP
reacts when the specified function is undefined. Calling a non-existing
function through a variable causes a fatal error, while
call_user_func( ) returns a warning.