Hi, I know this is a terribly simple question, but the docs seem to be
designed for people who probably find a the answer to this question
terribly obvious. But its not at all obvious to me.
I can't figure out why when I define a function, a variable
(specifically a list) that I define and initialize in the argument
definitions, will not initialize itself every time its called. So for
example, when making a simple list of a counting sequence from num (a
range list), if I call the function multiple times, it appends the
elements to the list generated the times it was called before, even
though the variable for the list is initialized in the argument
definitions.
def foo_range(num,a List = []):
aList = []
#why is this seemingly extra initialization necessary? shouldn't it be
initialized in the argument definitions?
#but if its not there and the function is called multiple times the
elements generated (see below)
#append to the list generated before.
while num <= 10:
aList.append(nu m)
num +=1
else:
return aList
Why is this? Thanks, hope its not a stupid quesiton. 7 2071
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Brentt <Br**********@g mail.comwrote:
Hi, I know this is a terribly simple question, but the docs seem to be
designed for people who probably find a the answer to this question
terribly obvious. But its not at all obvious to me.
I can't figure out why when I define a function, a variable
(specifically a list) that I define and initialize in the argument
definitions, will not initialize itself every time its called. So for
example, when making a simple list of a counting sequence from num (a
range list), if I call the function multiple times, it appends the
elements to the list generated the times it was called before, even
though the variable for the list is initialized in the argument
definitions.
def foo_range(num,a List = []):
That should probably be: def foo_range(num, aList=None):
aList = []
#why is this seemingly extra initialization necessary? shouldn't it be
initialized in the argument definitions?
#but if its not there and the function is called multiple times the
elements generated (see below)
#append to the list generated before.
while num <= 10:
aList.append(nu m)
num +=1
else:
return aList
Why is this? Thanks, hope its not a stupid quesiton.
No, but it is a very frequently asked one: http://effbot.org/zone/default-values.htm
Cheers,
Chris
--
Follow the path of the Iguana... http://rebertia.com
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Nov 21, 4:25*pm, Brentt <BrenttNew...@g mail.comwrote:
Hi, I know this is a terribly simple question, but the docs seem to be
designed for people who probably find a the answer to this question
terribly obvious. But its not at all obvious to me.
Don't worry, it's not obvious to *anyone* new to Python (and many not-
so-new for that matter).
I can't figure out why when I define a function, a variable
(specifically a list) that I define and initialize in the argument
definitions, will not initialize itself every time its called. So for
example, when making a simple list of a counting sequence from num (a
range list), if I call the function multiple times, it appends the
elements to the list generated the times it was called before, even
though the variable for the list is initialized in the argument
definitions.
def foo_range(num,a List = []):
aList = []
#why is this seemingly extra initialization necessary? shouldn't it be
initialized in the argument definitions?
#but if its not there and the function is called multiple times the
elements generated (see below)
#append to the list generated before.
while num <= 10:
aList.append(nu m)
num +=1
else:
return aList
Why is this? Thanks, hope its not a stupid quesiton.
Sigh.. no it's not stupid at all; actually it is (and will probably
remain, unfortunately) the most FAQ of all times: http://www.python.org/doc/faq/genera...etween-objects
George
On Nov 22, 8:25*am, Brentt <BrenttNew...@g mail.comwrote:
Hi, I know this is a terribly simple question, but the docs seem to be
designed for people who probably find a the answer to this question
terribly obvious. But its not at all obvious to me.
I can't figure out why when I define a function, a variable
(specifically a list) that I define and initialize in the argument
definitions, will not initialize itself every time its called.
Have you worked through the tutorial (which is part of the docs)? See http://docs.python.org/tutorial/cont...rgument-values
.... look for "Important warning"
Brentt wrote:
Hi, I know this is a terribly simple question, but the docs seem to be
designed for people who probably find a the answer to this question
terribly obvious. But its not at all obvious to me.
