sleep or delay

[raulavi]

what should be used?
In a normal procedure (no thread) I would like to wait (do nothing) for few
secs.

I used a loop with with a clock , sleep and some thing else.

my concern is not to eat the cpu time. what shoul I use?

I see some thread.sleep, but will this work on a normal procedure?
shall I consider a procedure as a thread ? or are there any differences ?

[Armin Zingler]

"raulavi" <ra*****@discussions.microsoft.com> schrieb

what should be used?
In a normal procedure (no thread) I would like to wait (do nothing)
for few
secs.

I used a loop with with a clock , sleep and some thing else.

my concern is not to eat the cpu time. what shoul I use?

I see some thread.sleep, but will this work on a normal procedure?
shall I consider a procedure as a thread ? or are there any
differences ?

A thread executes code. Your procedure belongs to that code. Use
Thread.Sleep to have the thread sleep.
Armin

[AMercer]

> what should be used?

In a normal procedure (no thread) I would like to wait (do nothing) for few
secs.
my concern is not to eat the cpu time. what shoul I use?

Use System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(Milliseconds).

[Andrew Morton]

raulavi wrote:

what should be used?
In a normal procedure (no thread) I would like to wait (do nothing)
for few secs.

I see some thread.sleep, but will this work on a normal procedure?

Yes, and yes.

Andrew

[CMM]

If this helps to put it into perspective:

System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(...)
does the same thing AFAIK:
System.Threading.Thread.CurrentThread.Sleep(...)

--
-C. Moya
www.cmoya.com
"Andrew Morton" <ak*@in-press.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
news:%2***************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

raulavi wrote:

what should be used?
In a normal procedure (no thread) I would like to wait (do nothing)
for few secs.

I see some thread.sleep, but will this work on a normal procedure?

Yes, and yes.

Andrew