I'm working on a Visual Basic .NET using Access database. However, my
client already have a 30MB database with Sybase ASA and Sybase is way
too much for that. Is there anyway I can migrate from a Sybase to
Access? or is it possible at all. If it is not, can these two databases
co-exist together?
Dec 14 '06
26  2393 
Bummer for you. I've had VB desktop applications using Access as a
back-end that had 75 users and 500MB+ of data, with no problem
whatsoever. There's no reason that wouldn't work for sstory, if he
didn't want to use SQLServer.
Robin S.
----------------------------------
<aa*********@gm ail.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ 42g2000cwt.goog legroups.com...
I've had Access apps with 25 mb of data that can't support a half
dozen
users.
MDB shouldn't be used for a single user nor a single record.
If MS had a decade-long policy of preaching SQL over MDB then _MAYBE_
I
would be willing to accept SQL 2005 _CRAP_ that is built into VB 2005.
As it is; I can't reccomend SQL 2005 _anywhere_ since it's not
supported on TRANSMETA (_BLADES_ and tablets), it doesn't support SQL
Agent; and it doesn't support replication like MSDE 2.0 did
-Aaron
RobinS wrote:
>Why would Access bite with a 30MB database -- that's nothing.
I've had apps with an Access database that was 500MB, and the
performance was fine.
It would be better to migrate to SQLServer Express, but using
Access won't kill him.
Robin S.
---------------------------------
"sstory" <no*****@no.com wrote in message
news:uL******* *******@TK2MSFT NGP04.phx.gbl.. .
Not sure of the question.
1.) Access would really bite with a 30MB database--not
recommended.
2.) Access could use link tables to link to Sybase perhaps and
give
you "access" to it. then again, why would you use Access if that
were
possible instead of just getting the drivers to connect directly to
Sybase.
3.) If it is a problem you might consider migrating to MySQL.
"codercode" <wo********@gma il.comwrote in message
news:11******** *************@8 0g2000cwy.googl egroups.com...
I'm working on a Visual Basic .NET using Access database. However,
my
client already have a 30MB database with Sybase ASA and Sybase is
way
too much for that. Is there anyway I can migrate from a Sybase to
Access? or is it possible at all. If it is not, can these two
databases
co-exist together?
I disagree.
I don't know or care how much effort it took; all I know is that ADP is
a better platform.
MDB is for lamers and fucking retards.
it makes no sense for newbies to learn TWO DIFFERENT DIALECTS OF SQL.
That is the FATAL FLAW WITH MDB-- It shouldn't be targeted at Junior
Developers.
And it's not reliable enough for normal developers.
I just don't believe you when you say that you've had 75 users and
500mb data.
I've had a dozen MDB files with a total of 1.5 gb crap out left and
right.
and I've had a single MDB split properly into front end and back end
(gag) that can't support a half dozen users.
-Aaron
RobinS wrote:
Bummer for you. I've had VB desktop applications using Access as a
back-end that had 75 users and 500MB+ of data, with no problem
whatsoever. There's no reason that wouldn't work for sstory, if he
didn't want to use SQLServer.
Robin S.
----------------------------------
<aa*********@gm ail.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ 42g2000cwt.goog legroups.com...
I've had Access apps with 25 mb of data that can't support a half
dozen
users.
MDB shouldn't be used for a single user nor a single record.
If MS had a decade-long policy of preaching SQL over MDB then _MAYBE_
I
would be willing to accept SQL 2005 _CRAP_ that is built into VB 2005.
As it is; I can't reccomend SQL 2005 _anywhere_ since it's not
supported on TRANSMETA (_BLADES_ and tablets), it doesn't support SQL
Agent; and it doesn't support replication like MSDE 2.0 did
-Aaron
RobinS wrote:
Why would Access bite with a 30MB database -- that's nothing.
I've had apps with an Access database that was 500MB, and the
performance was fine.
It would be better to migrate to SQLServer Express, but using
Access won't kill him.
Robin S.
---------------------------------
"sstory" <no*****@no.com wrote in message
news:uL******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP04.phx.gbl...
Not sure of the question.
1.) Access would really bite with a 30MB database--not
recommended.
2.) Access could use link tables to link to Sybase perhaps and
give
you "access" to it. then again, why would you use Access if that
were
possible instead of just getting the drivers to connect directly to
Sybase.