I can't figure out why when I define a function, a variable
(specifically a list) that I define and initialize in the argument
definitions, will not initialize itself every time its called. So for
example, when making a simple list of a counting sequence from num (a
range list), if I call the function multiple times, it appends the
elements to the list generated the times it was called before, even
though the variable for the list is initialized in the argument
definitions.
def foo_range(num,a List = []):
aList = []
#why is this seemingly extra initialization necessary? shouldn't it be
initialized in the argument definitions?
#but if its not there and the function is called multiple times the
elements generated (see below)
#append to the list generated before.
while num <= 10:
aList.append(nu m)
num +=1
else:
return aList
Why is this? Thanks, hope its not a stupid quesiton.
The def statement is an executable statement that creates a function
object. When you execute the def statement, the parameter list,
including default arg object expressions, is evaluated for creating the
function object and its associated code object. The 'suite' that
follows the ':' and possible a doc string is compiled for the code object.
The language manual entry for Function definitions explains this, with
the first sentence in bold.
"Default parameter values are evaluated when the function definition is
executed. This means that the expression is evaluated once, when the
function is defined, and that that same “pre-computed” value is used for
each call. This is especially important to understand when a default
parameter is a mutable object, such as a list or a dictionary: if the
function modifies the object (e.g. by appending an item to a list), the
default value is in effect modified."
The allows a choice of having a 'default' evaluated either when the
function is defined, which is nearly always what is wanted, or when the
function is called, by using None or another flag object, and then testing.
tjr
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Brentt schrieb:
| Hi, I know this is a terribly simple question, but the docs seem to be
| designed for people who probably find a the answer to this question
| terribly obvious. But its not at all obvious to me.
|
| I can't figure out why when I define a function, a variable
| (specifically a list) that I define and initialize in the argument
| definitions, will not initialize itself every time its called. So for
| example, when making a simple list of a counting sequence from num (a
| range list), if I call the function multiple times, it appends the
| elements to the list generated the times it was called before, even
| though the variable for the list is initialized in the argument
| definitions.
|
| def foo_range(num,a List = []):
| aList = []
| #why is this seemingly extra initialization necessary? shouldn't it be
| initialized in the argument definitions?
| #but if its not there and the function is called multiple times the
| elements generated (see below)
| #append to the list generated before.
| while num <= 10:
| aList.append(nu m)
| num +=1
| else:
| return aList
|
| Why is this? Thanks, hope its not a stupid quesiton.
look up http://docs.python.org/tutorial/cont...ning-functions
"The execution of a function introduces a new symbol table used for
the local variables of the function. More precisely, all variable
assignments in a function store the value in the local symbol table;
whereas variable references first look in the local symbol table, then
in the local symbol tables of enclosing functions, then in the global
symbol table, and finally in the table of built-in names. Thus, global
variables cannot be directly assigned a value within a function (unless
named in a global statement), although they may be referenced."
Egon
| --
| http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJJz2iZRi Do9Iq4qIRAhTLAJ 41TTysvN++TNF1t vanjAxBPhdBawCf e1tY
uDdbPYWBAEkbYNh bKQGkx88=
=9gL8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:25:45 -0800, Brentt wrote:
I can't figure out why when I define a function, a variable
(specifically a list) that I define and initialize in the argument
definitions, will not initialize itself every time its called.
Because you haven't told the function to initialize the value every time
it's called. You are laboring under a misapprehension . Function default
values are created ONCE, when you define the function.
So for
example, when making a simple list of a counting sequence from num (a
range list), if I call the function multiple times, it appends the
elements to the list generated the times it was called before, even
though the variable for the list is initialized in the argument
definitions.
