By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
446,364 Members | 1,536 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 446,364 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

working of round()

P: n/a
Does round() always perfectly return the output expected or are there
some artifacts which don't allow perfect functionality

Using python 2.5:
>>round(12.234, 2)
12.23
>>round(12.234, 3)
12.234
>>round(12.234, 1)
12.199999999999999
>>>
but was expecting 12.2

Also, for round(x,n), can't 'x' be an expression

round(5.25/2, 2)

was expecting 2.62 , but
>>round(5.25/2, 2)
2.6299999999999999

Apr 16 '07 #1
Share this Question
Share on Google+
3 Replies


P: n/a
Kr************@gmail.com wrote:
Does round() always perfectly return the output expected or are there
some artifacts which don't allow perfect functionality

Using python 2.5:
>>>round(12.234, 2)
12.23
>>>round(12.234, 3)
12.234
>>>round(12.234, 1)
12.199999999999999

but was expecting 12.2
http://docs.python.org/tut/node16.html
Also, for round(x,n), can't 'x' be an expression

round(5.25/2, 2)

was expecting 2.62 , but
>>>round(5.25/2, 2)
2.6299999999999999
round(x, n) essentially does the following:

math.floor(x * 10**n + 0.5) / 10**n

Since (5.25/2)*100 == 262.5, adding 0.5 gives 263.0 and ultimately 2.63 as the
rounded number. round() does not do anything more complicated like round-to-even.

Use the decimal module if you want decimal arithmetic rather than binary
floating point.

--
Robert Kern

"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco

Apr 16 '07 #2

P: n/a
Kr************@gmail.com wrote:
Does round() always perfectly return the output expected or are there
some artifacts which don't allow perfect functionality

Using python 2.5:
>>>round(12.234, 2)
12.23
>>>round(12.234, 3)
12.234
>>>round(12.234, 1)
12.199999999999999

but was expecting 12.2

Also, for round(x,n), can't 'x' be an expression

round(5.25/2, 2)

was expecting 2.62 , but
>>>round(5.25/2, 2)
2.6299999999999999
You're running into floating-point issues (e.g. it's impossible to
represent 2.63 perfectly in binary). What are you really trying to do?
If you just want to format these with only two decimal places, use
string formatting::
>>'%.2f' % 12.234
'12.23'
>>'%.2f' % (5.25 / 2)
'2.63'

I'm not sure why you would have expected 2.62 for the latter when::
>>5.25 / 2
2.625

STeVe
Apr 16 '07 #3

P: n/a
On Apr 15, 8:06 pm, Krishna.K.1...@gmail.com wrote:
Does round() always perfectly return the output expected or are there
some artifacts which don't allow perfect functionality

Using python 2.5:
>round(12.234, 2)
12.23
>round(12.234, 3)
12.234
>round(12.234, 1)
12.199999999999999

but was expecting 12.2

Also, for round(x,n), can't 'x' be an expression

round(5.25/2, 2)

was expecting 2.62 , but
>round(5.25/2, 2)

2.6299999999999999
The problem is that floats are encoded as fractions where the
denominator is an exponent of 2.
2.63 is not representable as such a fraction.
2.629999999999999999999999999999999999... is the closest fraction.
Rounding this number will only give you the same thing.
If you want decimals to act as expected, use the Decimal class in
module decimal. It works as expected, but is much slower.

Apr 16 '07 #4

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.