3.) If it is a problem you might consider migrating to MySQL.
"codercode" <wo********@gma il.comwrote in message
news:11******** *************@8 0g2000cwy.googl egroups.com...
I'm working on a Visual Basic .NET using Access database. However,
my
client already have a 30MB database with Sybase ASA and Sybase is
way
too much for that. Is there anyway I can migrate from a Sybase to
Access? or is it possible at all. If it is not, can these two
databases
co-exist together?
Well, it doesn't matter to me whether or not you believe me. The
application is still running 2 years after I left, and the database
is now about 900MB. Their only complaint is how long it takes to
compact it...
Robin S.
--------------------------------------------------
<aa*********@gm ail.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ i80g2000cwc.goo glegroups.com.. .
>I disagree.
I don't know or care how much effort it took; all I know is that ADP
is
a better platform.
MDB is for lamers and fucking retards.
it makes no sense for newbies to learn TWO DIFFERENT DIALECTS OF SQL.
That is the FATAL FLAW WITH MDB-- It shouldn't be targeted at Junior
Developers.
And it's not reliable enough for normal developers.
I just don't believe you when you say that you've had 75 users and
500mb data.
I've had a dozen MDB files with a total of 1.5 gb crap out left and
right.
and I've had a single MDB split properly into front end and back end
(gag) that can't support a half dozen users.
-Aaron
RobinS wrote:
>Bummer for you. I've had VB desktop applications using Access as a
back-end that had 75 users and 500MB+ of data, with no problem
whatsoever. There's no reason that wouldn't work for sstory, if he
didn't want to use SQLServer.
Robin S.
----------------------------------
<aa*********@g mail.comwrote in message
news:11******* *************** @42g2000cwt.goo glegroups.com.. .
I've had Access apps with 25 mb of data that can't support a half
dozen
users.
MDB shouldn't be used for a single user nor a single record.
If MS had a decade-long policy of preaching SQL over MDB then
_MAYBE_
I
would be willing to accept SQL 2005 _CRAP_ that is built into VB
2005.
As it is; I can't reccomend SQL 2005 _anywhere_ since it's not
supported on TRANSMETA (_BLADES_ and tablets), it doesn't support
SQL
Agent; and it doesn't support replication like MSDE 2.0 did
-Aaron
RobinS wrote:
Why would Access bite with a 30MB database -- that's nothing.
I've had apps with an Access database that was 500MB, and the
performance was fine.
It would be better to migrate to SQLServer Express, but using
Access won't kill him.
Robin S.
---------------------------------
"sstory" <no*****@no.com wrote in message
news:uL******* *******@TK2MSFT NGP04.phx.gbl.. .
Not sure of the question.
1.) Access would really bite with a 30MB database--not
recommended.
2.) Access could use link tables to link to Sybase perhaps
and
give
you "access" to it. then again, why would you use Access if
that
were
possible instead of just getting the drivers to connect directly
to
Sybase.
3.) If it is a problem you might consider migrating to MySQL.
"codercode" <wo********@gma il.comwrote in message
news:11******** *************@8 0g2000cwy.googl egroups.com...
I'm working on a Visual Basic .NET using Access database.
However,
my
client already have a 30MB database with Sybase ASA and Sybase
is
way
too much for that. Is there anyway I can migrate from a Sybase
to
Access? or is it possible at all. If it is not, can these two
databases
co-exist together?
rofl
you fucking retards still kick users out of the databases in order to
compact and repair?
how fucking antiquated
I mean seriously your little bullshit dime-store solutions aren't
trouble free.
they just send their work elsewhere since you're a fucking newbie
Access baby mother fucker
-Aaron
RobinS wrote:
Well, it doesn't matter to me whether or not you believe me. The
application is still running 2 years after I left, and the database
is now about 900MB. Their only complaint is how long it takes to
compact it...
Robin S.
--------------------------------------------------
<aa*********@gm ail.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ i80g2000cwc.goo glegroups.com.. .
I disagree.
I don't know or care how much effort it took; all I know is that ADP
is
a better platform.
MDB is for lamers and fucking retards.
it makes no sense for newbies to learn TWO DIFFERENT DIALECTS OF SQL.