No it isn't. You need to re-set your thinking, that's not what Python
does. Try this:
def expensive():
# simulate an expensive function call
import time
time.sleep(30)
return time.time()
def parrot(x=expens ive()):
return x
The expensive call is made once only. If you want it made every time, you
have to explicitly make that call every time:
def parrot(x=None):
if x is None:
x = expensive()
return x
For bonus marks, predict the behaviour of this:
def spam():
def ham(x=expensive ()):
return x
return ham()
--
Steven
George Sakkis wrote:
On Nov 21, 4:25 pm, Brentt <BrenttNew...@g mail.comwrote:
>Hi, I know this is a terribly simple question, but the docs seem to be designed for people who probably find a the answer to this question terribly obvious. But its not at all obvious to me.
Don't worry, it's not obvious to *anyone* new to Python (and many not-
so-new for that matter).
Speak for yourself, not for me. This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics |
by: Qin Chen |
last post by:
I will present very long code, hope someone will read it all, and teach me
something like tom_usenet.
This question comes to me when i read <<Think in C++>> 2nd, chapter 10 ,
name control, section "Static initialization dependency". There is a
example to show how to solve the prolem involved with a technique first
poineered by Jerry Schwarz...
|
by: Charles Stapleton |
last post by:
Given the folowing class
class Ctest{
public:
Ctest( int i, int j) :a(i) { b = j; }
private:
int a, b;
}
When creating an object of type Ctest, what advantage is there to setting
|
by: Aniruddha |
last post by:
I want to initialize an array of function pointers (global)
If I do it like:
/* definition of foo_1, foo_2, foo_3 all return void and take no args */
void (* foo) ();
foo = foo_1 ;
foo = foo_2 ;
foo = foo_3 ;
I get a compile time error, but if initialized like :
|
by: wkaras |
last post by:
I've compiled this code:
const int x0 = 10;
const int x1 = 20;
const int x2 = 30;
int x = { x2, x0, x1 };
struct Y
{
|
by: Jess |
last post by:
Hello,
I tried several books to find out the details of object
initialization. Unfortunately, I'm still confused by two specific
concepts, namely default-initialization and value-initialization. I
think default-init calls default constructor for class objects and
sets garbage values to PODs. Value-init also calls default
constructor for...
| |
by: timlyee |
last post by:
int *p = new int;
auto_ptr<intap1 = p; //will fail on 3 1
auto_ptr<intap1(p); //ok 2
*ap1 = 12; // 3
the first situation has called : explicit auto_ptr(_Ty *_Ptr = 0)
_THROW0()
the second : auto_ptr(auto_ptr_ref<_Ty_Right) _THROW0()
|
by: subramanian100in |
last post by:
Suppose we have a class named Test.
Test obj; // assuming default ctor is available
Test direct_init(obj); // direct initialization happens here
Test copy_init = obj; // copy initialization happens here
Suppose we have a function
void fn(Test arg);
|
by: akomiakov |
last post by:
Is there a technical reason why one can't initialize a cost static non-
integral data member in a class?
|
by: krishna |
last post by:
What is the need of this syntax for initializing values, isn't this
ambiguous to function call?
e.g., int func_name(20); this looks like function call (of course not
totally as there is no function body), but is declaration and
initialization of an integer variable 'func_name', is it step towards
completeness of OOP abstraction in the...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can effortlessly switch the default language on Windows 10 without reinstalling. I'll walk you through it.
First, let's disable language...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed.
This is as boiled down as I can make it. ...
| |
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven tapestry of website design and digital marketing. It's not merely about having a website; it's about crafting an immersive digital experience that...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the...
|
by: conductexam |
last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one.
At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert...
|
by: TSSRALBI |
last post by:
Hello
I'm a network technician in training and I need your help.
I am currently learning how to create and manage the different types of VPNs and I have a question about LAN-to-LAN VPNs.
The last exercise I practiced was to create a LAN-to-LAN VPN between two Pfsense firewalls, by using IPSEC protocols.
I succeeded, with both firewalls in...
|
by: adsilva |
last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
| |
by: muto222 |
last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
| |