Any difference about "me" or without "me"

[Agnes]

For my own practices.
I like to put "Me".
e.g IF Me.txtInvoice.t extlength = 0 ....... etc
Me.txt.....etc

However, Is there any difference (without Me) ??
Thanks

[Mike Smith]

....coding me or the lack of it is the same..the only "difference " is the
length of the line of code

however with the "ME" its easy to access the controls on the form , if ur
unsure or just lazy to type the name of the textbox u can always
autocomplete it with the intellisense...
--
Regards,
Mike
http://bikesh.europe.webmatrixhosting.net
http://www.planetsourcecode.com (search keyword: phoetus)

"Agnes" <ag***@dynamict ech.com.hk> wrote in message
news:%2******** *******@TK2MSFT NGP12.phx.gbl.. .

For my own practices.
I like to put "Me".
e.g IF Me.txtInvoice.t extlength = 0 ....... etc
Me.txt.....etc

However, Is there any difference (without Me) ??
Thanks

....coding me or the lack of it is the same..the only "difference " is the
length of the line of code

however with the "ME" its easy to access the controls on the form , if ur
unsure or just lazy to type the name of the textbox u can always
autocomplete it with the intellisense...
--
Regards,
Mike
http://bikesh.europe.webmatrixhosting.net
http://www.planetsourcecode.com (search keyword: phoetus)

"Agnes" <ag***@dynamict ech.com.hk> wrote in message
news:%2******** *******@TK2MSFT NGP12.phx.gbl.. . For my own practices.
I like to put "Me".
e.g IF Me.txtInvoice.t extlength = 0 ....... etc
Me.txt.....etc

However, Is there any difference (without Me) ??
Thanks

[Mattias Sjögren]

However, Is there any difference (without Me) ??

No, not as long as you don't have any conflicting variables. If you
have both a local and a class level variable with the same name, you
can disambiguate it with Me.

Mattias

--
Mattias Sjögren [MVP] mattias @ mvps.org
http://www.msjogren.net/dotnet/ | http://www.dotnetinterop.com
Please reply only to the newsgroup.

[Agnes]

;O ic thanks .
for my vfp experience.
If I use " thisform.txt... ..etc" , the program will run slowly . so I wonder
whehter got the same effect.
"Mattias Sjögren" <ma************ ********@mvps.o rg> ???
news:%2******** *******@TK2MSFT NGP11.phx.gbl ???...

However, Is there any difference (without Me) ??

No, not as long as you don't have any conflicting variables. If you
have both a local and a class level variable with the same name, you
can disambiguate it with Me.

Mattias

--
Mattias Sjögren [MVP] mattias @ mvps.org
http://www.msjogren.net/dotnet/ | http://www.dotnetinterop.com
Please reply only to the newsgroup.

[Cor Ligthert]

Hi Agnes,

An often made misunderstandin g, in an interpretted language the lenght of a
dataname can make sense because it has always to be loaded and evaluated.

For a program language which makes executables (in whatever form and without
debugging information) the lenght or form of your variable names should not
matter at all. In that a dataname is nothing more than a mnemonic for the
programmer.

I hope this helps?

Cor

[Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]]

* "Mike Smith" <te**@test.co m> scripsit:

however with the "ME" its easy to access the controls on the form , if ur
unsure or just lazy to type the name of the textbox u can always
autocomplete it with the intellisense...

That's why I always use 'Me', except for private variables ('m_*').

--
Herfried K. Wagner [MVP]
<URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/>
<URL:http://dotnet.mvps.org/dotnet/faqs/>