That is the FATAL FLAW WITH MDB-- It shouldn't be targeted at Junior
Developers.
And it's not reliable enough for normal developers.
I just don't believe you when you say that you've had 75 users and
500mb data.
I've had a dozen MDB files with a total of 1.5 gb crap out left and
right.
and I've had a single MDB split properly into front end and back end
(gag) that can't support a half dozen users.
-Aaron
RobinS wrote:
Bummer for you. I've had VB desktop applications using Access as a
back-end that had 75 users and 500MB+ of data, with no problem
whatsoever. There's no reason that wouldn't work for sstory, if he
didn't want to use SQLServer.
Robin S.
----------------------------------
<aa*********@gm ail.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ 42g2000cwt.goog legroups.com...
I've had Access apps with 25 mb of data that can't support a half
dozen
users.
MDB shouldn't be used for a single user nor a single record.
If MS had a decade-long policy of preaching SQL over MDB then
_MAYBE_
I
would be willing to accept SQL 2005 _CRAP_ that is built into VB
2005.
As it is; I can't reccomend SQL 2005 _anywhere_ since it's not
supported on TRANSMETA (_BLADES_ and tablets), it doesn't support
SQL
Agent; and it doesn't support replication like MSDE 2.0 did
-Aaron
RobinS wrote:
Why would Access bite with a 30MB database -- that's nothing.
I've had apps with an Access database that was 500MB, and the
performance was fine.
It would be better to migrate to SQLServer Express, but using
Access won't kill him.
Robin S.
---------------------------------
"sstory" <no*****@no.com wrote in message
news:uL******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP04.phx.gbl...
Not sure of the question.
1.) Access would really bite with a 30MB database--not
recommended.
2.) Access could use link tables to link to Sybase perhaps
and
give
you "access" to it. then again, why would you use Access if
that
were
possible instead of just getting the drivers to connect directly
to
Sybase.
3.) If it is a problem you might consider migrating to MySQL.
"codercode" <wo********@gma il.comwrote in message
news:11******** *************@8 0g2000cwy.googl egroups.com...
I'm working on a Visual Basic .NET using Access database.
However,
my
client already have a 30MB database with Sybase ASA and Sybase
is
way
too much for that. Is there anyway I can migrate from a Sybase
to
Access? or is it possible at all. If it is not, can these two
databases
co-exist together?
No, they usually compact it in the middle of the night.
Try not to be unnecessarily abusive, Aaron. You don't comprehend
why the solution was chosen, and I'm not going to explain it to you,
because all you'll do is whine about VB going away.
Robin S.
VB2005.Net programmer
----------------------------------
<aa*********@gm ail.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ 42g2000cwt.goog legroups.com...
rofl
you fucking retards still kick users out of the databases in order to
compact and repair?
how fucking antiquated
I mean seriously your little bullshit dime-store solutions aren't
trouble free.
they just send their work elsewhere since you're a fucking newbie
Access baby mother fucker
-Aaron
RobinS wrote:
>Well, it doesn't matter to me whether or not you believe me. The
application is still running 2 years after I left, and the database
is now about 900MB. Their only complaint is how long it takes to
compact it...
Robin S.
--------------------------------------------------
<aa*********@g mail.comwrote in message
news:11******* *************** @i80g2000cwc.go oglegroups.com. ..
>I disagree.
I don't know or care how much effort it took; all I know is that
ADP
is
a better platform.
MDB is for lamers and fucking retards.
it makes no sense for newbies to learn TWO DIFFERENT DIALECTS OF
SQL.
That is the FATAL FLAW WITH MDB-- It shouldn't be targeted at
Junior
Developers.
And it's not reliable enough for normal developers.
I just don't believe you when you say that you've had 75 users and
500mb data.
I've had a dozen MDB files with a total of 1.5 gb crap out left and
right.
and I've had a single MDB split properly into front end and back
end
(gag) that can't support a half dozen users.
-Aaron
RobinS wrote:
Bummer for you. I've had VB desktop applications using Access as a
back-end that had 75 users and 500MB+ of data, with no problem
whatsoever. There's no reason that wouldn't work for sstory, if he
didn't want to use SQLServer.
Robin S.
----------------------------------
<aa*********@g mail.comwrote in message
news:11******* *************** @42g2000cwt.goo glegroups.com.. .
