Greetings All, currentley there is a heated discussion in my place of
work over which method is better/more efficient for simple selects.
Background:
1.) Simple Application that uses sql server for backened db.
2.) The application is only inserting and selecting data from the db.
3.) The developers want to use sp_executesql for simple selects and
the dba's want to use a stored proc. From my reading it seems that sp_executesql has a bit of overhead with
it and it is not as efficient as stored procs.
I would appreciate anyone's input on which would be better for simple
repetitive inserts to the db: Stored Proc, or sp_executesql?
Regards, TFD. 3 3467
LineVoltageHalo gen (tr************ ****@yahoo.com) writes: Greetings All, currentley there is a heated discussion in my place of work over which method is better/more efficient for simple selects.
Background: 1.) Simple Application that uses sql server for backened db. 2.) The application is only inserting and selecting data from the db. 3.) The developers want to use sp_executesql for simple selects and the dba's want to use a stored proc.
From my reading it seems that sp_executesql has a bit of overhead with it and it is not as efficient as stored procs.
I would appreciate anyone's input on which would be better for simple repetitive inserts to the db: Stored Proc, or sp_executesql?
From a performance perspective, there is not that extreme difference. If
you use sp_executesql, the plan parameterized query will be cached and
reused, just like the query plan for a stored procedure. But the it does
require that the SQL statement is the same. These three will give different
entries in the cache:
SELECT * FROM tbl WHERE col = @par
select * from tbl where col = @par
SELECT * FROM tbl WHERE col = @par
The cache is both space- and case-sensitive.
There is also a certain overhead for looking up the cached query in the
plan, but normally it is neglible.
But there is also the security aspect of things. Stored procedures permits
you to revoke direct access to the tables, and only provide controlled
access through stored procedures.
--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, es****@sommarsk og.se
Books Online for SQL Server SP3 at http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinf...2000/books.asp
Erland Sommarskog wrote: LineVoltageHalo gen (tr************ ****@yahoo.com) writes: Greetings All, currentley there is a heated discussion in my place
of work over which method is better/more efficient for simple selects.
Background: 1.) Simple Application that uses sql server for backened db. 2.) The application is only inserting and selecting data from the
db. 3.) The developers want to use sp_executesql for simple selects and the dba's want to use a stored proc.
From my reading it seems that sp_executesql has a bit of overhead
with it and it is not as efficient as stored procs.
I would appreciate anyone's input on which would be better for
simple repetitive inserts to the db: Stored Proc, or sp_executesql? From a performance perspective, there is not that extreme difference.
If you use sp_executesql, the plan parameterized query will be cached
and reused, just like the query plan for a stored procedure. But the it
does require that the SQL statement is the same. These three will give
different entries in the cache:
SELECT * FROM tbl WHERE col = @par select * from tbl where col = @par SELECT * FROM tbl WHERE col = @par
The cache is both space- and case-sensitive.
There is also a certain overhead for looking up the cached query in
the plan, but normally it is neglible.
But there is also the security aspect of things. Stored procedures
permits you to revoke direct access to the tables, and only provide
controlled access through stored procedures.
-- Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, es****@sommarsk og.se
Books Online for SQL Server SP3 at http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinf...2000/books.asp
You say it is neglible. However, what if this process runs 50 - 100
thousand times during each load process? EAch of those small neglible
pieces will add up to something measurable?
L
LineVoltageHalo gen (tr************ ****@yahoo.com) writes: You say it is neglible. However, what if this process runs 50 - 100 thousand times during each load process? EAch of those small neglible pieces will add up to something measurable?
If you really want to know, you would have to benchmark. But say that
you have one single statement in the cache of the type:
INSERT dbo.tbl(col1, col2, ...) VALUES (@par1, @par2, ...)
Then the overhead compared to find the stored procedure load_one_row is the
longer time it takes to compute the hash bucket to find it the cache. I
would guess that is miniscule. Note, though, the dbo part. That may be
important.
