Hi,
we found some strange behavior when operating with floats and round().
The following simplified statement reproduces the problem.
select 6.56 - round(convert(float, 6.56), 2)
from sysusers where name = 'public';
===========
-8.88178419
In "real world", the floats are not literals, but float fields in tables.
I could figure, that 6.56 - 6.56 will result in something like 0.00001,
but -8.88178419 is beyond my imagination.
The same statement without round results in 0.
Has anyone any clue on this?
Regards,
Peter 5 12596
Somehow you're truncating the result, and losing the E-16 (which means
*10^-16). Where are you retrieving your results? I doubt query analyzer
would do this..
select 6.56 - round(convert(float, 6.56), 2)
-----------------------------------------------------
-8.8817841970012523E-16
BTW, you can add E or E0 to the end instead of convert(float, constant)
select 6.56 - round(6.56e, 2)
-----------------------------------------------------
-8.8817841970012523E-16
6.56 is a decimal constant, and 6.56e is a float. Rounding apparently rounds
up, even when the result is further from the exact number.
select 6.56e union all
select round(6.56e,2)
-----------------------------------------------------
6.5599999999999996
6.5600000000000005
If your client app can't deal with floats properly, perhaps you could pass
back a varchar:
select cast(cast(6.56e as decimal(9,2)) as varchar(10))
----------
6.56
Actually, the cast as decimal shouldn't be necessary; casting as varchar
automatically rounds:
select cast(6.56e as varchar(10))
----------
6.56
Actually, it rounds a lot more than I would have thought
select cast(6.560001e as varchar(54))
------------------------------------------------------
6.56
If I want to see more digits, it seems I have to cast as decimal...
select cast(cast(6.56000001e as decimal(9,8)) as varchar(10))
----------
6.56000001
But be careful:
select cast(cast(6.56000001e as decimal(9,8)) as varchar(9))
Server: Msg 8115, Level 16, State 5, Line 1
Arithmetic overflow error converting numeric to data type varchar.
Return no more than 16 digits (15 decimals) for a number 0..10 and it should
be rounded properly.
select cast(cast(6.56e as decimal(18,17)) as varchar(19))
-------------------
6.55999999999999960
select cast(cast(6.56e as decimal(18,15)) as varchar(19))
-------------------
6.560000000000000
--
Incidentally, I wonder why QA sees the need to return a 53-character result
for a float. It should never need to be over 18 decimals + 1 for the decimal
point + 5 for the exponent = 24.
Hmm, BOL says this about float data type:
The Microsoft® SQL ServerT float[(n)] data type conforms to the SQL-92
standard for all values of n from 1 to 53. The synonym for double precision
is float(53).
So it's treating the precision (53) as the the width... weird.
---------------------------------------
"Peter Scheurer" <sc******@gmx.com> wrote in message
news:2b**************************@posting.google.c om...
Hi,
we found some strange behavior when operating with floats and round().
The following simplified statement reproduces the problem.
select 6.56 - round(convert(float, 6.56), 2)
from sysusers where name = 'public';
===========
-8.88178419
In "real world", the floats are not literals, but float fields in tables.
I could figure, that 6.56 - 6.56 will result in something like 0.00001,
but -8.88178419 is beyond my imagination.
The same statement without round results in 0.
Has anyone any clue on this?
Regards,
Peter
"Peter Scheurer" <sc******@gmx.com> wrote in message
news:2b**************************@posting.google.c om... Hi,
we found some strange behavior when operating with floats and round(). The following simplified statement reproduces the problem.
select 6.56 - round(convert(float, 6.56), 2) from sysusers where name = 'public'; =========== -8.88178419
In "real world", the floats are not literals, but float fields in tables. I could figure, that 6.56 - 6.56 will result in something like 0.00001, but -8.88178419 is beyond my imagination. The same statement without round results in 0.
Has anyone any clue on this? Regards, Peter
The result of the query above is this (on my system):
-8.8817841970012523E-16
Note the E-16 at the end - that's the number before the E multiplied by 10
to the power of minus 16, which is a very small number indeed. Since float
calculations are not precise, a very small difference is not unusual.
Compare the result of this query:
select cast(1.01 as float)-cast(1.0 as float)
1.0000000000000009E-2
This is roughly 1E-2, ie. 0.01.
Simon
I'd like to add that decimal calculations aren't precise either, if you are
calculating with numbers that can't be represented 100% accurately in a
decimal form, eg 1.0/3.0 or 1.0/7.0. Binary calculations are precise on
numbers that are representable accurately in binary in the number of bits
provided in the mantissa of the FLOAT (53 bits) or REAL (24 bits), eg. any
number which can be represented as SUM(POWER(2,x)) where x is a range of
integers such that MAX(x)-MIN(x) <= 52, for FLOAT. Decimals are often not
accurately represented in binary (FLOAT/REAL), because 1/5 is not accurately
representable in binary. The Decimal datatypes change the exponent to a
power of 10, and make the mantissa an integer of 4, 8, 12 or 16 bytes, so
that all decimal numbers of up to 38 digits can be accurately represented.