I've had Access apps with 25 mb of data that can't support a
half
dozen
users.
MDB shouldn't be used for a single user nor a single record.
If MS had a decade-long policy of preaching SQL over MDB then
_MAYBE_
I
would be willing to accept SQL 2005 _CRAP_ that is built into VB
2005.
As it is; I can't reccomend SQL 2005 _anywhere_ since it's not
supported on TRANSMETA (_BLADES_ and tablets), it doesn't
support
SQL
Agent; and it doesn't support replication like MSDE 2.0 did
-Aaron
RobinS wrote:
Why would Access bite with a 30MB database -- that's nothing.
I've had apps with an Access database that was 500MB, and the
performance was fine.
It would be better to migrate to SQLServer Express, but using
Access won't kill him.
Robin S.
---------------------------------
"sstory" <no*****@no.com wrote in message
news:uL******* *******@TK2MSFT NGP04.phx.gbl.. .
Not sure of the question.
1.) Access would really bite with a 30MB database--not
recommended.
2.) Access could use link tables to link to Sybase perhaps
and
give
you "access" to it. then again, why would you use Access if
that
were
possible instead of just getting the drivers to connect
directly
to
Sybase.
3.) If it is a problem you might consider migrating to
MySQL.
"codercode" <wo********@gma il.comwrote in message
news:11******** *************@8 0g2000cwy.googl egroups.com...
I'm working on a Visual Basic .NET using Access database.
However,
my
client already have a 30MB database with Sybase ASA and
Sybase
is
way
too much for that. Is there anyway I can migrate from a
Sybase
to
Access? or is it possible at all. If it is not, can these
two
databases
co-exist together?
I whine because they killed off vb6.. then they killed off ACCESS by
bringing back DAO
I'm sick and fucking tired of a new data access layer every 12 months
and I refuse-- militantly-- to use DAO again.
that is why I am in the VB newsgroup-- to bitch about the first
misdeed--- the death of VB because now that Access is a dead issue then
I need to bitch up a storm to the 'real vb' lol
as if
vb has been dead for 5 years; and microsoft's lack of commitment to the
language makes me disgusted.
MIcrosofts' first development tool was for BASIC wasn't it?
Why have they turned their back on the worlds most popular programming
language?
-Aaron
RobinS wrote:
No, they usually compact it in the middle of the night.
Try not to be unnecessarily abusive, Aaron. You don't comprehend
why the solution was chosen, and I'm not going to explain it to you,
because all you'll do is whine about VB going away.
Robin S.
VB2005.Net programmer
----------------------------------
<aa*********@gm ail.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ 42g2000cwt.goog legroups.com...
rofl
you fucking retards still kick users out of the databases in order to
compact and repair?
how fucking antiquated
I mean seriously your little bullshit dime-store solutions aren't
trouble free.
they just send their work elsewhere since you're a fucking newbie
Access baby mother fucker
-Aaron
RobinS wrote:
Well, it doesn't matter to me whether or not you believe me. The
application is still running 2 years after I left, and the database
is now about 900MB. Their only complaint is how long it takes to
compact it...
Robin S.
--------------------------------------------------
<aa*********@gm ail.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ i80g2000cwc.goo glegroups.com.. .
I disagree.
I don't know or care how much effort it took; all I know is that
ADP
is
a better platform.
MDB is for lamers and fucking retards.
it makes no sense for newbies to learn TWO DIFFERENT DIALECTS OF
SQL.
That is the FATAL FLAW WITH MDB-- It shouldn't be targeted at
Junior
Developers.
And it's not reliable enough for normal developers.
I just don't believe you when you say that you've had 75 users and
500mb data.
I've had a dozen MDB files with a total of 1.5 gb crap out left and
right.
and I've had a single MDB split properly into front end and back
end
(gag) that can't support a half dozen users.
-Aaron
RobinS wrote:
Bummer for you. I've had VB desktop applications using Access as a
back-end that had 75 users and 500MB+ of data, with no problem
whatsoever. There's no reason that wouldn't work for sstory, if he
didn't want to use SQLServer.
Robin S.
----------------------------------
<aa*********@gm ail.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ 42g2000cwt.goog legroups.com...
I've had Access apps with 25 mb of data that can't support a
half
dozen
users.
MDB shouldn't be used for a single user nor a single record.