And, assume that you have a case-insensitive database, and your beloved
programmer has spelt the procedure Load_one_row. Now you will first get a
cache miss, even if you prefix with dbo, because the cache is case
sensitive. After a lookup in the catalog you will eventually hit the cache
anyway.)
Also stored procedures should be prefixed with dbo. when you call them.
(Provided that they are owned by dbo, that is!)
--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, es****@sommarsk og.se
Books Online for SQL Server SP3 at http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinf...2000/books.asp This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: cliverama |
last post by:
help! fried brains....
asp calling a sqlserver7 stored proc which dynamically builds a
sqlstatement & passes it to sp_executesql
asp page gives the operation not allowed when object is closed error
this is the asp code:
Set connInc= server.CreateObject("ADODB.Connection")
connInc.Open "DSN=db_database;User ID=userid;Password=xxxxxx"
Set rsInc= server.CreateObject("ADODB.Recordset")
|
by: Clausmeyer |
last post by:
I want to execute a dynamically generated sql-statement
from inside an user-defined-function. Calling functions and
extended stored-procs is allowed so I tried sp_executesql
as well as sp_prepare/sp_execute ....
but both fail with an error 'only functions and extended stored-procs
may be called from inside a function.'
any idea where I might be wrong ?
|
by: thomson |
last post by:
Hi all,
Can sp_executesql used inside a user defined function, i
tried but it has compiled well, but when i call the functio it shows
Only functions and extended stored procedures can be executed from
within a function.
What i have went wrong
Thanks in advance
|
by: LineVoltageHalogen |
last post by:
Greetings All, currentley there is a heated discussion in my place of
work over which method is better/more efficient for simple selects.
Background:
1.) Simple Application that uses sql server for backened db.
2.) The application is only inserting and selecting data from the db.
3.) The developers want to use sp_executesql for simple selects and
the dba's want to use a stored proc.
>From my reading it seems that sp_executesql has a...
|
by: LineVoltageHalogen |
last post by:
Greetings All, I have a very large query that uses dynamic sql. The
sql is very large and it requires it to be broken into three components
to avoid the nvarchar(4000) issue:
SET @v_SqlString(
N'')
SET @v_SqlString2(
N'')
| |
by: Highlander416 |
last post by:
This is driving me crazy.
I need to create a UDF that would return a TRUE/FALSE (bit) value based
on a comparison it does.
CREATE FUNCTION dbo.SelectedByApplication
(
@ApplicationID int,
@TableToCheck nvarchar(50),
@ColumnToCompare nvarchar(50),
|
by: Dave Sisk |
last post by:
I've created a system or external trigger on an AS/400 file a.k.a DB2 table.
(Note this is an external trigger defined with the ADDPFTRG CL command, not
a SQL trigger defined with the CREATE TRIGGER statement.) I've also defined
a SQL stored proc, and the trigger is set to call this SP. I've posted the
simplified source below. I can manually call the stored proc, and the
external trigger is created without any errors. However, when I do...
|
by: satishchandrat |
last post by:
Hi,
This is regarding the sp_executesql and the sql statement parameter, in processing a dynamic SQL on SQL Server 2000, in my stored procedure.
I have my SQL string exeeding more than 4000 characters.
The sp_executesql expects its parameters to be declared as nvarchar/ntext.
ntext cannot be declared for a local variable and nvarchar has a maximum limit of 4000 characters.
The following was the original approach.
===============
|
by: mirandacascade |
last post by:
Questions toward the bottom of the post.
Situation is this:
1) Access 97
2) SQL Server 2000
3) The Access app:
a) sets up pass-thru query
b) .SQL property of querydef is a string, the contents of which
comprise the call to a stored proc
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look !
Part I. Meaning of...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it.
Here is my compilation command:
g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp
Here is the code in...
| |
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own....
Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
|
by: 6302768590 |
last post by:
Hai team
i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
|
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| |
by: bsmnconsultancy |
last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...
| |