SELECT 1.-2./3.-1./3.
-----------
.000001
(wow, only 6 decimals by default for a decimal?)
SELECT 1 - 2/3e0 - 1/3e0
-----------------------------------------------------
5.5511151231257827E-17
SELECT 1.0/7.0*7.0
-------------
.9999990
--SELECT 1.0/7.0*7.0
declare @decimals int
declare @sql varchar(80)
set @decimals=0
while @decimals<37
begin
set @sql='print cast(1.'+replicate('0',@decimals)+' as varbinary)'
exec(@sql)
set @decimals = @decimals + 1
end
Some output:
0x0100000101000000 -- 1. is represented as 1 * 10^(1-1)
0x020100010A000000 -- 1.0 is 10 (0x0A) * 10^(2-1)
0x0302000164000000 -- 1.00 is 100 (0x64) * 10^(3-1)... etc
....
0x0B0A000100E40B5402000000
....
0x15140001000010632D5EC76B05000000
....
0x1E1D0001000000A0CA17726DAE0F1E4301000000
....
0x2524000100000000109F4BB31507C97BCE97C000
"Simon Hayes" <sq*@hayes.ch> wrote in message
news:40********@news.bluewin.ch...
[...] Since float
calculations are not precise, a very small difference is not unusual.
Compare the result of this query:
select cast(1.01 as float)-cast(1.0 as float)
1.0000000000000009E-2
This is roughly 1E-2, ie. 0.01.
Simon
Thank you Simon and Aaron,
you were both right:
I tried the statement with query analyzer and I got the correct and
complete result.
It is sqltalk - a tool from Centura Developer, that does the wrong job
when converting floats for viewing in the result window.
Thank you for helping me.
Peter The result of the query above is this (on my system):
-8.8817841970012523E-16
Note the E-16 at the end - that's the number before the E multiplied by 10 to the power of minus 16, which is a very small number indeed. Since float calculations are not precise, a very small difference is not unusual. Compare the result of this query:
select cast(1.01 as float)-cast(1.0 as float)
1.0000000000000009E-2
This is roughly 1E-2, ie. 0.01.
Simon
Thank you Simon and Aaron,
you were both right:
I tried the statement with query analyzer and I got the correct and
complete result.
It is sqltalk - a tool from Centura Developer, that does the wrong job
when converting floats for viewing in the result window.
Thank you for helping me.
Peter The result of the query above is this (on my system):
-8.8817841970012523E-16
Note the E-16 at the end - that's the number before the E multiplied by 10 to the power of minus 16, which is a very small number indeed. Since float calculations are not precise, a very small difference is not unusual. Compare the result of this query:
select cast(1.01 as float)-cast(1.0 as float)
1.0000000000000009E-2
This is roughly 1E-2, ie. 0.01.
Simon This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: j vickroy |
last post by:
Howdy,
I do not understand the following behavior for:
PythonWin 2.3.2 (#49, Oct 2 2003, 20:02:00) on
win32.
>>>
>>> float('0.0')
0.0
>>> row = ('0.0', '1.0', None)
|
by: Vineet Jain |
last post by:
int('2.1') does not work while int(float('2.1')) does. If int can covert a
float object then there is no reason why a float string should not be
converted too.
When I do int('2.1') I get the...
|
by: Marc Schellens |
last post by:
My compiler warns about assignment to int form
float/double.
Will it nevertheless do what I expect?
Are there caveeats/pits?
(Apart from the range and the precision of course)
What would be the...
|
by: Pat |
last post by:
Give two double-typed variable X and Y.
If (X==Y) is true,
then how about the following results:
(float(X) > float(Y))?
(float(X) < float(Y))?
(float(X) >= float(Y))?
( X > float(Y) )?
( X...
|
by: Domel |
last post by:
1 Jak zaokr±glić float'a tak żeby jeżeli czę¶ć dziesiętna była większa lub
równa od 0.5 to był on zaokr±glany w górę, jeżeli mniejsza to w dół
np 1.6 po zaokr 2.0
1.2 po zaokr 1
prosiłbym o ile...
| |
by: Dave win |
last post by:
Hi all:
I'm confused with the expression "(float *())".
Book says that this is a cast. But, I have no idea of this expr.
why could this expr ignore the variable???
Thanx!!!
|
by: Terje Barman |
last post by:
Hi!
I have sumarized float values and I'd like to round the sum to a certain
precision. Say I have 1.234 and want it rounded to 1.23. Which method can I
use?
Terje
|
by: morc |
last post by:
hey,
I have float values that look something like this when they are
printed:
6.0E-4
7.0E-4
I don't want them to be like this I want them to be normalized with 4
decimal places.
|
by: Dilip |
last post by:
Recently in our code, I ran into a situation where were stuffing a
float inside a double. The precision was extended automatically
because of that. To make a long story short, this caused...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
| |
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The...
|
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated ...
| |
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| |