If MS had a decade-long policy of preaching SQL over MDB then
_MAYBE_
I
would be willing to accept SQL 2005 _CRAP_ that is built into VB
2005.
As it is; I can't reccomend SQL 2005 _anywhere_ since it's not
supported on TRANSMETA (_BLADES_ and tablets), it doesn't
support
SQL
Agent; and it doesn't support replication like MSDE 2.0 did
-Aaron
RobinS wrote:
Why would Access bite with a 30MB database -- that's nothing.
I've had apps with an Access database that was 500MB, and the
performance was fine.
It would be better to migrate to SQLServer Express, but using
Access won't kill him.
Robin S.
---------------------------------
"sstory" <no*****@no.com wrote in message
news:uL******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP04.phx.gbl...
Not sure of the question.
1.) Access would really bite with a 30MB database--not
recommended.
2.) Access could use link tables to link to Sybase perhaps
and
give
you "access" to it. then again, why would you use Access if
that
were
possible instead of just getting the drivers to connect
directly
to
Sybase.
3.) If it is a problem you might consider migrating to
MySQL.
"codercode" <wo********@gma il.comwrote in message
news:11******** *************@8 0g2000cwy.googl egroups.com...
I'm working on a Visual Basic .NET using Access database.
However,
my
client already have a 30MB database with Sybase ASA and
Sybase
is
way
too much for that. Is there anyway I can migrate from a
Sybase
to
Access? or is it possible at all. If it is not, can these
two
databases
co-exist together?
Told you so.
Robin S.
------------------------------
<aa*********@gm ail.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ s80g2000cwa.goo glegroups.com.. .
>I whine because they killed off vb6.. then they killed off ACCESS by
bringing back DAO
I'm sick and fucking tired of a new data access layer every 12 months
and I refuse-- militantly-- to use DAO again.
that is why I am in the VB newsgroup-- to bitch about the first
misdeed--- the death of VB because now that Access is a dead issue
then
I need to bitch up a storm to the 'real vb' lol
as if
vb has been dead for 5 years; and microsoft's lack of commitment to
the
language makes me disgusted.
MIcrosofts' first development tool was for BASIC wasn't it?
Why have they turned their back on the worlds most popular programming
language?
-Aaron
RobinS wrote:
>No, they usually compact it in the middle of the night.
Try not to be unnecessarily abusive, Aaron. You don't comprehend
why the solution was chosen, and I'm not going to explain it to you,
because all you'll do is whine about VB going away.
Robin S.
VB2005.Net programmer
----------------------------------
<aa*********@g mail.comwrote in message
news:11******* *************** @42g2000cwt.goo glegroups.com.. .
rofl
you fucking retards still kick users out of the databases in order
to
compact and repair?
how fucking antiquated
I mean seriously your little bullshit dime-store solutions aren't
trouble free.
they just send their work elsewhere since you're a fucking newbie
Access baby mother fucker
-Aaron
RobinS wrote:
Well, it doesn't matter to me whether or not you believe me. The
application is still running 2 years after I left, and the
database
is now about 900MB. Their only complaint is how long it takes to
compact it...
Robin S.
--------------------------------------------------
<aa*********@g mail.comwrote in message
news:11******* *************** @i80g2000cwc.go oglegroups.com. ..
I disagree.
I don't know or care how much effort it took; all I know is that
ADP
is
a better platform.
MDB is for lamers and fucking retards.
it makes no sense for newbies to learn TWO DIFFERENT DIALECTS OF
SQL.
That is the FATAL FLAW WITH MDB-- It shouldn't be targeted at
Junior
Developers.
And it's not reliable enough for normal developers.
I just don't believe you when you say that you've had 75 users
and
500mb data.
I've had a dozen MDB files with a total of 1.5 gb crap out left
and
right.
and I've had a single MDB split properly into front end and back
end
(gag) that can't support a half dozen users.
-Aaron
RobinS wrote:
Bummer for you. I've had VB desktop applications using Access
as a
back-end that had 75 users and 500MB+ of data, with no problem
whatsoever. There's no reason that wouldn't work for sstory, if
he
didn't want to use SQLServer.
Robin S.
----------------------------------
<aa*********@g mail.comwrote in message
news:11******* *************** @42g2000cwt.goo glegroups.com.. .
I've had Access apps with 25 mb of data that can't support a
half
dozen
users.
MDB shouldn't be used for a single user nor a single record.
If MS had a decade-long policy of preaching SQL over MDB then
_MAYBE_
I
would be willing to accept SQL 2005 _CRAP_ that is built into
VB
2005.
As it is; I can't reccomend SQL 2005 _anywhere_ since it's
not
supported on TRANSMETA (_BLADES_ and tablets), it doesn't
support
SQL
Agent; and it doesn't support replication like MSDE 2.0 did
-Aaron
RobinS wrote:
Why would Access bite with a 30MB database -- that's
nothing.
I've had apps with an Access database that was 500MB, and
the
performance was fine.
It would be better to migrate to SQLServer Express, but
using
Access won't kill him.
Robin S.
---------------------------------
"sstory" <no*****@no.com wrote in message
news:uL******* *******@TK2MSFT NGP04.phx.gbl.. .
Not sure of the question.
1.) Access would really bite with a 30MB database--not
recommended.
2.) Access could use link tables to link to Sybase
perhaps
and
give
you "access" to it. then again, why would you use Access
if
that
were
possible instead of just getting the drivers to connect
directly
to
Sybase.
3.) If it is a problem you might consider migrating to
MySQL.
"codercode" <wo********@gma il.comwrote in message
news:11******** *************@8 0g2000cwy.googl egroups.com...
I'm working on a Visual Basic .NET using Access database.
However,
my
client already have a 30MB database with Sybase ASA and
Sybase
is
way
too much for that. Is there anyway I can migrate from a
Sybase
to
Access? or is it possible at all. If it is not, can these
two
databases
co-exist together?
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics | |
by: Wellingotn Rampazo |
last post by:
Hi guyz....
I'd like to know if anyone has already used C# components (COM+) or C#
WebServices connected with Sybase System 11.
Are there anyone who knows about it ? What driver version ? or native sybase
driver ?
Thanks.
|
by: aww91 |
last post by:
Need product information on IBM's Integration Integrator (I.I) for
conversion of SyBase calls to UDB calls. Production allows for
conversion of modules one-by-one and then when all modules are
converted the database (SyBase) can be converted and I.I removed.
Last I heard the product was in beta.
Any information would be appreciated...
|
by: bala |
last post by:
hi access guru's
there is a requirement wherein i have to connect ms access frontend
with sybase (backend). the data from the frontend should be saved in
the table in sybase databae thro rational suite of tools.
any hints, pointers regarding the above situation would be veri
helpful.
thanx, have a great week ahead
|
by: Chris Fox via .NET 247 |
last post by:
I'm trying to access a Sybase database using Visual .net C#
using the code below.
I've added the Sybase data provider to the references (DDTek.Sybase)
and added them to the program usage. Howver it fails to connect and
gives an Unhandled exception of type "DDTek.Sybase.SybaseException' occured in
ddtek.sybase.dll
I can connect using the sybase SQL advantage with no problems.
Cheers
|
by: Alex Murphy |
last post by:
As title, Thanks
| | |
by: anupamakrishnan |
last post by:
I need to connect to sybase using MS Access..
The following methods can be used for the purpose
1. Start up MS Access.
2.1 On first use:
Specify "Create a New Database Using", "Blank Database".
Specify it's name and where to store the mdb file.
2.2 on subsequent uses:
Specify Open an Existing Database." and select the appropriate
one.
|
by: mohsin |
last post by:
Hi Expert
Hope i point to the right grps,
I need to connect my access to sybase ASE database and the collect/import the
data.
I have to use right driver to connect. Questions is, which one? and where can
i get it..
I try www.sybase.com but not able to find the link to download the driver,
|
by: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Sabl=E9?= |
last post by:
WHAT IS IT:
The Sybase module provides a Python interface to the Sybase relational
database system. It supports all of the Python Database API, version
2.0 with extensions.
The module is available here:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/python-sybase/python-sybase-0.39.tar.gz
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language synchronization. With a Microsoft account, language settings sync across devices. To prevent any complications,...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
| | |
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules.
He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms.
Adolph will...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image.
Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in the same network. But I'm wondering if it's possible to do the same thing, with 2 Pfsense firewalls...
|
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
|
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
|
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |
